Amos Otis
Well-Known Member
None if this is directed at you @Amos Otis, I just used your comment to reply to.
None if this is directed at you @Amos Otis, I just used your comment to reply to.
Hahahaha!
Just because someone's account is new, doesn't mean they have no experience and definitely doesn't mean they dont know what they're talking about. That enough pics for ya?I only partially stereotyped
To be honest you're right. It's my frustration talking. Something about accounts that are a few months old without a single grow or even picture shared trying to say anything to members who share and actually have tangible experiences with the breeder.
Until you share and contribute something I can see, nothing you say will hold any weight with me, and I will speak up when those people start talking down to other contributing members who are speaking of real, relevant experiences.
That is the only reason I said anything at all.
The deputy, 58 days under 12/12 from seed, pulled with about 80% cloudy 10% clear 10% amber. prolly could have went to day 63 max. Mediocre (at best) grower. Pics under the lights are all about a week before chop or so.someone please post a pic of GPS strain that doesnt look like stardawg... and flowers in less than 74 days please...
i would say thats better than mediocregrowing attempt. nicely done. one of the finest gps examples ive seen.The deputy, 58 days under 12/12 from seed, pulled with about 80% cloudy 10% clear 10% amber. prolly could have went to day 63 max. Mediocre (at best) grower. Pics under the lights are all about a week before chop or so.View attachment 4256750 View attachment 4256751 View attachment 4256752
Edit, not grown 12/12 from seed. 12/12 after flip. Some people count flower days different so I thought I would clarify.
Not to say I haven’t seen stardawg learners but one thing I can say is there was so many releases of stardawg that there are many ways it can end up looking not to mention a shit load of crossses and ogs and chem plants that also all come out looking alike ( not to say some plants don’t have a distinct look or structure) but com’on a shit ton of strains look alikeand cmon genuity, youve been around the block.
Those threads would get lost in the fray dude. Start a random thread and see how many pages it is buried back in just a few days.You know, there IS another way to handle that concern (uninformed S1 customers.) You could just start a new thread with an obvious title that would attract any customers with those seeds and spell it out there. Something like "Greenpoint Seeds S1 elite ripoff" or something like that. Nail it in 1 post right up front, and then all the people selflessly putting in daily effort to keep the froth of hatred whipped to a high peak could take a day off.
Hell, even better . . . create a general thread called "Problems with Greenpoint Seeds" and unload ALL of the issues you and others that share your concerns seem so fixated on.
Anyone scrolling the forum or searching for info on Greenpoint would hit the thread immediately, and not have to risk missing your message because of the inconvenient volume of satisfied, successful Greenpoint customers diluting this thread with happy grow and smoke reports.
Just saying, you fellows are going about this all wrong. Very inefficient way to get your messages out.
The deputy, 58 days under 12/12 from seed, pulled with about 80% cloudy 10% clear 10% amber. prolly could have went to day 63 max. Mediocre (at best) grower. Pics under the lights are all about a week before chop or so.View attachment 4256750 View attachment 4256751 View attachment 4256752
Edit, not grown 12/12 from seed. 12/12 after flip. Some people count flower days different so I thought I would clarify.
Green Dots female of these stardawg seeds looks exactly like Badmofo's 1st pic..Hold on I will finditWhat's stardawg look like?
That's the pics we need to see.