Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You've demonstrated your determined ignorance and I am under no obligation to help you. A quick glance at the definition of impeachment will show you it means the same as indictment in a different setting.Please cite one instance of Congress impeaching someone . . . where it was referred to as an indictment. Impeachment is a political act by Congress. Indictments are done by law enforcement via the Executive branch. Two completely different acts done by different entities, with different outcomes.
No wonder your Country is so messed up.
Hell, show me a quote from anyone in Congress that ever said they can indict someone.
Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body levels charges against a government official. It does not mean removal from office; it is only a statement of charges, akin to an indictment in criminal law.
They are both charges leveled at a person. The DOJ has been advised that it cannot indict a sitting president so it is up to Congress to do the job. You are hung up on a technicality when in fact the Mueller Report states that Trump comitted the crime of obstructing justice. So you pose a stupid argument about hairsplitting the difference between indict vs impeach. Too funny that Trumpkins have turned into hairsplitting psuedo-lawyers in order to avoid admitting they have been made fools of by Trump.
I'm still waiting to learn what you mean when you use the word "fact". You clearly aren't using it as it is commonly used.