Dismal intercourse

How dismal?


  • Total voters
    11

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
Lefty idiots. Obvious Dvesha. You’re really getting in your own way with this. You very clearly don’t understand what Buddhism, Hinduism, or Vedic & Sramanic thought is even about.
There's a difference between lefty idiots and rational good hearted lefties. I"ve only met two on here, Skyler and Tim1987.

I consider what I do as Upaya.

Why is it so hard to get through to your thick skulll I'll give you a honest do goody response if you ask nicely? But I won't if you're confrontational and try some lefty mind games trying to convince me of something I'm already not.
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
huh

You must have been replying to somebody else. I'll just ask again. Why is it that you White supremacists get so angry that they just drive into a crowd of people?
The Buddha loves you even if your mind is clouded by all three poisons. If not this life, you'll gain enlightenment eventually. For all intelligent beings who have heard the word of Amitabha, which you have from me, means you at least did something good in a past life to hear the message. Even if you don't believe now.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
There's a difference between lefty idiots and rational good hearted lefties. I"ve only met two on here, Skyler and Tim1987.

I consider what I do as Upaya.

Why is it so hard to get through to your thick skulll I'll give you a honest do goody response if you ask nicely? But I won't if you're confrontational and try some lefty mind games trying to convince me of something I'm already not.
That’s where you’re wrong. Buddhists teach there is no division at all. You are not adhering to Dharma. You confuse your ego for your soul. Very unfortunate.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
The Buddha loves you even if your mind is clouded by all three poisons. If not this life, you'll gain enlightenment eventually. For all intelligent beings who have heard the word of Amitabha, which you have from me, means you at least did something good in a past life to hear the message. Even if you don't believe now.
“Buddha” isn’t a separate entity. There is a Buddha in each of us, and he/she will not awaken in them in the presence of a clouded mind. Satori/Nirvana/Moksha/Samadhi cannot be experienced in this way. It directly prevents it.

There is no “eventually,” only the eternal Now.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
@Buddha2525

I understand the historical figure of Siddartha Gautama. His ego/persona was not the important part. What Gautama Buddha represented and what he taught the world was where the importance lies. His soul is what was important, and his soul is your soul is my soul is the world’s soul.

Rather, his lack of soul. It was all just one thing. No separate or individual souls to discourse over, just this.

 

srh88

Well-Known Member
How many people have raped you today or ever over cultural Marxism? Funny how you mock me when you claim something that isn't a conspiracy theory is one. You're like Milo Stewart who's a woman pretending to be a man pretending to be a woman. But she's actually funny, you're not.

How many people have raped you today or ever over cultural Marxism? Funny how you mock me when you claim something that isn't a conspiracy theory is one. You're like Milo Stewart who's a woman pretending to be a man pretending to be a woman. But she's actually funny, you're not.

Is it tough tried to convince people you're budhist online? PS: you're holier than though bullshit gave ya up
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
“Buddha” isn’t a separate entity. There is a Buddha in each of us, and he/she will not awaken in them in the presence of a clouded mind. Satori/Nirvana/Moksha/Samadhi cannot be experienced in this way. It directly prevents it.

There is no “eventually,” only the eternal Now.
Buddha and Amitabha are interchangeable in Pure Land thought.

We currently live in the degenerate mòfǎ age. Our only hope is keeping the white path of saying Namo Amituofo between the fire (hatred) and water (greed), and not listening to the brigands( gang of robbers, our senses). When we mistake that the self can free us and not calling out the nianfo, we're doomed to continually live in samsara.

Sometimes we lose control over our emotions because of karmic retribution from past lives, at which point we must not forget to call out the Buddha's name as the only way to assured way for rebirth in the land of bliss. But if we instead rely on ourself we risk losing faith and the only means of salvation.

Namo Amituofo.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
I like Alan Watts especially his essay on Buddhism as Hinduism export.

https://www.organism.earth/library/document/26
I would use the word “reform” or “commentary.” All Buddhist and Hindu and Jain sects stem from Sramana and Vedic thought. They’re all just amalgamations of the same two root philosophies. These later led to the creation of Zoroastrianism, Greek & Roman Paganism, the Celtic Druids, etc. At their root, they really do mean the same thing, they were just bastardized over time.
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
@Buddha2525

I understand the historical figure of Siddartha Gautama. His ego/persona was not the important part. What Gautama Buddha represented and what he taught the world was where the importance lies. His soul is what was important, and his soul is your soul is my soul is the world’s soul.

Rather, his lack of soul. It was all just one thing. No separate or individual souls to discourse over, just this.

I don't believe that, I'm not an part of an ant colony, or a Borg hive mind with God. We're separate from Brahma. He needs us just as much or more, than we do. Without us he's incomplete and he too is stuck in samsara. It has to do with lonliness. Even Brahma alone would go nuts.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Buddha and Amitabha are interchangeable in Pure Land thought.

We currently live in the degenerate mòfǎ age. Our only hope is keeping the white path of saying Namo Amituofo between the fire (hatred) and water (greed), and not listening to the brigands( gang of robbers, our senses). When we mistake that the self can free us and not calling out the nianfo, we're doomed to continually live in samsara.

Sometimes we lose control over our emotions because of karmic retribution from past lives, at which point we must not forget to call out the Buddha's name as the only way to assured way for rebirth in the land of bliss. But if we instead rely on ourself we risk losing faith and the only means of salvation.

Namo Amituofo.
"I feel like being religious. Let's make bullshit work for me"
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
I don't believe that, I'm not an part of an ant colony, or a Borg hive mind with God. We're separate from Brahma. He needs us just as much or more, than we do. Without us he's incomplete and he too is stuck in samsara. It has to do with lonliness. Even Brahma alone would go nuts.
Then you aren’t a Buddhist. You’re clearly very confused. Buddhism states there in no “us.” We as separate entities do not exist. Only the Maya/Illusion of the ego makes it appear so.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
@Buddha2525

“Anatta is a central doctrine of Buddhism, and marks one of the major differences between Buddhism and Hinduism. Buddhists do not believe that at the core of all human beings and living creatures, there is any "eternal, essential and absolute something called a soul, self or atman".
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Naw, he's no Buddhist. He's just some alt.right asshole or who is lampooning and insulting Buddhist religious philosophy. He's pretty much just scum.

Olive Drab is cleaning his clock. Kind of funny watching budd squirm.
I called him out a couple days ago... He asked me if he wasn't a budhist why does he go to budhist church.. I LOLd but replied
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
I would use the word “reform” or “commentary.” All Buddhist and Hindu and Jain sects stem from Sramana and Vedic thought. They’re all just amalgamations of the same two root philosophies. These later led to the creation of Zoroastrianism, Greek & Roman Paganism, the Celtic Druids, etc. At their root, they really do mean the same thing, they were just bastardized over time.
Zoroastrianism and hindu thought come from an even older unknown root religion which then split. The rishis and Brahmins had a fight over whether you go to one of four heavens, the four pure lands in Buddhism, or moshka(similar to nirvana) is the goal.

Which is why in vedic texts devas are good, but in the avesta asura are good, hence asura mazda is the main god, compared to vedic Lord Agni, both fire gods.

In the end most all religions are corruptions of the true old proto-indo-european religion.
 
Top