The Impeachment Of Donald Trump

DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
captainmorgan said:
tRUmp told the truth about the Saudis giving 1 billion for military protection, he just forgot to mention that he got the money, not the USA.


www.middleeasteye.net

Crown Prince bin Salman 'bribed' Trump, Saudi Twitter whistleblower claims

Mujtahidd alleges that boat linked to Trump's organisation was filled with $1bn in cash as a personal gift from bin Salman
www.middleeasteye.net www.middleeasteye.net
Click to expand...
If Trump loses the election or gets impeached, MBS will most likely lose his head! They will chop the fucking thing off in Saudi if the CIA are let loose on his ass, he has a lot of enemies at home.
 
Last edited:
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
captainmorgan said:
The dear leader has a decree.


www.politicususa.com

Trump Demands That The Senate Not Hold His Impeachment Trial

In a tweet, Trump called on the Senate not hold an impeachment trial and to dismiss the articles of impeachment against him.
www.politicususa.com www.politicususa.com
Click to expand...
He'll lose his mind before this is done, if the senate has a full trial with witnesses and a secret vote, Donald might just be suddenly fucked and Pence would be POTUS. Donald's downfall could be sudden and deep, I'm sure there are indictments waiting for him when he is out of office, I don't think Pence would pardon anybody under these circumstances, especially Donald! I wonder if Donald has been ragging on Pence for a pardon for himself? If he could have got a Pence pardon he would have resigned by now, no way would Pence touch that hot potato.

I think the idea of a short trial without witnesses was for Donald's consumption, I figure Mitch might fuck him on the trial while avoiding the blame. Why would he and Lindsey say stupid shit before the trial about it being in the bag for Trump? Once they take the trial oath they won't speak like that! Besides Donald liked it, even though it practically guaranteed a full trial, the latest Lev Parnas revelations and documents made sure of that. The dye has been cast.

I figure a full trial with witnesses and a secret vote by the senate...
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
captainmorgan said:
www.politico.com

Judge confirms Trump associate gave feds Osama bin Laden’s number

Felix Sater, who became an FBI informant after pleading guilty in a 1998 fraud scheme, later helped drive talks for a potential Trump Tower Moscow.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
Click to expand...
Donald attracts slimeballs like flies to shit! How many fucking crooks does this guy consort with, I've lost count! Jesus, talk about trial of the century, the trials will go on for a century! There'll be a hundred grand juries before they're done. It was a wise move for the prison guards union to back Trump, he will provide them with lots of work and job security.
 
efi2

efi2

Well-Known Member
Leaders???
In the USA they are supose to represent
WE THE PEOPLE.
That is not happening
The followers will follow .
 
efi2

efi2

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Russians don't have gun rights,

How are you still alive?
Click to expand...
shimbob said:
hey, *psss*, check this out: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/justice-dept- [QUOTE="shimbob, post: 15256365, member: 983112"] hey, *psss*, check this out: [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/justice-dept-winds-down-clinton-related-inquiry-once-championed-by-trump-it-found-nothing-of-consequence/2020/01/09/ca83932e-32f9-11ea-a053-dc6d944ba776_story.html
Click to expand...
Could not read the post you pasted lm on old table just both menu and ads asking me to subscripe i will look elsewhere.not a fan of mockingbird media
Till than
www.judicialwatch.org

Judicial Watch Sues Justice and State Departments for Uranium One Records - Judicial Watch

Clinton operations receive tens of millions of dollars of contributions from Uranium One/Russia Interests (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of State for all...
www.judicialwatch.org
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
BBC's assessment of the China "Trade Deal":

Winners: Donald Trump and President Xi. Also, Mexico, Vietnam, Taiwan and other global competitors of the US.

Losers: American consumers and businesses.

But hey, rednecks are still white. So there's that.

MAGA, motherfuckers!
Click to expand...
Walmart prices go up and farmers get federal welfare because of tariffs and fucked over by permanently lost markets.
 
efi2

efi2

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Russians don't have gun rights,

How are you still alive?
Click to expand...
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
efi2 said:
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
Click to expand...
Take a picture of an American gas pump
 
SFnone

SFnone

Well-Known Member
efi2 said:
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
Click to expand...
what did you cut and paste that? you didn't write that... no way from the way you talk, could you mr "AMERICAN" write that.
 
rkymtnman

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
efi2 said:
An AMERICAN HERE!
There is a practical reason for the right to keep and bear arms. Courts have held that neither the state nor the police owe a duty to protect the individual. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); Hernandez v. City of Goshen, U.S.C.A. 7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2003; Zelig v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 1112, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (2002); Ashburn v. Anne Arundel County, 306 Md. 617, 510 A.2d 1078 (1986); Everton v. Willard, 468 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1983); Weiner v. Metro Transportation Authority, 55 N.Y.2d 175, 448 N.Y.S.2d 141 (1982); Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. 1981). One federal court even boldly proclaimed that “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen.” Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).
Click to expand...
Komrade, your Borscht is showing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top