Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You are skilled at propaganda.
Next thing they'll ban.
- Thread starter PadawanWarrior
- Start date
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
What? That was George Wallace's campaign theme! How dare they?Already lost the Duke boys. Next they're gonna try to ban classic rock.
It didn't happen if you erase it from history.
Then we will wipe the slate clean of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.
I'm not saying there's not social and racial inequality, but how can you learn from past mistakes if you erase everything. That's the whole point of History. Learn from past mistakes and get better.
And don't be so quick to call Skynyrd racist. Boo! Boo! Boo! We all did what we could do.
15 things we have to explain about the song 'Sweet Home Alabama'
"Sweet Home Alabama" released in June 1974 by Lynyrd Skynyrd, is arguably one of the most popular Southern rock songs of all time, and most assuredly in Alabamawww.al.com
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Not really...
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
George Wallace hated that song.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Her propaganda is crude but as one can see from her reception by her fellow right wing trolls, she speaks propaganda fluently.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You know your propaganda well. Too funny how your kind always dwell on ancient history. I laugh because one has to look back a hundred years to find examples of Democrats behaving like today's Republicans.
But then, a picture is worth a thousand words. Below , a picture of then young Democrats, who are now old Republicans, harassing peaceful people engaged in a lawful sit-in at a segregated Walgreens lunch counter in 1963.
Attachments
Last edited:
PadawanWarrior
Well-Known Member
Well I called it. Now they're talking about getting rid of Washington and Jefferson, lol.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
well no sweat for you because they didnt rape and enslave your ancestors.
Werp
Well-Known Member
Educate yourself
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
lol, u r an incel
Werp
Well-Known Member
Uncle Buck...you seem a little, well...unstable lets say. Maybe you should leave you smoke filled basement for a while and get some fresh air.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Where is that thread...
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Damn man, first off, warn someone when the first 2 minutes is just random rambling boring bullshit please. I know if you are just the next in the infinite line of sock puppet trolls be it Russian/Saudi/ChineseCultist/Foreign/Racist/Evangelical/Domestic that you think are paying you to make stupid posts and spread whatever it is to get Dear Leader elected, that wasting peoples time is part of the game, but be a human.
Christ 3 minutes in and still nothing but bullshitting.
3:50.... talking about black women being 2 'categories' that intersect.... That is the first thing I think he is even almost on topic about.
4:00 'what if you're gay unattractive black woman'...... Has there ever been a law against ugly people voting?
Then back to pontification of pretending whatever bullshit he is deciding to categorize people who discuss 'white privelage' a little trolling of a early 'paper' on it... and we are about 5:30 in. Hope he actually starts to explain shit finally.
6:07, back to rambling about the woman who wrote this paper talking about white privilege.
@6:50 he starts snow flaking about the early study requirements....
Ok finally says something @7:20 to try to refute being able to purchase in any neighborhood that the author said was 'white privilege' and he disagreed and called that a problem of 'wealth' instead. The problem is he is pretending minority communities have not been redlined and kept out of financial markets necessary to be able to purchase homes in certain neighborhoods until very recently, and after missing all of the low cost entry opportunities. But who knows maybe he will cover that in the last 2:40 minutes.
7:50 he asked the question about all of her questions being 'white' privilege or 'majority' privilege. In America, white men engaged in genocide of the people of the land that were native, so their relatively small population was firmly in charge. So it is 'white' privilege, who used that privilege of advanced weapons to become the 'majority'.
Damn, then he just whines like a little baby until 9:01 as he walks away saying 'white privilege' like it is a joke.
By 9:22 he defines racism as "to attribute to a individual the attributes of the community as if the groups are homogenous".
And that is it, he disregards everything based on his definition and whines for the remaining 50 seconds.
What a waste of time.
White Male privilege is alive and well, even if it is no longer absolute since the civil rights era. And the Wealthy White Heterosexual Male Only agenda uses the fear of losing it to trick people into voting for the Republicans ever since.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
peterson thinks that women who wear makeup deserve to be sexually harassed
so whenever I see someone spam us with that tard I know they have never touched a woman in their entire life
So we're they ignorant or did they not give a damn?
Werp
Well-Known Member
The reason woman wear make up is to make themselves more sexually attractive to the opposite sex (most cases) So if you're worried about the opposite sex finding you attractive maybe you shouldn't wear makeup. Jordon does not condone people harassing other's sexually.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he said women who wear makeup to work deserve to be sexually harassed.
you are an incel.
LOL
PadawanWarrior
Well-Known Member
It wasn't thought of as a hate flag. I grew up watching the Dukes and I never associated the flag with racism. I just thought of it as a sign of rebellion. The Dukes were rebels, fighting the system, and Skynyrd meant it the same way. I think it was the skinheads and other racists who turned it into a hate symbol. I know it's a delicate subject though.
Werp
Well-Known Member
You are the CNN of RUI...Uncle Buck=fake news- twisting words people say to fit your narrative.