Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately he will leave prison and while there be able to see and talk to his family unlike the man he murdered.
Chauvin Trial
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Oh I’m sorry. The info you should be taking away from that is he was an asshole cop on a power trip that finally went to far and “murdered” someone. Get it now?
ptrzm
Well-Known Member
Happy to leave, you guys have fully validated my opinion. Enjoy your group think.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
lol sure, don't use your ignore feature, just say it is everyone else fault. On a forum that your account has been open on for a few days must mean that you know enough to say that right?
zeddd
Well-Known Member
Go Back to watching Hannity
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
It’s interesting what you took away from that link. Chauvin’s wife says he’s a gentleman.
You conveniently ignored his history of aggressive and violent behaviour. The fact that a racist system threw out 16 complaints against him doesn’t mean he was innocent, it just means the altercations weren’t videotaped.
who's vaccinating your opinion?
states rights!
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Huh?
did you not hear his statement after sentencing?
ptrzm
Well-Known Member
Eh? I mentioned the complaints. What evidence was provided that any of them were racially motivated, or that they were unjustly thrown out?
Or did your brain just add those parts in?
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
No I didn’t
.
ptrzm
Well-Known Member
Actually, this account has been open for exactly one year, but you'd only have to be here 5 mins to see that the politics section of this board is a disaster.
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
Let me guess. You don’t believe systemic racism exists, right?
Didn’t you say you were leaving?
ptrzm
Well-Known Member
I don't believe systemic racism exists just because you say it does. When people talk about systemic racism without giving any evidence of it, it tells me they are more concerned with pointing fingers and virtue signaling than tackling the root causes which are not surprisingly much more difficult to address.
That's another subject altogether though, and as you said I'm done so if y'all stop responding, I'm done commenting on this story.
Some of these issues are a lawyer's wet dream, to have two completely opposing reasons which both explain the same result, because then the issue is no longer merit-based, it just becomes a medium to display their skill and gain personal notoriety. Certain data points, like crime data, are just that, and people can argue back and forth and they both walk away thinking they're right. Howeverrrr, the best metrics are the racial gerrymandering cases, because if one's perspective is that racial inequality exists, systemically, at least that position has the backing of state supreme court rulings, which usually ranks higher than some rando on the interwebs.
it alluded to suicide plan. something like 'ultimately the Floyd family will be happy with the outcome' (paraphrased).No I didn’t
you're avi is giving me a migraine.