Kingrow1
Well-Known Member
Any light can make great bud, stop hating on lights just because your wound up in the whole led craze....Really? Ive seen viper buds and they are OK but I would not of called them great.
Any light can make great bud, stop hating on lights just because your wound up in the whole led craze....Really? Ive seen viper buds and they are OK but I would not of called them great.
vipars are blurple led lights. They will grow but you can have better results with a lot of other lights. LED or otherwise. And they all throw heat. Pretty much right on their wattage. But you can run a 315 in an air cooled hood and the heat goes away out your tent.Any light can make great bud, stop hating on lights just because your wound up in the whole led craze....
What?Any light can make great bud, stop hating on lights just because your wound up in the whole led craze....
The bossy person assumes that "you are wound up in the whole led craze" because you are using 600w MH/HPS in your grow journal?What?
Some guy back in the 1800's or so was out hunting in Siberia. He was digging fishing holes over a river when he noticed what looked like a bear deep below the ice. He returned some months later when the ice began to melt and soon realized what he actually found was a woolly mammoth. He harvested the tusks and sold them to the ivory trade.What?
The response from lucky suggested vips. dont grow great bud but ok bud. I take this to be a firm stab at quality nit quantity and would remind you that here on this site GREAT bud has been grown under most nearly all lights including vips.vipars are blurple led lights. They will grow but you can have better results with a lot of other lights. LED or otherwise. And they all throw heat. Pretty much right on their wattage. But you can run a 315 in an air cooled hood and the heat goes away out your tent.
Really? Ive seen viper buds and they are OK but I would not of called them great.
Yes & nowould 4 of the single COB lights spread enough light around for a 4 foot by 4 foot tent? That was my next experiment/plan
Hah that's kinda funny. All the things I argue with you are over things you've said.Those that hate me are generally the ones getting into arguments on grow info all over the site and have tet to learn anything past the mundane and boring, case in point is the discussion on wind..... fucking weak
Plants exisiting under water is related to the fact that they can live in over 100% humidity environments and that relates directly to wind and my comments on boundary layer where it is not necessary for wind to be added for this principle to work and cool a leaf.Hah that's kinda funny. All the things I argue with you are over things you've said.
Wind does not exist under water and plants survive there.. so wind isn't needed was one of your arguments. Currents, tides and thermal vents exist under water and take on the role of wind. Around such areas holds the highest concentration of life, for obvious reasons. When I hinted at that you ran away and blamed everybody else for being ''mundane and boring''. How about you man up and start answering counter arguments to statements you make?.. rather than misleading newbies with your bs theory's and big words.. then playing the victim when you get called out.
Just for educational purpose. Actual wind also helps the oceans plants as it blows minerals into the sea. You should watch a documentary every now and then.
Just being able to tolerate 100% humidity isn't enough. Plants are immobile so something is needed to give them the nutrients they require.. be it other life or minerals washed in or blew in via currents/winds. A mechanic to replenish nutrients to the area is required.. no ifs or buts. That's why your comparison of under water life to indoor plants is flawed, irreversibly. Even to compare it to land based plants is flawed.Plants exisiting under water is related to the fact that they can live in over 100% humidity environments and that relates directly to wind and my comments on boundary layer where it is not necessary for wind to be added for this principle to work and cool a leaf.
You refuse to argue with me because I don't have the capacity?. Now you've got your running shoes on, lucky I have a bike .i didnt run away, here for long time now brosef, i simply saw you werent ready to discuss higher shit like what you run round here thinking you do, in other words you knowledge is of a lower level so there was never going to be any discussion past your own comprehension.
What is it, I lack comprehension or I am a troll, or both?. You have a lot of excuses. Stating that wind and currents helps bring nutrients to the ocean is ''broscience'' ;p.You should see i am not one for being trolled off, come at me bro and the newer growers might just google some science and get bored of your broscience.
Again wind has tollerances that dictate the cooling system the leaf uses, this is dictated under energy budgets and divided into free cooling and forced at wind speeds.
I've mentioned ppfd maybe 3 times, all 3 times to tell you that I've never mentioned ppfd. So you're either a troll or you've proved my point that you talk absolute shit.Fucking weak bro, challenge away its just you cant understand anything past your own little industry bubble led world of ppfd and all that crap i reguarly prove you wrong on.
If anything that is the other way around.. so I'll continue to call out your bs so newbs don't get confused. 5 people that I know of are blocking you, maybe they also lack comprehension?.One day youll see the site not your own greatness, untill then your simply trolls not peeps who can discuss and break open some science over a fatty.....
Been said before, i can say it again