Majority Backs ‘Medicare for All’ Replacing Private Plans, if Preferred Providers Stay

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
I agree.

But more social leverage = more social responsibility.

That's not to so my behavioral resignating complacency doesn't contribute to the problem. It'd be hypocritically for me to state I don't partake in the privileges of capitalism. Social problems are overwhelmingly large, complex & contradictory elephants
Would barter be better than fiat currency or do you want money based on shiny things?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
That's not to so my behavioral resignating complacency doesn't contribute to the problem. It'd be hypocritically for me to state I don't partake in the privileges of capitalism. Social problems are overwhelmingly large, complex & contradictory elephants
Everyone takes advantage of capitalism, from the first time a farmer had too much crops and traded it for something he needed it. Capitalism as a word doesn't really mean any one thing anymore.

And totally agree, as soon as people realize we are not cogs in some complex machine, we are just the bacteria on its surface.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Aw, don't be so cynical!



I voted for Trump. Of the 2 options the elites gave us, I preferred him over Hillary. Lesser of 2 evils.

It's not like either elitest isn't going to gaslight the american public. It's in the hierarchy's participants best short-term interest to preserve their position within their own constituencies. Power consolidation generally happens from the top down.
Only someone that voted for Trump could think that the spoiled rich kid that was given a couple million dollars from his dad by the age of 3 is the same as a woman (totally establishment in a male dominated world) who grew up in a middle class family and worked hard all her life to get to where she got.
 

principlesarelife

Active Member
I
I have finely tuned idiot detection systems. Like I said, you lost me at fiat currency.

So answer my question, barter or shiny things?
So you want to corner my reply into answering your non sequitur to delegitimize my contribution to the discussion?

Precious

Everyone takes advantage of capitalism, from the first time a farmer had too much crops and traded it for something he needed it. Capitalism as a word doesn't really mean any one thing anymore.

And totally agree, as soon as people realize we are not cogs in some complex machine, we are just the bacteria on its surface.
I agree with your 1st paragraph.

But I have to disagree with your second paragraph. I've adopted conclusions from reading friendly facism, the irony of democracy & a lil karl marx.

From one objectifying financial perspective, the elites understand better than most that we're all vulernably economically dependent upon the capitalist system. They understand that they too can lose their wealth. Exhibit a. Rothschilds marry family to consolidate their dynasty.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Aw, don't be so cynical!



I voted for Trump. Of the 2 options the elites gave us, I preferred him over Hillary. Lesser of 2 evils.

It's not like either elitest isn't going to gaslight the american public. It's in the hierarchy's participants best short-term interest to preserve their position within their own constituencies. Power consolidation generally happens from the top down.
now that you've seen Trump in action, do you still support him?
 
Last edited:

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
I


So you want to corner my reply into answering your non sequitur to delegitimize my contribution to the discussion?

Precious



I agree with your 1st paragraph.

But I have to disagree with your second paragraph. I've adopted conclusions from reading friendly facism, the irony of democracy & a lil karl marx.

From one objectifying financial perspective, the elites understand better than most that we're all vulernably economically dependent upon the capitalist system. They understand that they too can lose their wealth. Exhibit a. Rothschilds marry family to consolidate their dynasty.
Soooo, money based on Majik the Gathering cards?

You are the guy who just happened to show up in politics three weeks after joining after making the usual dozen or so low grade posts in other forums. Gosh, we have never seen that before. I suspect you will stick around until next year's election.

So you hate fiat money. What is your ingenious solution?
 
Last edited:

principlesarelife

Active Member
Only someone that voted for Trump could think that the spoiled rich kid that was given a couple million dollars from his dad by the age of 3 is the same as a woman (totally establishment in a male dominated world) who grew up in a middle class family and worked hard all her life to get to where she got.
Who said they were the same characters? I'd appreciate if you ceased from resorting to the tired strategy of polarizing my poltical posturing, like televised corporate media does 24/7.

Culture persists to perpetuate itself. That's just the way it is right now.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Soooo, money based on Majik the Gathering cards?

You are the guy who just happened to show up in politics three weeks after joining after making the usual dozen or so low grade posts in other forums. Gosh, we have never seen that before. I suspect you will stick around until next year's election.

So you hate fiat money. What is you ingenuous solution?
desperate much?..no one's even talking to you.
 

principlesarelife

Active Member
Soooo, money based on Majik the Gathering cards?

You are the guy who just happened to show up in politics three weeks after joining after making the usual dozen or so low grade posts in other forums. Gosh, we have never seen that before. I suspect you will stick around until next year's election.

So you hate fiat money. What is you ingenuous solution?
You seem bent on using logical fallacies like ad hominem. slippery slopes, straw manning, tu quoque & special pleading. You too may also enjoy this website: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Certainly not. People who rage about the Rothschilds are usually super progressive.

Get your head out of your ass.
This logical fallacy seems to mirror "the texas sharpshooter." Who was raging about the Rothschilds? psych projection, much?

now that you've seen Trump in action, do you still support him?
Would you please be more specific?
 
Last edited:

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
You seem bent on using logical fallacies like ad hominem. slippery slopes, straw manning, tu quoque & special pleading. You too may also enjoy this website: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/



This logical fallacy seems to mirror "the texas sharpshooter." Who was raging about the Rothschilds? psych projection, much?




Would you please be more specific?
Lol. I knew you were going to mention straw man.

You are hopelessly transparent. Go drink some Hawthorne.
 
Top