The Impeachment Of Donald Trump

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
tRUmp told the truth about the Saudis giving 1 billion for military protection, he just forgot to mention that he got the money, not the USA.


If Trump loses the election or gets impeached, MBS will most likely lose his head! They will chop the fucking thing off in Saudi if the CIA are let loose on his ass, he has a lot of enemies at home.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The dear leader has a decree.


He'll lose his mind before this is done, if the senate has a full trial with witnesses and a secret vote, Donald might just be suddenly fucked and Pence would be POTUS. Donald's downfall could be sudden and deep, I'm sure there are indictments waiting for him when he is out of office, I don't think Pence would pardon anybody under these circumstances, especially Donald! I wonder if Donald has been ragging on Pence for a pardon for himself? If he could have got a Pence pardon he would have resigned by now, no way would Pence touch that hot potato.

I think the idea of a short trial without witnesses was for Donald's consumption, I figure Mitch might fuck him on the trial while avoiding the blame. Why would he and Lindsey say stupid shit before the trial about it being in the bag for Trump? Once they take the trial oath they won't speak like that! Besides Donald liked it, even though it practically guaranteed a full trial, the latest Lev Parnas revelations and documents made sure of that. The dye has been cast.

I figure a full trial with witnesses and a secret vote by the senate...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Donald attracts slimeballs like flies to shit! How many fucking crooks does this guy consort with, I've lost count! Jesus, talk about trial of the century, the trials will go on for a century! There'll be a hundred grand juries before they're done. It was a wise move for the prison guards union to back Trump, he will provide them with lots of work and job security.
 

efi2

Well-Known Member
Leaders???
In the USA they are supose to represent
WE THE PEOPLE.
That is not happening
The followers will follow .
 

efi2

Well-Known Member
Russians don't have gun rights,

How are you still alive?
hey, *psss*, check this out: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/justice-dept- [QUOTE="shimbob, post: 15256365, member: 983112"] hey, *psss*, check this out: [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/justice-dept-winds-down-clinton-related-inquiry-once-championed-by-trump-it-found-nothing-of-consequence/2020/01/09/ca83932e-32f9-11ea-a053-dc6d944ba776_story.html
Could not read the post you pasted lm on old table just both menu and ads asking me to subscripe i will look elsewhere.not a fan of mockingbird media
Till than
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
BBC's assessment of the China "Trade Deal":

Winners: Donald Trump and President Xi. Also, Mexico, Vietnam, Taiwan and other global competitors of the US.

Losers: American consumers and businesses.

But hey, rednecks are still white. So there's that.

MAGA, motherfuckers!
Walmart prices go up and farmers get federal welfare because of tariffs and fucked over by permanently lost markets.
 

efi2

Well-Known Member
Russians don't have gun rights,

How are you still alive?
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
Take a picture of an American gas pump
 

SFnone

Well-Known Member
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
what did you cut and paste that? you didn't write that... no way from the way you talk, could you mr "AMERICAN" write that.
 

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
Komrade, your Borscht is showing.
 
Top