Some people. Time to hit the pipe. Packed with some of my home grown Critical Mass this time. Save the Hindu Kush for bedtime.Wrong.
Wrong.
Wrong.
Kerosene lamp - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
@OldMedUser I hope you get help with your addiction man, sorry to hear about it. I fear that, if this man's theories are correct, we may all indeed....be crack smoking crack smokers - who knows?
Wait...
...And it's reached insane levels.
I'm just trying to add to the humor.
Just for fun, I'll disagree on this point. Most references to "Lamp Oil" that I've found are referring to paraffin oil. Paraffin oil is a more refined version of kerosene, not the other way around, id est, one could obtain paraffin oil from the kerosene but not kerosene from the paraffin oil.
Me too.
But they don't make it from kerosene, they make them both from crude oil. So could you call lamp oil crude oil because you can make one from the other?
True, they both come out of the fractional distillation process at the same point, but kerosene has all the constituents of paraffin oil whereas paraffin oil doesn't contain all the constituents of kerosene, therefore you could obtain paraffin oil from the kerosene but not kerosene from paraffin oil.
No, for the same reason, It's one way. Crude oil has all the constituents of paraffin oil whereas paraffin oil doesn't contain all the constituents of crude oil. I could make "lamp oil" from crude oil but not the other way around.
It's not the other way. I didn't call crude oil lamp oil, I called lamp oil crude oil, retard.
I just got mine. I love it! The heat is definitely not a problem, although I probably will hook up water cooling in the summer. The main problem is the humidity it causes, especially considering that I need to lower my humidity levels to account for the reduction in transpiration caused by the increased water use efficiency caused by high CO2 levels.
Fuck man, that sucks. I've been looking into co2 gens a little bit and was concerned about the water vapor (and heat) they produce - I didn't really know how much of an issue it was.I think I'm going to have to get a second dehumidifier.
On the bright side my veg tent in the next room is at 950ppm. About 100ppm of that is from a mushroom bag, but still.
I live in a really wet climate and my 70 pint dehu is overworked as it is. I changed my ventilation so it vented into the same room instead of another room which cut off the flow of moist air from the other room and the dehu didn't work nearly as often. I just need to get a second dehu for the other room where my veg tent and a bunch of house plants are. It's also the source of the humidity coming in from outside, whereas my flower room is much better sealed.
Without optimal lighting the plants can't utilize the extra CO2 so that advice is assbackwards. Optimal lighting will cause the plants to need more CO2 to more effectively use it. When using CO2 everything needs to be optimized or it's a total waste.
That's not true. CO2 increases yield even at the same light intensity. I have heard that myth too and it's why I didn't get CO2 until recently.
I was talking about sub-par lighting. If you have just enough lighting to grow decently then adding CO2 won't do much. Growers who use CO2 regularly are running much higher light, nute and temp levels to hit max growth and yields. If anything is less than optimal they won't grow any faster than that limiting value.
Yes it will, read the graph. You need to lay off that crack pipe.