is this the middle ages?

[Rob Roy]

Back to that imaginary, non existent black business owner?

Years of building your argument and the best you have is an imaginary black guy

So, if you are correct that there are NO, NONE, ZERO black people who would oppose being forced to serve another person against their will, are you saying their actions are based in voluntary interactions wherein they could decide to opt in or opt out of ?

Still winning.

 

[londonfog]

See, that's just it. If I wouldn't discriminate based on race, what you're really asking me is what the possibilities of other people who are racists would do. It's their property right?

Racism is silly.

Explain what you would to do a black person who refused to associate with a person he preferred not to. Okay, you won't touch that. So I'll explain it for you, you'd ask government to force him to serve another person against his will.

I'm asking you how you would control rasim in your utopia. Pay attention.

How do you stop someone from entering a establishment, which is open to the public, that the racist owner did not want in

 

[londonfog]

So, if you are correct that there are NO, NONE, ZERO black people who would oppose being forced to serve another person against their will, are you saying their actions are based in voluntary interactions wherein they could decide to opt in or opt out of ?

Still winning.

If you are getting paid to do something, you are being forced ? Before a person is HIRED he must agree to do what he is being hired to do.
Stop being stupid.

 

[Rob Roy]

I'm asking you how you would control rasim in your utopia. Pay attention.

How do you stop someone from entering a establishment, which is open to the public, that the racist owner did not want in

What you're asking is a common error amongst people like you who have been taught to believe in two opposing things at once and to defer to government word smithing as the default correct word usage. It's been very effective controlling the masses.

If the property is owned by somebody, (a person(s) ) it isn't "public property" ,so making the leap to calling that property "open to the public" against the wishes of the owner(s) insists that you are thinking two opposing concepts can exist in the same circumstances and it doesn't matter. That's an unsound belief. It's faith based and fawning to your masters.

First define what property is. Then ask yourself if something is property, who is the person who should control it ?

If property is owned it CAN'T by definition be open to the public if that goes against the owners wishes and still be "owned" by the ostensible owner. It must mean SOMEBODY else owns the property.

 

[Rob Roy]

If you are getting paid to do something, you are being forced ? Before a person is HIRED he must agree to do what he is being hired to do.
Stop being stupid.

Not quite slowpoke.

If I agreed with you to do X for a specified amount of value in trade and you did too, your argument would be valid. It would then be a mutual and consensual human interaction between us, nobody was forced into it.

Can you show me where the nonexistent "agreement" exists when a person refuses to do business with another person? No, you can't.

 

[Rob Roy]

I'm asking you how you would control rasim in your utopia. Pay attention.

How do you stop someone from entering a establishment, which is open to the public, that the racist owner did not want in

I can't "control" racism in other peoples minds, nobody can. I can only ostracize racists business owners and let them suffer the consequences of their actions.

I CAN try to persuade people to use their property as I'd like them to, but I have no right to force anybody to serve another person. Neither do you.

 

[UncleBuck]

If you could put down the bath salts for a minute foreskin biter. I'm not advocating for other people to do anything with their OWN property, like you are.

I believe every person of every race has the equal right of self determination, whereas you would force a black guy (or a white guy etc.) to associate with people he preferred not to.

I'm opposed to the use of initiatory force and think defensive force is a moral option, but prefer people to work things out by sometimes just leaving others alone who want to be left alone. It's not my job to micro manage other people.

You believe in racial segregation signs

 

[schuylaar]

Yes you can. Just tell them you live in Canada.

Welcome to the land where a new 'slapping law' means beating your partner is no longer a criminal offense.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/0dd0ab91-145a-4137-bf87-28d0498c8d56

If your Boyfriend/Girlfriend is beating you, get him to bring down here for a beating, we'll protect you and prosecute him.

It's ok to come out of the shadows.

that's russia the way your post is worded, i thought you meant this is a new canadian law.

 

[schuylaar]

I can't "control" racism in other peoples minds, nobody can. I can only ostracize racists business owners and let them suffer the consequences of their actions.

I CAN try to persuade people to use their property as I'd like them to, but I have no right to force anybody to serve another person. Neither do you.

please try to pursuade @UncleBuck of something, anything..

 

[schuylaar]

Why is there always a "mule" in any homesteading talk ? Lol.

On the topic of homesteading, just think if the real owners (government and their handlers) of so called public land "allowed" people to homestead it, how that might incentivize people to leave decaying urban areas and have a more sustainable life style.

EDIT: because when your a kid learning history the mule sounds cool..

that's because you trusted the republican white man..you knew you shouldn't have.

 

[schuylaar]

I'm drinking 100 proof bourbon out of a 100 year-old cup made outta cow horn

mmmmmmmmmmmmm, bourbon..the sweeter the better..my favorite hard 'standalone'.

 

[Rob Roy]

You believe in racial segregation signs

You believe in equal oppression of individuals and confuse that with something you wish was equal rights, but isn't. Your belief is a logical impossibility which is demonstrably provable.

If people are going to be equal (and we should be) we should begin our relationships on a mutual and voluntary basis. If they don't begin that way, and person X forces another peaceful or neutral person into a relationship against their will, initiatory force has been added to the relationship, which by definition, negates "equality" .

You believe in soiling clean floors.


Still winning (yawn) .

 

[Rob Roy]

that's because you trusted the republican white man..you knew you shouldn't have.

Complying with something under duress isn't the same as agreeing with it. It is a morally justifiable survival tactic.

Also, you can trust a dishonest person to be dishonest, which is sort of like trusting in your trust that they're dishonest. Say that 3 times fast win a "free" 40 acres and a mule.

 

[schuylaar]

In between your fascinating penis stories, you should research the female Hyena reproductive story. It's sort of an animal world anomaly.

The clitoris of the female spotted hyena is a tube-like pseudo penis 6 to 7 inches long that looks almost identical to a male penis. Completing the illusion, the labia are fused together in what appears to be a scrotum.

Giving birth is difficult for female hyenas, as the females give birth through their narrow clitoris, and spotted hyena cubs are the largest carnivoran young relative to their mothers' weight. ... This neonatal siblicide kills an estimated 25% of all hyenasin their first month.

they give birth through the clitoris:

+rep totally learned something new today..thanks, big guy!

 

[Rob Roy]

please try to pursuade @UncleBuck of something, anything..

I think he may be a semi-competent gardener and kind to his cat.

 

[Rob Roy]

The clitoris of the female spotted hyena is a tube-like pseudo penis 6 to 7 inches long that looks almost identical to a male penis. Completing the illusion, the labia are fused together in what appears to be a scrotum.

Birthing is a dangerous experience for the female. Evolution or the results of it, is fascinating.

Given their visual sexual ambiguity, I wonder which bathroom Hyena's use ? hmm...probably need a sign on the door?

 

[UncleBuck]

You believe in equal oppression of individuals and confuse that with something you wish was equal rights, but isn't. Your belief is a logical impossibility which is demonstrably provable.

If people are going to be equal (and we should be) we should begin our relationships on a mutual and voluntary basis. If they don't begin that way, and person X forces another peaceful or neutral person into a relationship against their will, initiatory force has been added to the relationship, which by definition, negates "equality" .

You believe in soiling clean floors.


Still winning (yawn) .

Hey everyone

The racial segregation signs guy wants us to believe he is very interested in equality

We all believe you, pedophile

 

[UncleBuck]

Birthing is a dangerous experience for the female. Evolution or the results of it, is fascinating.

Given their visual sexual ambiguity, I wonder which bathroom Hyena's use ? hmm...probably need a sign on the door?

Shut the fuck up you creepy white pedophile

 

[schuylaar]

Complying with something under duress isn't the same as agreeing with it. It is a morally justifiable survival tactic.

Also, you can trust a dishonest person to be dishonest, which is sort of like trusting in your trust that they're dishonest. Say that 3 times fast win a "free" 40 acres and a mule.

your long white beard looks cool..i really couldn't see the pic well..what was the costume? it was sewn well but again far away so i couldn't really see.

what is your native language and are you stlll fluent?

 

[schuylaar]

Shut the fuck up you creepy white pedophile

he's pacific islander so not white, Bucky.