churchhaze
Well-Known Member
Excuse me, but if you have a veg area, you NEED to put a lamp over the plants. It's not an accessory. Your analogy is bad and you know it. Both a veg lamp and a flowering lamp use energy. People don't have a veg area for decoration as you suggest... It's part of producing buds or nobody would have a veg area.No mate, @CobKits is stating the obvious: vegged plants don't produce buds. Buds are what pay the rent (and power bill).
Your suggestion to spend more money on veg lights than flowering lights is a bit like telling a drag racer to spend more money on paint instead of sticky tyres or engine mods.
Plants flower, on average, for eight weeks - plenty of time to take clones and veg for the next round.
Most flowering chambers - as already pointed out - consume far more power than veg chambers.
24 hours in veg is not the most efficient use of light, either - look it up.
Note: no-one is disagreeing with you that LEDs are a better alternative to CFLs, but the best bang for buck is always going to be in improvements in flowering, not veg.
Bottom line is that you get double the value out of a veg lamp just because it runs for twice as long. What's there not to get about this? It's clearly the low hanging fruit, not the flowering lamp.
There's no point of upgrading your flowering lamp if you still have a shitty veg lamp. It just shows that savings isn't your goal, being cool and using LEDs is.
Last edited: