Do you agree or disagree with Twitters decision to suspend Trump for tweeting

[Kdoggy]

they know because the votes get counted by more then one person, 3 at a time count and double check. I could understand a lone person trying to fudge a few numbers here. but you would have to multiply that by million, your saying all those people kept silent? come on man, it simply isn't true.

I thought it was a dominion voting system for alot of votes?

 

[Boru420]

 

[kovidkough]

I thought it was a dominion voting system for alot of votes?

when they count the votes they do it on camera and 3 people count each vote. that deters fraud.

not taking about the electoral college simply citizen votes

 

[Mr_X]

hate speech

noun

1. abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.

so. yes

do you think its ok for individuals being able to freely post pictures promoting kids to sell drugs at schools and commit acts of violence?

 

[Kdoggy]

"twitter shouldn't be government regulated so we can have free speech and say whatever we want even if it promotes murder, rape, drugs, school shootings, violent racist acts. all that shouldn't be regulated" - redhats

So the post he got banned for said that? Maybe i read a diff twitter message that he posted do you have the one he did any of that in from yesterday i need to see what he actually got banned for i guess. Terrible if he did that stuff.

 

[kovidkough]

do you think its ok for individuals being able to freely post pictures promoting kids to sell drugs at schools and commit acts of violence?

no

kids need to stay in school to avoid ending up in politics threads

 

[Kdoggy]

when they count the votes they do it on camera and 3 people count each vote. that deters fraud.

not taking about the electoral college simply citizen votes

Isnt dominion computerized?

 

[Mr_X]

So the post he got banned for said that? Maybe i read a diff twitter message that he posted do you have the one he did any of that in from yesterday i need to see what he actually got banned for i guess. Terrible if he did that stuff.

yeah. thats one of them.

 

[Mr_X]

no

why not? its not hate speech? free speech right?

 

[kovidkough]

why not? its not hate speech? free speech right?

because you shouldn't be telling kids to sell drugs, nor act violent.
I suppose if promote those things it makes a shitty person

 

[420blazedru]

I agree with Twitter and Facebook....fuck trump.

 

[Kdoggy]

yeah. thats one of them.

Ok ya i was like no kidding ban him. If he disagreed with something that mainstream media is pushing then dont ban for that. Let free speech be just that. If no violence is incited or hate then why cant he say it? He doesnt agree with the votes so you ban him cause some “supporters” go wild i dont think this is going to help it will probably make it worse. Your silencing their leader what happens next i guess we see i dont think hes just gonna vanish.

 

[Mr_X]

because you shouldn't be telling kids to sell drugs, nor act violent.
I suppose if promote those things it makes a shitty person

so should the government tell twitter to make some restrictions to protect the public terms of service or free speech to say whatever you want?

 

[kovidkough]

so should the government tell twitter to make some restrictions to protect the public terms of service or free speech to say whatever you want?

idc what Twitter does

again "terms of service"

you don't like it. don't use it

 

[Mr_X]

government regulations, such as consumer protective acts, is designed to protect the people, but redhats think its ok to do and say whatever they want even if it is destructive in manner and that government is the problem.

 

[hanimmal]

My only question is when did twitter become the judge and really shows how media can control the masses for one side or the other.

When they put up the time, money, and effort it took to build their own platform. That was when Twitter earned the right to say who and how their platform can be used.

I guess its kinda like china does smother the free speech whether you agree or disagree. Im sure activists are lying there too would be their argument.

No. China is a government. Twitter is a business.

Ya they deff have the right to ban him as long as they do it to both sides just not a one sided thing.

1. Says who

If another president going forward puts anything unsubstantiated then ban it.

"unsubstantiated" is not the same as actively calling for and getting a riot to occur. Trump's actively lying to you. Over and over in very provable and obvious ways. It is not about just flubbing up some lines when he goes off script. He is actively conning his followers.

So sure, if any public office holder is doing that I would strongly hope that Twitter would ban then too.

But they are still deciding what to believe and what the world should believe by saying the election wasnt rigged how does anyone really know?

Because it has been investigated. Fraud was found, but nothing on the level of changing the election for Trump. Did you actually listen to any of the people who have actively worked to get people the actual facts of this and not Trump's con men and women?

Saying you want to have both sides of the conversation is a great line, but it doesn't mean that people should have to chase their tails over and over again when things are proven and debunked just because trolls like Trump get to spend your hard earned money to try to keep power.

But in the interest of no civil war just remove the donald and move on to starting a war outside of usa. Its been 4 years of in fighting time to move the battle to the middle east (sarcasm). Politicians are all corrupt and idiots.

Do you understand that our nation has been under attack for 4 years by a hostile foreign military? Trump has left us citizens extremely vulnerable and is doing everything he can to hold onto power using this attack as cover.

I assume you are an American, but I haven't asked this, sorry if it sounds condescending, I don't mean it to.

Are you an American. And if so are you ok with the Russian military attacking our citizens?

Yup social media will be the downfall of humanity.

We'll see.

 

[Hollatchaboy]

But they are still deciding what to believe and what the world should believe by saying the election wasnt rigged how does anyone really know? But in the interest of no civil war just remove the donald and move on to starting a war outside of usa. Its been 4 years of in fighting time to move the battle to the middle east (sarcasm). Politicians are all corrupt and idiots.

There's election fraud in every election. It's no secret. That said, there wasn't enough evidence of election fraud to change the outcome. That's how we know. Even pansy ass Lindsey Graham said, with all the supposed "illegal votes", to show him just ten, and he couldn't get not one. When even the gop says move on, you know there's no evidence.

 

[Star Dog]

If he's breaking the terms he can't expect anything else, but I'm all for free speach even a idiot has a view and is entitled to share it.
I don't particularly like him but I think it's unfair to suspend all his tweets if they meet the terms and conditions.

Personally I'm delighted they've shut him the fuck up!
I've little interest in politics even UK related, I watched a TV show about him in part a couple of nights back, OMFG I didn't realise just how fucking pathetic he is, the Obama birth certificate scenario speaks volumes about his racism (FYI this is news to me) that's how much interest I have in politics.

I thought this funny as

 

[Mr_X]

There's election fraud in every election. It's no secret. That said, there wasn't enough evidence of election fraud to change the outcome. That's how we know. Even pansy ass Lindsey Graham said, with all the supposed "illegal votes", to show him just ten, and he couldn't get not one. When even the gop says move on, you know there's no evidence.

some people dont understand that you can't convict someone of a crime by allegations, accusations, and suspicious evidence which can be dismissed. you need intent, liable witnesses, clear and convincing documentation, and clear and convincing without a reasonable doubt evidence. but thats too hard to understand.

 

[Kdoggy]

When they put up the time, money, and effort it took to build their own platform. That was when Twitter earned the right to say who and how their platform can be used.



No. China is a government. Twitter is a business.



1. Says who



"unsubstantiated" is not the same as actively calling for and getting a riot to occur. Trump's actively lying to you. Over and over in very provable and obvious ways. It is not about just flubbing up some lines when he goes off script. He is actively conning his followers.

So sure, if any public office holder is doing that I would strongly hope that Twitter would ban then too.



Because it has been investigated. Fraud was found, but nothing on the level of changing the election for Trump. Did you actually listen to any of the people who have actively worked to get people the actual facts of this and not Trump's con men and women?

Saying you want to have both sides of the conversation is a great line, but it doesn't mean that people should have to chase their tails over and over again when things are proven and debunked just because trolls like Trump get to spend your hard earned money to try to keep power.



Do you understand that our nation has been under attack for 4 years by a hostile foreign military? Trump has left us citizens extremely vulnerable and is doing everything he can to hold onto power using this attack as cover.

I assume you are an American, but I haven't asked this, sorry if it sounds condescending, I don't mean it to.

Are you an American. And if so are you ok with the Russian military attacking our citizens?



We'll see.

Yes you like to argue i know