UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Forgive, I thought I had already explained. I did not understand it was a farcical argument, I thought it was a first amendment issue resolved by the SC in recent masterpiece bakery decision. You set me straight. Hope that answers your question.
you don't think it resembles a farce, especially because of the absurd and ridiculous aspects, to argue that your religious liberty is being violated if you open a store and people who are gay or black go to your store for goods and services?