Assange the rapist headed to face the music

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
How do we know that without seeing all his internal campaign emails?

He needs to release them to me. I will then go through them and release them all as I see fit. You will not be able to verify whether I altered them or not

Deal?
Hillary Clinton admitted she expresses different opinions, specifically about Wall Street reform depending on the crowd she's speaking to;

Hillary Clinton told top banking executives that she has “both a public and a private position” on Wall Street reform and is reliant on wealthy donors to fund her campaign, leaked excerpts of the former first lady’s speeches seem to show, fueling claims of hypocrisy on the part of Mrs. Clinton at a crucial moment in the presidential campaign.

The release by WikiLeaks, which the Clinton campaign has said it will not confirm, appears to show Mrs. Clinton discussing how she seeks to “balance” her public rhetoric on Wall Street reform with her actual positions, and with the reality that wealthy bankers and investors must partner with government to enact change. The documents also show the former secretary of state admitting that she’s out of touch with average Americans and is “kind of far removed” from the lives of the middle class.

She also claims it’s an “oversimplification” to say that the banking sector was responsible for the 2008 financial meltdown.

The bombshell revelations, which came less than 48 hours before Mrs. Clinton’s next debate against Republican Donald Trump, led top progressives to publicly call on Mrs. Clinton to redouble her vows to crack down on Wall Street. Leading liberals, including Sen. Bernard Sanders, long have called on Mrs. Clinton to release transcripts of the speeches, which she delivered after her four years as secretary of state.

The WikiLeaks dump doesn’t include full transcripts of the speeches to firms such as Goldman Sachs, but it does provide a window into the chasm between Mrs. Clinton’s public promises and private words. The excerpts seem to have been obtained through a hack of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s email.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Hillary Clinton admitted she expresses different opinions, specifically about Wall Street reform depending on the crowd she's speaking to;

Hillary Clinton told top banking executives that she has “both a public and a private position” on Wall Street reform and is reliant on wealthy donors to fund her campaign, leaked excerpts of the former first lady’s speeches seem to show, fueling claims of hypocrisy on the part of Mrs. Clinton at a crucial moment in the presidential campaign.

The release by WikiLeaks, which the Clinton campaign has said it will not confirm, appears to show Mrs. Clinton discussing how she seeks to “balance” her public rhetoric on Wall Street reform with her actual positions, and with the reality that wealthy bankers and investors must partner with government to enact change. The documents also show the former secretary of state admitting that she’s out of touch with average Americans and is “kind of far removed” from the lives of the middle class.

She also claims it’s an “oversimplification” to say that the banking sector was responsible for the 2008 financial meltdown.

The bombshell revelations, which came less than 48 hours before Mrs. Clinton’s next debate against Republican Donald Trump, led top progressives to publicly call on Mrs. Clinton to redouble her vows to crack down on Wall Street. Leading liberals, including Sen. Bernard Sanders, long have called on Mrs. Clinton to release transcripts of the speeches, which she delivered after her four years as secretary of state.

The WikiLeaks dump doesn’t include full transcripts of the speeches to firms such as Goldman Sachs, but it does provide a window into the chasm between Mrs. Clinton’s public promises and private words. The excerpts seem to have been obtained through a hack of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s email.
So how do we know Bernie doesn’t unless he releases his internal campaign emails?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
It's telling you're more upset you got caught cheating than you are your team cheated. You're more upset someone looking into it behind the scenes saw exactly what you were doing, exposed it, and everyone who saw it condemned you for it, and yet you still deny it ever even happened. Even though you claim the results of the election are at least partially attributed to Russia. Amazing..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's telling you're more upset you got caught cheating than you are your team cheated. You're more upset someone looking into it behind the scenes saw exactly what you were doing, exposed it, and everyone who saw it condemned you for it, and yet you still deny it ever even happened. Even though you claim the results of the election are at least partially attributed to Russia. Amazing..
No one cheated except for when Bernie’s team stole some of Clinton’s campaign data
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
How’s your wife?

Maybe I should invite myself over to give her some affection

Poor beaten down by the noob buck. What a lowlife thing to say.

All I ever said was I would have more in common with your Jewish family than you do. And it was in jest.

You are awful at this game you think you are in charge of.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You're making contradictory claims; A. the information obtained by the DNC leaks was inconsequential, B. the leaks helped contribute to Hillary Clinton's loss to Trump

So which is it?
The propaganda program was effective. They didn't need to prove anything, they just needed to change minds.

Regarding the contradiction that those emails (if true) showed bias but it doesn't mean they rigged the election like you shits claim. I don't like you shits either but it wouldn't affect my professional treatment of you.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The propaganda program was effective. They didn't need to prove anything, they just needed to change minds.

Regarding the contradiction that those emails (if true) showed bias but it doesn't mean they rigged the election like you shits claim. I don't like you shits either but it wouldn't affect my professional treatment of you.
What would rigging an election look like to you?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
What would rigging an election look like to you?
Somebody showing evidence that there was. Real evidence. Such as what Mueller seems to be putting together on what happened in 2016 regarding Trump's campaign and Russian hacking. If he finds no collusion, I'll accept it.

Brazille said there is no evidence others with much more legal cred than you went over the record too and said "there is no evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign took unfair advantage". Get over it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Poor beaten down by the noob buck. What a lowlife thing to say.

All I ever said was I would have more in common with your Jewish family than you do. And it was in jest.

You are awful at this game you think you are in charge of.
You said you were gonna invite yourself over to my house with my infant child after a nazi emailed you a map, dumbass
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
You said you were gonna invite yourself over to my house with my infant child after a nazi emailed you a map, dumbass

What I said was (of course you edited the quote and only repeat your version) that I should invite myself over I have more in common with your family than you do.

The fact you can’t quote me the way you say things were is the funniest part of you continuing to talk here.

Why anyone that can read would follow or even agree with you is baffling.
 
Top