Highest THC strain out there
- Thread starter Smithy1
- Start date
Lordhooha
Well-Known Member
Depends on grower and environment to pull those levels from said genetics. Looking for the highest yielding or highest thc content wont mean crap if your room/tent Isn’t in order.
hotrodharley
Well-Known Member
Strawberry Banana is supposedly it. For now. Impossible to know really .
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
https://www.leafly.com/news/strains-products/the-strongest-cannabis-strain-according-to-lab-data
Can’t vouch for leafly or lab data but here it is. At least from just under a year ago.
Ghost OG averages 28% thc in testing and the article mentions that a variety of canabanoids and terpenes should also be considered in the effects. But only thc is compared.
Which makes the strongest strain very subjective.
Can’t vouch for leafly or lab data but here it is. At least from just under a year ago.
Ghost OG averages 28% thc in testing and the article mentions that a variety of canabanoids and terpenes should also be considered in the effects. But only thc is compared.
Which makes the strongest strain very subjective.
Jefferson1977
Well-Known Member
I have Ethos Genetics "Inzane in the Membrane" which posits itself around 30-35% THC. I am growing it next round, getting the moms started now. The plant is supposed to be very tall indicating its' sativa influence I suppose.
Big Perm
Well-Known Member
Interesting. I just got a Strawberry Banana Grape. It's a Strawberry x Grape x Banana OG. Never grown it before.
Poontanger
Well-Known Member
Lordhooha……...is on the money , its bit like asking what strain is the highest yielder !!
How good are U at growing ??
Genetics wont carry U , but I understand there must be a starting point
& im sure if U obtain powerfull thc your yield will suffer
How good are U at growing ??
Genetics wont carry U , but I understand there must be a starting point
& im sure if U obtain powerfull thc your yield will suffer
xtsho
Well-Known Member
Those THC levels breeders list should be taken with a grain of salt just like the flowering times they list. Could be more or less depending on the grower and environment just as @Lordhooha already stated.
tyke1973
Well-Known Member
No one really Knows, a lot of strains get grown that do not get tested.The strongest smoke i have ever had was Arjons Ultra Haze # 1 years ago.Have a strain that on Paper says 32 % grown wrong could be 12% ,one at 12 % grown in perfect conditions could do a lot higher than 12 .A lot a factors to take into account
Beachwalker
Well-Known Member
I would bet you never smoked weed in the 60's, 70s or 80s. THC doesn't mean as much as you may think Jimmy, good luck![/QUOTE]
BigHornBuds
Well-Known Member
No matter what others are getting , you’ll need to pop lots of beans n pheno hunt and test each plant .
tyke1973
Well-Known Member
No I think everything has a Limit .
Lordhooha
Well-Known Member
[/QUOTE]
Very true I grew up in the 90’s however I’ve seen a deal where they grew out old seeds from strains from the 70’s and tested them and ended up fairly close to today’s crosses.
Lordhooha
Well-Known Member
Very true.
Big Perm
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
ganga gurl420
Well-Known Member
Kings banner by dark horse genetics can be up to 30%. If I can get my hands on the seeds here in a month or so it's going in my garden next grow.
xtsho
Well-Known Member
[/QUOTE]
The Thai, Hawaiian, Columbian Gold, Jamaican, etc... from the 70's and 80's was some great stuff. Then there was that wonderful hashish. In fact I've been growing nothing but landrace strains. I much prefer Some Acapulco Gold over these new designer crosses with some name that sounds like a spaceship or some alien invader out of Star Trek.
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
Pretty sure the strongest I ever smoked was the skunk weed in the 80’s.
It was also the stinkiest.
I have read thc content was around 8-12%. But I don’t know how it was tested back then and we really have no standards today.
It was also the stinkiest.
I have read thc content was around 8-12%. But I don’t know how it was tested back then and we really have no standards today.