UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
44 million unemployed is winningI'm your huckleberry
You seem very disturbed, maybe you should talk to someone about that lol.
Good to see someone else is triggered LMFAO. So much winning
Russian bounties to kill Americans in Afghanistan
- Thread starter injinji
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Mr.Estrain
Well-Known Member
You people think I like Trump?
LMFAO
Gawd , I didn't think this could get any funnier.
The only thing I like about Trump is that he is the optime of America. He's the perfect representation. A bully with no class, low brow, below average intelligence with questionable morals and ethics. All of the world to see for themselves. That is the man the Americans wanted to run their country. A failed businessman and reality tv host.
The only thing I like about Trump is the way he makes America look, dumb.
LMFAO
Gawd , I didn't think this could get any funnier.
The only thing I like about Trump is that he is the optime of America. He's the perfect representation. A bully with no class, low brow, below average intelligence with questionable morals and ethics. All of the world to see for themselves. That is the man the Americans wanted to run their country. A failed businessman and reality tv host.
The only thing I like about Trump is the way he makes America look, dumb.
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
It isn't often one is treated to such an honest display of infantilism
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Yes, the way the message was played in the Lincoln Project, it was propaganda in that it wasn't trying to provide both sides of the story. What IS the other side of the story? Trump's excuse is "he didn't know". "He didn't know" that Putin had put a bounty on US soldiers at the very time Trump was conducting peace talks with the Taliban.
Laugh out loud at your "both sides are bad" argument. A total fail. The issue is, Putin put a bounty on US soldiers during a time when there is no war between the countries. Yet isn't paying assassins to kill our soldiers an act of war? That, all by itself is cause for sanctions against them. NATO would be likely to join in those sanctions.
Laugh at you for your weak arguments. You aren't any good at this.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Estrain is one of two things. A troll that is payed to play a role and work off a script. Or a sadomasochist or something along those lines. Either way he's shit on your shoe that you can't quite scrape off.
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
there is no shit that I can't scrape off my shoe
I'm a master jeweler and have a good stock of dental instruments which lend themselves to such ends
radiant Rudy
Well-Known Member
Goat felching bumpkin, did you use an RU translation service for that word shit? Your intellectual handicaps and shit choked, disjointed, and amusing struggle to not present as a common fucking idiot come through brilliantly.
Syntax, spelling, grammar are on par with the "#triggered, rofl, queer, lmfao" eloquence of your prior dumps. "Low brow" laments the lout, lol.
Last edited:
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
No he got elected because Russia and other foreign dictators tricked about 18% of our country into thinking Trump is a good idea with their years of attacking our citizens along with a few hundred thousand or so that thought Clinton wouldn't be a far better president in key states.
Trump of course helped by giving Putin our voting data so that the Russians knew exactly who to attack online down to the districts they live in.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Trump's Response to Putin's Bounty on US Troops - "There Have Not Been Many Attacks on Us"
After the New York Times reported that Russian President Putin put bounties on the heads of US soldiers, Trump's response is to deny any knowledge, disclaim any responsibility and say there really weren't "many attacks" on our men and women in uniform. That is little consolation to the soldiers who were injured and the families who lost loved ones.
After the New York Times reported that Russian President Putin put bounties on the heads of US soldiers, Trump's response is to deny any knowledge, disclaim any responsibility and say there really weren't "many attacks" on our men and women in uniform. That is little consolation to the soldiers who were injured and the families who lost loved ones.
dandyrandy
Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Joe: GOP Senators, Speak Out For Our Troops Today | Morning Joe | MSNBC
Joe Scarborough weighs in on new reporting that American troops in Afghanistan have been the target of some Taliban operations backed by Russia. Joe calls on Republican senators to speak out on the issue. Aired on 6/29/2020.
Joe Scarborough weighs in on new reporting that American troops in Afghanistan have been the target of some Taliban operations backed by Russia. Joe calls on Republican senators to speak out on the issue. Aired on 6/29/2020.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Let's talk about Trump's warrants and an inside joke....
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Trump Denies Being Briefed On Russian Bounty Plot | Morning Joe | MSNBC
NYT reporter Charlie Savage discusses new reporting on a Russian plot offering Taliban bounty to kill Americans and what the Trump administration knew about the plot. Aired on 6/29/2020.
NYT reporter Charlie Savage discusses new reporting on a Russian plot offering Taliban bounty to kill Americans and what the Trump administration knew about the plot. Aired on 6/29/2020.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Oh, Oh, here's trouble for Trump, looks like the elephant's back might have broke from carrying all of Donald's accumulating water. Expect a tweet tornado...
------------------------------------------------------
What was clear Monday is that members of Congress want to resolve these questions fast. Thornberry, of the House Armed Services Committee, said that the safety of American and allied troops could depend on it.
"When when you're dealing with the lives of our servicemembers, especially in Afghanistan — especially these allegations that there were bounties put on Americans deaths, then it is incredibly serious," he said. "We in Congress need to see the information and the sources to judge that ourselves and, and it needs to happen early this week. You know, it will not be acceptable to delay."
Let's see, today is Monday, early this week... Looks like someone wants answers and won't fuck around to get them over this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.npr.org
Congress Unites To Demand Answers From Trump On Russian Bounties In Afghanistan
Members of Congress in both parties demanded answers on Monday about reported bounties paid by Russian operatives to Afghan insurgents for targeting American troops.
The stories appeared to have taken even the most senior lawmakers off guard and they said they wanted briefings soon from the Defense Department and the intelligence community.
"I think it is absolutely essential that we get the information and be able to judge its credibility," said Texas Rep. Mac Thornberry, the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee.
The story is unfolding along two parallel tracks in Washington, based on two key questions:
First, what actually has taken place — and have any American troops been killed as the result of Russian-sponsored targeted action? And second: who knew what about the reporting on these allegations that has flowed up from the operational level in Afghanistan?
The White House tried to defend itself over the weekend on both counts, arguing that senior intelligence officials aren't convinced about the reliability of the reports and that they never reached President Trump or Vice President Mike Pence personally.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who normally receives some of the most sensitive intelligence briefings as a member of the so-called Gang of Eight leaders in the Congress, said she too hadn't been informed and sent a letter on Monday requesting a briefing for all the members of the House soon.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called for a briefing for all the members of the Senate.
Pelosi cited reports in The New York Times and The Washington Post that suggested that Trump has been aware of the bounty practice since earlier this year but he and his deputies haven't acted in response.
"The administration's disturbing silence and inaction endanger the lives of our troops and our coalition partners," she wrote.Another top House lawmaker demanding more information was Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, Republicans' number-three leader in the chamber.
Past accounts have suggested that Trump doesn't read many of his President's Daily Briefs and prefers to hear from in-person intelligence presenters — but even then, according to the recent book by former national security adviser John Bolton, Trump does more talking than listening.
This has added to questions about practices within the administration for passing intelligence to the president that he might not like or wish to hear about.
For example, former officials have said they learned not to talk with Trump about Russian interference in U.S. elections, about which Trump has been critical and skeptical.
Another example included reports that suggested Trump had received warnings about the coronavirus in his daily briefing but hadn't absorbed them; the White House has detailed two specific briefings Trump received about the virus early this year.
more...
------------------------------------------------------
What was clear Monday is that members of Congress want to resolve these questions fast. Thornberry, of the House Armed Services Committee, said that the safety of American and allied troops could depend on it.
"When when you're dealing with the lives of our servicemembers, especially in Afghanistan — especially these allegations that there were bounties put on Americans deaths, then it is incredibly serious," he said. "We in Congress need to see the information and the sources to judge that ourselves and, and it needs to happen early this week. You know, it will not be acceptable to delay."
Let's see, today is Monday, early this week... Looks like someone wants answers and won't fuck around to get them over this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congress Unites To Demand Answers From Trump On Russian Bounties In Afghanistan
Lawmakers in both parties demand to learn more from the Trump administration after press reports suggested that Russian operatives have paid Afghan insurgents to target U.S. forces.
www.npr.org
Congress Unites To Demand Answers From Trump On Russian Bounties In Afghanistan
Members of Congress in both parties demanded answers on Monday about reported bounties paid by Russian operatives to Afghan insurgents for targeting American troops.
The stories appeared to have taken even the most senior lawmakers off guard and they said they wanted briefings soon from the Defense Department and the intelligence community.
"I think it is absolutely essential that we get the information and be able to judge its credibility," said Texas Rep. Mac Thornberry, the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee.
The story is unfolding along two parallel tracks in Washington, based on two key questions:
First, what actually has taken place — and have any American troops been killed as the result of Russian-sponsored targeted action? And second: who knew what about the reporting on these allegations that has flowed up from the operational level in Afghanistan?
The White House tried to defend itself over the weekend on both counts, arguing that senior intelligence officials aren't convinced about the reliability of the reports and that they never reached President Trump or Vice President Mike Pence personally.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who normally receives some of the most sensitive intelligence briefings as a member of the so-called Gang of Eight leaders in the Congress, said she too hadn't been informed and sent a letter on Monday requesting a briefing for all the members of the House soon.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called for a briefing for all the members of the Senate.
Pelosi cited reports in The New York Times and The Washington Post that suggested that Trump has been aware of the bounty practice since earlier this year but he and his deputies haven't acted in response.
"The administration's disturbing silence and inaction endanger the lives of our troops and our coalition partners," she wrote.Another top House lawmaker demanding more information was Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, Republicans' number-three leader in the chamber.
Liz Cheney
@Liz_Cheney
If reporting about Russian bounties on US forces is true, the White House must explain:
1. Why weren’t the president or vice president briefed? Was the info in the PDB?
2. Who did know and when?
3. What has been done in response to protect our forces & hold Putin accountable?
Although Trump and Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe both said the president hasn't been briefed about the alleged bounty practice, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not address whether aspects of the reporting had been included in written briefings submitted to the president.
Past accounts have suggested that Trump doesn't read many of his President's Daily Briefs and prefers to hear from in-person intelligence presenters — but even then, according to the recent book by former national security adviser John Bolton, Trump does more talking than listening.
This has added to questions about practices within the administration for passing intelligence to the president that he might not like or wish to hear about.
For example, former officials have said they learned not to talk with Trump about Russian interference in U.S. elections, about which Trump has been critical and skeptical.
Another example included reports that suggested Trump had received warnings about the coronavirus in his daily briefing but hadn't absorbed them; the White House has detailed two specific briefings Trump received about the virus early this year.
more...
Last edited:
blueberryrose
Well-Known Member
Heavens no. He'll be put in charge of a lucrative Ukrainian gas firm that pays him $80,000/month - because daddy is the latest and greatest senile commander in chief!
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I know that the Republicans tried really hard to get that to stick after Trump got himself impeached trying to strong-arm a vulnerable ally into manufacturing dirt on Biden (because Trump is afraid how he is cheating won't work on Biden), but if you want to get worked up about nepotism in DC, I would consider that if those numbers are correct, It would take Trump Jr about an hour to make about the same as much using daddy's office.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-his-girlfriend-were-paid-50000-out-student-fees-speech-university-florida-1462508
Biden's kid has a law degree, and a famous name, and took a job with a company, I would double check what he made there, but regardless, it is not illegal for a 50 year old man to take a job. I can agree it is a good thing that we are not electing him into any office however, because unlike Trump, Biden will not be appointing his kids to middle east peace and global pandemics.
i can totally see this as being propaganda of some kind (maybe floated by those in Lincoln Project who knows?), it's just that Trumpy* is such a fvcking liar and despot..it automatically becomes true whether it is or not..people can say anything about him now.
Russia will always deny..making it worse.
Russia will always deny..making it worse.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Cuckold
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
I'm sure somebody has brought this up, but can you even imagine what the right wing media machine would say if this were Obama or Hillary instead of Trump?
This would be Benghazi x 5.
This would be Benghazi x 5.