Assange the rapist headed to face the music

ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Man, you need some mental help.

Hillary's emails didn't make one god damned bit of difference in the peoples election: SHE STILL WON IT YOU DUMB FUCK. By 3,000,000 votes!!!

You're the only one that thinks Assange is worth anything at all. Nobody else on earth does. What, are you fucking him or something? You have posters of him to masturbate to in your bathroom? I mean, what is your strange man-love of this guy that's got you to the point of spewing not just complete bullshit and falsehoods, but denying even stone cold FACT.

I'm serious, man. You need to check yourself into the nearest mental institution for an evaluation. You're completely and totally fucked in the head.
Click to expand...
If he's so fucked in the head, why isn't Hillary in the White House?

Maybe you need to do some more homework.
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
If he's so fucked in the head, why isn't Hillary in the White House?
Click to expand...
You're probably the same person as you're both equally fucked in the head.

Nothing that was put on Wikileaks had anything at all to do with the outcome of the election. It didn't influence people's votes enough to do that.

We've had the electorate override the popular vote several times in the past. The last time was when G.W. Bush beat Al Gore when Wikileaks didn't even exist.

All you guys do is make bullshit up that Assange puts out himself to make himself look like he's a player in the game. He isn't. He's worthless. Nobody gives a shit about him. At all. Full stop.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
You're probably the same person as you're both equally fucked in the head.

Nothing that was put on Wikileaks had anything at all to do with the outcome of the election. It didn't influence people's votes enough to do that.

We've had the electorate override the popular vote several times in the past. The last time was when G.W. Bush beat Al Gore when Wikileaks didn't even exist.

All you guys do is make bullshit up that Assange puts out himself to make himself look like he's a player in the game. He isn't. He's worthless. Nobody gives a shit about him. At all. Full stop.
Click to expand...
Berners give a shit because they have been told what to think by their unseemly propaganda machine.

I scanned some of the crap in that package and read the sections that the Progressives(TM) were apoplectic about. There was bias shown towards Clinton in their rhetoric is about all I could see that was going on. Otherwise, agree with you. It was just back office crap. Not much there. The "conspiracies" claimed to be shown in those e-mails by Berners is bunk.

As is common among them, they get their beliefs from talking heads on the internet and don't do original anything including thought. All they know of the Wikileaks DNC data are a few lines of text extracted from the leaks given to them with a thought guide for how to interpret it.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Berners give a shit because they have been told what to think by their unseemly propaganda machine.

I scanned some of the crap in that package and read the sections that the Progressives(TM) were apoplectic about. There was bias shown towards Clinton in their rhetoric is about all I could see that was going on. Otherwise, agree with you. It was just back office crap. Not much there. The "conspiracies" claimed to be shown in those e-mails by Berners is bunk.

As is common among them, they get their beliefs from talking heads on the internet and don't do original anything including thought. All they know of the Wikileaks DNC data are a few lines of text extracted from the leaks given to them with a thought guide for how to interpret it.
Click to expand...
Lol

The original swallower of official state propaganda accuses others of being told what to think.

What a joke.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
There was bias shown towards Clinton in their rhetoric is about all I could see that was going on. Otherwise, agree with you. It was just back office crap. Not much there. The "conspiracies" claimed to be shown in those e-mails by Berners is bunk.
Click to expand...
You're making contradictory claims; A. the information obtained by the DNC leaks was inconsequential, B. the leaks helped contribute to Hillary Clinton's loss to Trump

So which is it?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You're making contradictory claims; A. the information obtained by the DNC leaks was inconsequential, B. the leaks helped contribute to Hillary Clinton's loss to Trump

So which is it?
Click to expand...
When will Bernie release all his internal campaign emails?

Or even just his fucking taxes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top