lol
..if you use the term "homosexual" in a blatant attempt to demean another person via mockery or otherwise, it's homophobic.
You're the one saying it's an insult. I'm the one saying there's nothing wrong with being gay.
The way it was used, in an effort to demean another person, is indeed an insult. I added additional context to your statement. I also agree that there's nothing wrong with being gay. I attended my first gay pride parade in the late 70's, thank you.
You removed context from someone else's statement, stopped responding to him after he rebutted you and added context to my concise statement...
I don't follow all posts here, but I never saw that other guy whoever say that to UncleBuck, I only saw UncleBuck say it. There is no need for Buck to repeat back what Buck is now claiming was originally an insult directed to him.
Yet you are unwilling to respond to him. I'm not here defending him. You are the one who is repeatedly claiming something and I responded to that. You are the one who keeps addressing me with bullshit, unilaterally. You addressed me and I replied back. Your claim that you don't follow all posts is also bullshit, you have been following me from thread to thread like a fucking lost puppy, desperate for a whiff of my ass. What's next, you're going to cry because I respond to you when you keep addressing me?
Follow you? You wish. You are a hyper-poster, how can I miss your posts? Heck you tagged me in three separate threads, asking me to participate in a 4th thread, but I'm the one following you? Gimme a break dude.
I didn't tag you in shit. I replied to you in each case after you addressed me except for the one time, but that was me responding to your comment on a thread I started. Go back and check, dumb ass. I even started rerouting your replies to me to that thread because you fucking cried about it after you were the one addressing me.
I don't think "immigration policy should have racial bias", now you're just making stuff up. I believe in open immigration.
So you deny saying this?
I'm not going to deny saying that, but the point of the statement isn't intended to suggest that immigration policy should have a racial bias. That was part of a larger convo, and the point is simply to be aware of which racial groups are being discriminated against when it comes to immigration policy. The first step towards fighting discrimination is to understand which groups are being targeted. Additionally I made that statement only after another poster tried to claim that immigration had nothing to do with skin color. My point in that post was to identify that trumps immigration policies are indeed racially motivated. Of course there are plenty of members here who want to twist words around to make them sound like something which was not intended.
Im from the Chicago area bro! Republican party at least Trump has nothing to do with this your conspiracy theories are old dude! Federal documents on Trump's helping butigedge ok copy and paste on here. Lol why would Trump be huge if these are documents they impeach or try with no crime bit he is paying for butigedge to win Iowa makes a lot of frickin sense lol. I hope you go see a therapist u maybe mentally ill!!!!!!! Dude theirs no fed documents why didn't shifty Schiff say this during impeachment then and then squirted lol your nuts bro!!!
That's why you're being called racist.
Context matters.
