New Zealands new gun buy back scheme.

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Every thread he posts in is derailed to try to convince everyone that child sexual consent laws are wrong, taxation is slavery and civil rights are rape.

Every single premise to every single conclusion he has argued, relied upon redefinition of relevant words and hypothetical scenarios and never upon reality. This is without variation or exception since I have been posting here. He has never premised his dystopian fantasy world view with facts or by citing empirical research.

When he loses, as he always and invariably does, he just starts posting memes. He has literally been making the same pro-pedo arguments for the better part of a decade.
 

hotrodharley

Well-Known Member
Every thread he posts in is derailed to try to convince everyone that child sexual consent laws are wrong, taxation is slavery and civil rights are rape.

Every single premise to every single conclusion he has argued relied upon redefining words and hypothetical scenarios and never upon reality. This is without variation or exception since I have been posting here. He has never premised his dystopian fantasy world view with facts or by citing empirical research.

When he loses, as he always and invariably does, he just starts posting memes. He has literally been making the same pro-pedo arguments for the better part of a decade.
He’s as transparent as new glass.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Every thread he posts in is derailed to try to convince everyone that child sexual consent laws are wrong, taxation is slavery and civil rights are rape.

Every single premise to every single conclusion he has argued relied upon redefining words and hypothetical scenarios and never upon reality. This is without variation or exception since I have been posting here. He has never premised his dystopian fantasy world view with facts or by citing empirical research.

When he loses, as he always and invariably does, he just starts posting memes. He has literally been making the same pro-pedo arguments for the better part of a decade.

If a law in one state says consent is one age, but another state says it is another, are both laws correct?

Is there like some magical invisible "confers consent pixie dust" that radiates at the borders of some legal jurisdictions ?


If an "anarchist" is a government advocate and apologist, should he get some air and get out his mom's basement? (rhetorical question Fake Anarchist)
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
Every thread he posts in is derailed to try to convince everyone that child sexual consent laws are wrong, taxation is slavery and civil rights are rape.

Every single premise to every single conclusion he has argued, relied upon redefinition of relevant words and hypothetical scenarios and never upon reality. This is without variation or exception since I have been posting here. He has never premised his dystopian fantasy world view with facts or by citing empirical research.

When he loses, as he always and invariably does, he just starts posting memes. He has literally been making the same pro-pedo arguments for the better part of a decade.


Exactly! The problem is not that Rob Roy posts his drivel, it's that every pea-brain QUOTES him!

He responds to every quote, and does not answer your questions, and just continues his constant blather. It's never-ending! :roll:


:mrgreen:
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Exactly! The problem is not that Rob Roy posts his drivel, it's that every pea-brain QUOTES him!

He responds to every quote, and does not answer your questions, and just continues his constant blather. It's never-ending! :roll:


:mrgreen:
That's why I'm not going to address him directly anymore or click reply to his posts.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I’ll grant you this much. You are the silliest motherfucker I’ve encountered anywhere in years. Again since I retired from the prison system. You’d have lots of company that thinks like you in the joint. Especially guys loving little kids.
So you helped with the kidnapping of people for growing plants that you now grow? I hope you've apologized to the people you aided in harming.

The only thing worse than that would be claiming you're an Anarchist while living in your mom's basement eagerly waiting for a government check to come and support you.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
So if consent in a human relationship is important to you, (it should be) why do you support using force to make some people associate with or serve people that person prefers not to ? Why are you taking a huge dump on consent ?

I bet you don't answer that question.

Bonus, prove you are not a reindeer.
Show me where have I stated that I support forcing someone to serve another, If they feel they are being forced to serve someone then they should not be in a position that requires them to do so, like a public place of business you idiot. There is a social contract that if you work in the service industry you serve people, no picking and choosing.......again idiot. As for the reindeer possibility well ok if you want to believe I’m a reindeer I’m ok with that.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Exactly! The problem is not that Rob Roy posts his drivel, it's that every pea-brain QUOTES him!

He responds to every quote, and does not answer your questions, and just continues his constant blather. It's never-ending! :roll:


:mrgreen:
Maybe because he is furthering the cause to rape kids and hiding it in a consent argument that we respond. Maybe it’s time to ban this MF’er then it would end.
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
Maybe because he is furthering the cause to rape kids and hiding it in a consent argument that we respond. Maybe it’s time to ban this MF’er then it would end.

No, that's not right. It's an open forum, and anyone can post what they like, and as long as I don't find it to be offensive, then it's OK. He enjoys posting or he would stop. Other members enjoy responding to him, or they would stop. So everyone is enjoying themselves posting in this forum.

Except for me when I have to read it. :lol:


:mrgreen:
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
No, that's not right. It's an open forum, and anyone can post what they like, and as long as I don't find it to be offensive, then it's OK. He enjoys posting or he would stop. Other members enjoy responding to him, or they would stop. So everyone is enjoying themselves posting in this forum.

Except for me when I have to read it. :lol:


:mrgreen:
So you're not offended by years of arguments pro pedophilia?
 

Aussieaceae

Well-Known Member
Post deleted as well. Great, maybe i deserved it, but he deserves the reaction he gets for trolling in the way he does. It's not right.

Your question is odd. It implies that a law is what confers the ability to consent upon a person.
Are you saying if the age of consent were raised to 35, that a 34 year old would somehow lose their ability to consent to something ?
See, comments like this one deny the existence of a childs development. Seriously, he deserves the reaction he receives. Exactly the reaction he's looking for, he's a sicko.

What else is he trying to achieve here, besides a bunch of triggered members?
 

Aussieaceae

Well-Known Member
He's on ignore now too. Think I'm just about done with this place too. Not going to reply or comment here anymore, and he fully deserves anything that eventually may come to him.

He doesn't care at all what any other member may, or may not have experienced throughout their lives. Not one ounce of compassion, to avoid offending someone else. That's malicious behaviour on his part.

Goodbye.
 
Top