A version?Greetings from Russia
There is a version that Skripal was poisoned by employees of GRU whom he ratted out. Special services caught him back in the 2000s. The fact that he lived to 2018 means that he was pardoned by government. To poison him being under sanctions also before the elections — there was no sense.
This of course does not negate the fact that Putin is murderer and dictator.
lol I lead a grow report here.Do you get a salary or are you paid per post?
So many questions.
SIgh.lol I lead a grow report here.
I know who kills journalists, poisons the opposition, starts wars with neighboring countries and puts citizens in prison for memes (this is not a joke).
But in the case of Skripal
- Why Skripal survived?
- England said that they don't have Novichok, so how did they find out it was him and how did they find the antidote in a short time?
- I read two news reports. In first - British chemists said that the novichok is not from the Russian laboratory. In the second - from Russian. Which truthfully do not know.
- England did not provide evidence and refused to question these GRU officers.
- Putin said that Boshirov (Chepiga) and Petrov (Mishkin) civilians, but they were from the special services (and obviously they're guilty).
I'm not saying that Putin isn't the killer. I'm just saying there's a lot of weird inconsistencies.
This is a closed investigation. UK police don't even comment on the news reports. What all you read - is media investigations. Perhaps information about route gru officers in Salisbury official. But not sure.England has provided plenty of evidence and refused to be drawn into Putin's one-sided dance
Yeah, show me the story that the British scientists said the Novichok did nb
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichokWe were able to identify it as novichok, to identify it was a military-grade nerve agent. We have not verified the precise source, but we have provided the scientific information to the government, who have then used a number of other sources to piece together the conclusions that they have come to.
always glad to read objectively unbiased judgmentsPutin manufacturing weird inconsistencies.
Putin "Chechnian bombs".
anybody that betrays Putin will die.
powerful message
Russians have always been like that. Serfdom, feudalism, Horde yoke, monarchy, communism, military pseudo-democracy now. This is a centuries-old selection. So I laugh at the racial (black) quota in the Hollywood film industrypeople who are slavish and ignorant
The story you posted does not say that the poison was not manufactured by Russia. It says that the did not verify where it was made. That is a very different thing. They also explained that it was not within their expertise to say where it came from, only what it was.This is a closed investigation. UK police don't even comment on the news reports. What all you read - is media investigations. Perhaps information about route gru officers in Salisbury official. But not sure.
always glad to read objectively unbiased judgments
I repeat again. I believe that the Russian government is guilty. But there are a lot of non-obvious things in this case. Reference to Putin's past murders is not proof.
Russians have always been like that. Serfdom, feudalism, Horde yoke, monarchy, communism, military pseudo-democracy now. This is a centuries-old selection. So I laugh at the racial (black) quota in the Hollywood film industry
Caitlyn Johnstone vouched for him.So Putin is friend?
Hey mountain man, why does a dead fish on a beach get less believable?The story of the former spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter's poisoning just seems to get less and less believable the longer it sits, like a dead fish on the beach.
After all this time, no discussion of the medical condition of either victim. No discussion of the medical status of the policeman who found them at all, including whether it might be related or not.
Even stranger, the free admission that a doctor who arrived at the scene within minutes of their discovery has been absolutely unaffected.
Yet, the official narrative that 'Russia did it!!' is unsupported by facts or by the chemical weapons experts themselves.
Worse, the official story will brook no dissent; anyone crass enough to dare ask for actual evidence is immediately smeared as a Russian sympathizer, witness Jeremy Corbyn's treatment in recent days.
This whole thing stinks. It stinks of another thin excuse to start yet another war or to justify expanding one, the most obvious candidate being Syria where the Russian backed Assad regime clearly has the upper hand.
We aren't being told the whole truth. In fact, we are arguably not being told any of it.
Links to follow.
Hey clown shoes, do you even have a reference?Hey mountain man, why does a dead fish on a beach get less believable?
Strike one, you're out!