I just rewatched fury v wilder. Did anyone think wilder v fury was a draw? Aside from Deontae showing he can eat jabs like they're gummy bears we got to see what happens when he fights a bigger far more skilled opponent. Not sure how the commission can justify the scoring as it wasn't even remotely close but I'm not surprised.
During and immediately after the fight, no. I thought Fury clearly won on the boxing cards even with the knockdowns.
Ignoring the rules of scoring a boxing bout neither guy won. Both walked out of there conscious.
Without scorecards we could say Wilder got some of the better shots with greater power and scored the knockdowns. From 'who got beat up' we might say that Fury got more beat up overall. He almost got ktfo. He might have been flashed out and came back?
I've recently come to a conclusion within myself that I wish they would do away with ALL judging across the board.
Someone wins or it's a draw. If nobody wins, why declare a winner, stupidest shit ever, and it's been this way for ever and we just accept it. Too many poor decisions or outright robberies or draws that should have been where a winner was named.
Ditch the judges, KO or draw.
. I'd be interested to see who has to dance with the back flipping 6'5er down the road.....very scary prospect
