Raise those lights up to at least 24" if not higher.well thats what all the info is saying between 10 24 inches
ill give it a go but yea i thought it need 3 per table for co2 enrichmentRaise those lights up to at least 24" if not higher.
36" might be even better since you have multiple lights. I would raise the shit outta them and see how the plants respond. 18" is way too close.so at what height do you think they need to be over the canopy
table is 4x8 the canopy could be 5x9 or more..so if that's over one 4x8 that's absurd
a par meter was going to be purchased but i was advised its not really needed. the same tables had 2000watt hps "these were in sunsystem xxxl hoods at about 2.5 ft from the canopy" over then and it was quite impressive. I will raise the temperature to 85 and the lights to 24 inches and see how plants grow under them,that's still 45 watts a square foot if your running full power
I agree they junk. I have 2. You will yield more with those gpw wise, but watch your quality compared to hps. You going to shit. If you keep going and are married i bet you get close to divorce if she cares about bud. Mine freakedHere
Not the case for most people.from being used to getting 35grams a plant from a 12 inch tall pant thats buds are so dense you could throw them throw a window, i can ttell they are alot slower at growing, you should throw up a 1000whps and see the difference. so basically its
spend 12k lights to go from 20lbs to 10lbs. and use half as much power...... its not worth it hps = weight and vigor.
led = shitty and expensive
I know man, it's just user error. He doesn't seem to get that though.Not the case for most people.
LOL user error mate. Your doing something wrong or haven't adjusted your shit, or your trying to veg with too much power and not high enough temps.maybe you should try a 1000whps. for you people that are getting the same result from the LEDS u must just not be that good at growing