ProteinPapi420
Well-Known Member
Hi! I have never heard before about this type of light for growing herb. They say its really great and it doesnt use much electrity too but its weird is that I dont really see people using it.
Do you know anything about the cost between hps and chm? ( I mean electricity)I havnt used them myself but am looking into them. Apparantly they are more efficient than other HIDs. Less yield than HPS, but more crystal development because of higher UV light. I am thinking of using them in my veg room instead of standard MH. I was considering doing half HPS half CMH in flower room but am finding it hard to come across the 1000w CMHs.
600w is 600wDo you know anything about the cost between hps and chm? ( I mean electricity)
Then why do most growers say they prefer cmh?HPS beats both MH & CMH and is a more suitable flower builder light, it brings IR, FR, FR EOD peak, red & yellow efficient PAR output...
MH lots of UV, blue & green, the CMH lasts longer and has a much less spikey output, but less UV as MH (+ much higher hardware costs)
High colored MH + HPS double combo is best spectrum-wise at low cost
Bit of hype and personal prefference, i dont think most growers say that. I recently added a cmh into my room of hps and i like the moxed spectrum reckon its great but if i had to choose one or the other i would choose hpsThen why do most growers say they prefer cmh?
How about that the PAR of chm is higher?Bit of hype and personal prefference, i dont think most growers say that. I recently added a cmh into my room of hps and i like the moxed spectrum reckon its great but if i had to choose one or the other i would choose hps
Maybe dunno havnt ever tested par myselfHow about that the PAR of chm is higher?
Most CMH growers will say they prefer CMHThen why do most growers say they prefer cmh?
indeed spectrum-wise they're one of the best - everything is in there...Just the nice white light is a huge plus..
out of them all i prefer cmh. i run led 100% now but i would love to do cmh again. but as u said all to their own.Most CMH growers will say they prefer CMH
Most LED growers will say they prefer LED
Most HPS growers will say they prefer HPS.
Lot of misinformation still circulating about cmh, since they became popular it was stated a 315 would replace a 600w hps which is nonsense.
Go look for the 315 cmh club thread in indoor growing, then look at the 600 club. See what people are doing with both types of light.
Not sure its fair to compare a 315 to something close to double its watts.. even in LED vs HIDMost CMH growers will say they prefer CMH
Most LED growers will say they prefer LED
Most HPS growers will say they prefer HPS.
Lot of misinformation still circulating about cmh, since they became popular it was stated a 315 would replace a 600w hps which is nonsense.
Go look for the 315 cmh club thread in indoor growing, then look at the 600 club. See what people are doing with both types of light.
I like LED for flowering but only flowered two runs with the cmh. But I love cmh for veg way more than LED.out of them all i prefer cmh. i run led 100% now but i would love to do cmh again. but as u said all to their own.
i like led for flowering now but if u give me the option to flower with cmh u bet i will idk why i just like how bud comes out under it. and for veg yes your right its great for veg.I like LED for flowering but only flowered two runs with the cmh. But I love cmh for veg way more than LED.
Your right its not, just what happened , least in euro hydro shops. They were all touting them as equal to 600 hps at one point.Not sure its fair to compare a 315 to something double its watts.. even in LED.