First off...if the OP is asking about flouro, was does someone inevitably have to champion in the use of HPS? Why not just answer the OP's question? Maybe he/she is growing in a small space and heat would be an issue and he/she would NOT be better off with an HPS...
Maybe the OP is unfamiliar with HPS and extra information would be helpful to make a more informed decision. Why champion around HPS ? Probably because it gives the best results at this time. Even with a small space, you can use a smaller HPS fixture along with proper ventilation and get better results than flourescents. Looks like spelling big words instead of getting maximum results is more important to you.
Did you notice I actually provided an answer to the OP...along with the reasoning? That is helpful information. It doesn't take more than a few minutes for the un-initiated to see that the majority of larger grows use HPS. Obviously CFL would not be a good choice in that case.
Did you notice I actually provided an answer to the OP...along with the reasoning? That is helpful information. It doesn't take more than a few minutes for the un-initiated to see that the majority of larger grows use HPS. Obviously CFL would not be a good choice in that case.
I will point out to you that when you start to get down to the lower wattage, HPS efficiency starts to decline. Grams per watt is not much different at 150 watts and below regardless of HPS or CFL. People complain about bud density, but the weight is about the same. It is about .60 - .65 grams per watt.
Big words more important?...No, if a person can understand the technical aspects...GREAT! If not, then no big deal. There are lots of different types of people who read these forums. I post info for everyone. Has nothing to to do with 'BIG' words.
Yo MegaD, go ahead and use both anytime you want... veg and/or flower. Spectrum is nice but intensity is just as important.
yeah that's ideal, unless your tight for height then you want more 6400K than 2700K that will cut down the stretching.