canadian1969
Well-Known Member
Hey man, you did correct me on that, it is more linear in a tent, I took my own measures and I thanked you for that clarification.Doesn't say anything contradicting my claims.
The fact that they list all those methods as an option for improving yield basically confirms my claims. They all work.
Besides if one method would actually yield a lot more then the others, they would have said so. They don't. So ... ehm ... what does that say? Or why bother even listing all the others?
Trouble is that not doing anything works too. They left that out, but in most cases the plants will adjust themselves to maximum yields too.
Just this little pearl of bullshit though:
I guess the problem is that you simply don't grasp the whole concept. Unfortunately I doubt you ever will. Head too far in the sand.
There are a lot of myths too though. People think a lot of things will yield them massively more than they did so far. Just like you that you think you can simply double your yield with a simple trick.
There is much more to it why some people get better yields than others.
Point is, it's not in the duration of veg. Well apart from timing the switch to 12/12 right I guess.
Training definitely makes a difference, many ways to do it with varying results, all impacting yield. Even if you do not veg for any longer. Your premise of do nothing to the plant in veg, flip it when you are ready and anything others did during veg makes no difference is absolutely false.
Again and again and again, I am trying to find a metric that fairly compares grows, I have established mathematically that it cannot be done without taking time and energy use into account.