squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
explain how this would influence the 2016 election at all
WaPo, CNN Virtually Silent After NYT Reveals 2nd FBI Spy Sent To Infiltrate Trump Campaign
- Thread starter squarepush3r
- Start date
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The crime is conspiracy with a foreign power to influence a US election, and not "influencing the 2016". I doubt you understand the difference. After all, you don't understand the difference between climate and weather.
Last edited:
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
We have extensive proof of Hillary campaign working with Ukraine and Russia. The Steele dossier was a paid for fabricated document by Hillary's campaign and literally Russian intelligence to attempt to influence the 2016 election. Also Hillary's Russia ties are extensive and go back to pay-for-play Clinton Foundation favors and huge money transactions.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
The worst part of you being stupid is you are stupid.
The Steele dossier was first paid for by Repukes doing the Repuke primaries, Clinton picks it up after.
Do you enjoy being stupid or are you trying not to be ?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The Steele dossier again. Your kind never give up no matter how stale the conspiracy theory gets. That was investigated by Republican controlled House and Senate committees and the conclusion was that there is no evidence of the Hillary campaign did anything illegal. What part of "NO EVIDENCE" do you not understand.
The insinuation that legally aquiring publicly available information on Manafort from Ukraine is equivalent to conspiring with Russia to time the release of stolen e-mails in order to influence the election is odious. More accurately said, it's a fucking lie.
The Mueller report documents plenty of evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government and accepted their aid to stage the release of stolen e-mails. There is no evidence to support your claims about Clinton. Yes, I'm calling you stupid and a stupid liar at that.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
In April 2016, attorneys for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC separately hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while The Free Beacon stopped its backing in May of 2016.[2] In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier.
1) Wikileaks is not Russia or controlled by Russia
2) "Because I said so" is not evidence
3) Wikileak already announced the date of the drop
4) The actual content Wikileaks was release, was DNC (who was working with Russia) rigging the election against Bernie Sanders (among other). So again your argument is crazy on many different levels.
DonJr.TheMoron
Well-Known Member
It's called an investigation you F'n Trumptard.
topcat
Well-Known Member
"Make the lie big, make it simple, say it often and eventually, they will believe it."
"If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes truth."
From the Nazi playbook of Hitler and Goebbles. Trump is a functional illiterate, but he remembers someone telling him this. Likely Roy Cohn, who was disbarred.
"If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes truth."
From the Nazi playbook of Hitler and Goebbles. Trump is a functional illiterate, but he remembers someone telling him this. Likely Roy Cohn, who was disbarred.
Last edited:
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The Mueller report documents more than a hundred times when Trump, Trump campaign officials and agents of the Russian government secretly discussed how to influence the election. The report goes on to document ten instances when Trump materially interfered -- obstructed -- the special investigation when it sought to obtain information or evidence on Russian interference in our election.
You can pick at that plate, smile and say "how good" it is if you like. Do that all you want but you'll never be able to convince anyone that it's not covered with corruption.
What do you say? Because the Mueller report says the DOJ doesn't have the power to indict the president, the president is innocent.
Way to spin it boys.
More than half of the people in this country say they believe the president is guilty. Trump is guilty in the court of public opinion. That's a good start at getting rid of his expensive ass.
After the New York Times revealed that the FBI sent a second spy to infiltrate the Trump campaign during the 2016 US election - a 'honeypot' who went by the name of Azra Turk who posed as a research assistant to the first spy they sent in, Stefan Halper - the rest of the MSM has been virtually silent.
Both the Washington Post and CNN - which breathlessly reported on their peers' anonymously-sourced anti-Trump propaganda for two years - have somehow failed to write a single article mentioning Azra Turk.
View attachment 4327463
View attachment 4327464
As the Times revealed on Thursday, the FBI operative who went by the name Azra Turk repeatedly flirted with Trump aide George Papadopoulos during their encounters as well as in email exchanges according to an October, 2018 Daily Caller report, confirmed by the Times.
While in London in 2016, Ms. Turk exchanged emails with Mr. Papadopoulos, saying meeting him had been the “highlight of my trip,” according to messages provided by Mr. Papadopoulos.
“I am excited about what the future holds for us,” she wrote. -New York Times
And as the Times makes clear, "the FBI sent her to London as part of the counterintelligence inquiry opened that summer" to investigate the Trump campaign.
View attachment 4327467
CNN has made mention of the report on-air, yet they haven't written a single article mentioning "Azra Turk."
View attachment 4327471
Meanwhile, a Russian-born academic falsely accused of being a Kremlin 'honeypot' operative against Mike Flynn, Svetlana Lokhova, has an interesting theory as to why the Times published the '2nd spy' revalation in the first place.
View attachment 4327473
View attachment 4327474
View attachment 4327475
View attachment 4327476
View attachment 4327477
View attachment 4327478
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-03/wapo-cnn-refuse-acknowledge-2nd-fbi-spy-sent-infiltrate-trump-campaign
geeze, if i got a report that a potential candidate was deep in bed with the russians, i'd investigate it too- that's his right as president.
the russians are not our friends.
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
I 2nd that thought, and I'll bet ALL the Trump supporting right wing cocksuckers on this site never grew a plant in their lives, because their all a bunch of cunts that don't have the balls to do it.
Wanna bet?
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
What do you mean?
Liberals did the dirty work?
Explain please, and I hope your not talking about the Steele dossier.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Im talking about FISA court abuse for the purpose of gaining political advantage. We will see but I hear the FISA courts are working with IG on exposing this issue in the near future.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Yeah, we’ll see alright!
Remember that one memo that was supposed to change everything too?
Retard
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Manafort literally told trump to campaign in different places based on the help he got from Russia after sharing the internal polling data with them
'..but I hear'.
Its extremely difficult to obtain FISA and must be approved by a Grand Jury in which there is so much evidence beyond a shadow of doubt with reasonable guilt present to get past the 1A aspect.
Reading is fundamental- try it sometime.
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Will do, I’d like to start by reading about the grand jury that approves FISA warrants, could you refer me to that info? Much appreciated, can’t wait to read up about it.'..but I hear'.
Its extremely difficult to obtain FISA and must be approved by a Grand Jury in which there is so much evidence beyond a shadow of doubt with reasonable guilt present to get past the 1A aspect.
Reading is fundamental- try it sometime.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Four Republican judges reviewed the FISA application four different times
It is the hardest warrant for anyone to get
Nunes is a traitor to America just like dear leader