1 month old plants. Should I start the flowering stage, or wait?

[Herb & Suds]

Actual power is 102w

You'll need a better light to flower

 

[Bsmoke78]

That's not enough light to grow even one plant........let alone 4.

Yea upgrade is needed that’s a seedling starter light

 

[Avecchio19]

You'll need a better light to flower

What light do u recommend

 

[Avecchio19]

Yea upgrade is needed that’s a seedling starter light

Wh

Yea upgrade is needed that’s a seedling starter light

what light do you recommend

 

[Bsmoke78]

I use 3-2000 watt Samsung with two 100 watt led for side lighting for 3 ladies they just started flowering

 

[Bsmoke78]

Wh

what light do you recommend

Everyone has there own flavor though

 

[Herb & Suds]

What light do u recommend

Plenty of threads and LED's on this site
If you have the desire you can make a smart choice with a little research

 

[Avecchio19]

Plenty of threads and LED's on this site
If you have the desire you can make a smart choice with a little research

Ok thank you

 

[VincenzioVonHook]

That's not enough light to grow even one plant........let alone 4.

Load of crap. My housemate pulled 150g off one auto under a mars hydro TS 600 in soil. That's a 100w light. Just search YouTube and check out people pulling QP's from 2x2 tents with 100w leds before you clearly push misinformation. Plants don't grow from wattage, plants grow from the available amount of photon particles within a certain wavelength.

This is under one TS 600. Sure you could do better, but to say you can't flower under it is just plain wrong.

 

[Old_fart_stoner]

More light, and more time fer' sure. Personally I would start doing some LST at that stage.

 

[MickFoster]

Load of crap. My housemate pulled 150g off one auto under a mars hydro TS 600. That's a 100w light. Just search YouTube and check out people pulling QP's from 2x2 tents with 100w leds before you clearly push misinformation. Plants don't grow from wattage, plants grow from the available amount of photon particles.

This is under one TS 600

You might want to brush up on your math genius........you and I are saying almost the same thing.
The example you gave was a 100w in a 2x2 tent........that's 25w per sq.ft.
The OP has over double that size........9 sq.ft.
I recommended he double the light he had, which would amount to 206w.
Stick with me here.
206w in a 3x3 tent is 23w per sq.ft.
I was recommending less light than you used for your example.
That's hardly a load of crap, or misinformation.

 

[VincenzioVonHook]

You might want to brush up on your math genius........you and I are saying almost the same thing.
The example you gave was a 100w in a 2x2 tent........that's 25w per sq.ft.
The OP has over double that size........9 sq.ft.
I recommended he double the light he had, which would amount to 206w.
Stick with me here.
206w in a 3x3 tent is 23w per sq.ft.
I was recommending less light than you used for your example.
That's hardly a load of crap, or misinformation.

Yep, for his setup it's not enough. I agree. What I have an issue with is saying that you can't grow a single plant with a 100w light.

That is plain wrong. People will browse this thread, and get the idea from you guys that you simply can't grow a single plant with a 100w light.

Personally I'd go with a Mars TSL 2000, or three TS600s in a 4x2, and stick with 3 plants.

I just have issue with people making claims like "100w is not enough for one plant". If you look closely i quoted your statement, not your advice that he needs more light in his setup. It was specifically a dig at the claim that 100w is not enough for a single plant, regardless of where it's grown.