not true, infact all hydroponics systems would be in the same fate it was.
plus any hydroponics system has a high learning curve, so that's crap too.
I'm not a stranger to the likes of grafting so I understand the errors or danger with such practices.
This is a great idea, I am not disputing that, but you to easily brush aside things like added moisture in the area within a small enclosed environment. Where people with a dialled climate control could negate this, those with ought ''might'' struggle allot and end up losing weeks worth of veg time or worse.
It isn't ''crap'' to see the potential negatives of this simply because ''hydro has a high learning curve too''. In fact, the more tricky your individual practices are, the more risk something will go wrong. Once again I am not shitting on this idea, but it should be done with extreme caution in an already dialled in set-up. I'm just trying to warn newbies is all, this isn't something to take lightly.
I always thought air layering has potential with growing cannabis. The fact that you can have one large mother plant, or many, with a bunch of branches air layering taller clones is interesting. It would be beneficial to those who have plant count limits and want to abide by them, effective air layering could speed up the turn around time between crops. The day the flowering clones are harvested the air layers could be removed and take their place. You could have a bunch of 1'+ tall clones that only need a week or two of veg (possibly less) before they go into the flowering phase. I have never successfully completed an air layer clone, but I have only tried it three times over the years.
That may be a very good thing for scrog growers, for anybody with low pot count they would need a lot more true veg time.