The Impeachment Of Donald Trump

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
So dont listen to CNN or listen to CNN, I'm confused by this whole post. Kinda went full circle on the lies lol.
If it is a reported item on CNN, generally it is true or told to them by very credible sources, not that they can't get burnt, but most of the time they report facts. The commentators you can take with a grain of salt, how they interpret the facts. But generally they don't hide facts like sites like OANN, the new newsman thing, Fox now except Wallace on Sunday is mostly a waste too since they cut out so much of the stories.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
How did she do that exactly?
She made two trips to Syria. One with other congressmen to visit the rebel side of the lines and all but her came back to report on Assad's war crimes and conditions. Then she went alone to visit Assad and went on proctored managed tours. She came back supporting Assad and never once mentioned his crimes against humanity. She never once mentioned his torture camps, bombing hospitals, bombing civilians, using poison gas as a weapon of terror.



Pressed on whether or not she would consider Assad a "torturer" and a "murderer," Gabbard described her take as "one of a soldier, where I've seen the cost of war firsthand."

"there are bad people on both sides" is basically what she said about Assad's crimes against humanity.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
She also admitted to trying to make all the candidates look good and giving them all potential questions.
Yep, She said she did the same for others. But that's how propaganda works. They dwell only on what they want useful idiots to see. I do agree with him that CNN is a biased news source. Unbiased news sources are careful to point out what you just said. He on the other hand is quoting from a different biased source.

Bernie lost because one debate question about the Flint water supply crisis was leaked to Clinton's campaign and Bernie was leaked others. LOL Even if that's true, it's the right outcome. What a weak argument for "rigged". These Bernie babies (if that's what he is) come across as dupes.
 

Glovelove

Well-Known Member
She made two trips to Syria. One with other congressmen to visit the rebel side of the lines and all but her came back to report on Assad's war crimes and conditions. Then she went alone to visit Assad and went on proctored managed tours. She came back supporting Assad and never once mentioned his crimes against humanity. She never once mentioned his torture camps, bombing hospitals, bombing civilians, using poison gas as a weapon of terror.



Pressed on whether or not she would consider Assad a "torturer" and a "murderer," Gabbard described her take as "one of a soldier, where I've seen the cost of war firsthand."

"there are bad people on both sides" is basically what she said about Assad's crimes against humanity.
What part about "there are bad people on both sides " is wrong or misleading?
Where do you think American presidents rank in civilian deaths by use of military force? Are you old enough to remember Vietnam and how fucked up soldiers were coming back from there? Have you ever torched a village just to smoke out a handful of charlie?
Stfu punk. Tulsi 2020
Biden is a piece of shit. Who also was vice president as " the Russians hacked the elections " in which his main man Obama said there was "no interference " in our elections lol. Do you idiots forget about all the stupid shit those 2 said on tape about the elections as they were happening?
I can link it ?
Dont not respond to this message, I do not approve you to do so hahaha :wall:
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
She made two trips to Syria. One with other congressmen to visit the rebel side of the lines and all but her came back to report on Assad's war crimes and conditions. Then she went alone to visit Assad and went on proctored managed tours. She came back supporting Assad and never once mentioned his crimes against humanity. She never once mentioned his torture camps, bombing hospitals, bombing civilians, using poison gas as a weapon of terror.



Pressed on whether or not she would consider Assad a "torturer" and a "murderer," Gabbard described her take as "one of a soldier, where I've seen the cost of war firsthand."

"there are bad people on both sides" is basically what she said about Assad's crimes against humanity.
Where in that article, or elsewhere, does it say she supports Assad? Sounds to me like she met with him in an attempt to resolve conflict and save american lives, but that's bad? Here's what she said in the article you posted:

"I will never apologize for doing all that I can to prevent more of my brothers and sisters from being sent into harm's way, to fight counter-productive regime-change wars that make our country less safe, that take more lives, and that cost taxpayers trillions more dollars," she added. "So if that means meeting with a dictator, or meeting with an adversary, absolutely. I would do it. This is about the national security of our country."
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
What part about "there are bad people on both sides " is wrong or misleading?
Where do you think American presidents rank in civilian deaths by use of military force? Are you old enough to remember Vietnam and how fucked up soldiers were coming back from there? Have you ever torched a village just to smoke out a handful of charlie?
Stfu punk. Tulsi 2020
Biden is a piece of shit. Who also was vice president as " the Russians hacked the elections " in which his main man Obama said there was "no interference " in our elections lol. Do you idiots forget about all the stupid shit those 2 said on tape about the elections as they were happening?
I can link it ?
Dont not respond to this message, I do not approve you to do so hahaha :wall:
A lot of people like spicy mustard.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Subpoena Deadline Today For Docs From Mick Mulvaney, Perry | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC
Time is officially running out for acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to turn over documents to Congressional investigators and all signs show that he does not plan to comply. NBC’s Leigh Ann Caldwell, former Congresswoman Liz Holtzman and NBC’s Jonathan Allen join Stephanie Ruhle to break down what happens next. Aired on 10/18/19.
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
In my opinion, issue the parents a warning, give them help for 6 months, if they cant do it then, they risk losing their kids.
To whom? Have you thought of the price of raising a child? Who wants that expense without it being tax deductible ? (tax base gets smaller)

Help the child to not grow up like their parents while showing compassion to victims of life. (Health/Mental care teaches one how not to be lazy)
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Yes, my girl saved my life. 20 years next summer. She was my saving grace. I wish it was easy, life is hard and never fair. And yes, we cant just toss people like plants.
Nice, similar with me and my wife.

Yep, She said she did the same for others. But that's how propaganda works. They dwell only on what they want useful idiots to see. I do agree with him that CNN is a biased news source. Unbiased news sources are careful to point out what you just said. He on the other hand is quoting from a different biased source.
I don't really watch CNN so don't really know anything about their shows. I always figured they were like Fox, you can see what they are saying to see if they try to spin what facts they are covering that day and how they are spinning them, and then mostly MSNBC for just back round noise and breaking news stuff.

But I haven't seen anything that could be seen as Russian propaganda for the left coming out of CNN other than planted stories here and there that the other news fall for and they report it. It is funny that Trump's minions were 'leaking' all these things and the people keep acting like they are credible sources for so long basing stories on what they said.
 

turbobuzz

Well-Known Member
It's much easier to constantly cry about getting rid of someone you don't like instead of getting a better candidate. Biden, Warren, Sanders? No wonder why the dims are trying to oust someone instead of beating him. Even the dims know their candidates are so horrific they don't have a chance.
You've got to part of the MAGATS because you can't spell Dems?
 
Top