Assange the rapist headed to face the music

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
Some people (ah-hem) pick the worst possible people to defend.

And I almost threw up with the Ellsburg pic.

Comparing Ellsburg to Assange is like comparing JFK to Trump.

Give me a fucking break.
Click to expand...
I'm defending whistle blowers and the 1st amendment protections of journalists. Cry now about Assange, bitch later about the Washington Post or NYT being censored under the presidence you're espousing now
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I noticed when none of you have a reply to the question or subject being raised, you simply shitpost to distract. Was that the main tactic discussed behind the scenes in the group message?
Click to expand...
when is bernie gonna release all of his campaign's internal emails?

or even his fucking taxes for that matter
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I'm defending whistle blowers and the 1st amendment protections of journalists. Cry now about Assange, bitch later about the Washington Post or NYT being censored under the presidence you're espousing now
Click to expand...
assange is not a journalist, he peddles russian propaganda

you are so incredibly far lost to even attempt to equate the two

how do you even find time to post with your 120 hour workweek?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I'm defending whistle blowers and the 1st amendment protections of journalists. Cry now about Assange, bitch later about the Washington Post or NYT being censored under the presidence you're espousing now
Click to expand...
'precedent'

Your point is valid and the fake liberal here have amply demonstrated their willingness to throw the First Amendment away.

They could give a shit about saving our democracy.

Fake liberals, both of them.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
'precedent'

Your point is valid and the fake liberal here have amply demonstrated their willingness to throw the First Amendment away.

They could give a shit about saving our democracy.

Fake liberals, both of them.
Click to expand...
I don't call them fake liberals, I call them what they are what they don't deny; moderate Democrats

Their slogan should be "Pragmatism over principle!" because every once in a while, you have to sell your constituents down the river to remain a serious participant in the conversation of which donor get's which handout at their expense..
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I'm defending whistle blowers and the 1st amendment protections of journalists. Cry now about Assange, bitch later about the Washington Post or NYT being censored under the presidence you're espousing now
Click to expand...
1st amendment protections of Australian election tamperers being fed hacked info by Russians PURELY for political purposes?

That's twisted.

Let's review again.

Assange, foreign national, election tampering in direct colIuslon with Russians, known to lie, hates Hillary.

Putin, murderous dictator, tampered in as many as 20 free elections and literally kills poIitical opponents at home and abroad, hates Hillary.

You, hates Hillary.

I see a goddamn rhetoric pattern between the 3 of you. But keep claiming 1st amendment protection. You have it, at least.
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Ah so that makes it okay?

By your (miserable excuse for) logic, everyone is a rapist until actually proven innocent.
Click to expand...
Let's review:

The Swedish authorities wanted to question Assange about allegations of rape. Rather than simply go to Sweden and be interviewed by the authorities and clear it all up, Assange stayed in England and fought it.

Once England agreed to extradite Assange to Sweden, he fled to the Ecuadorian embassy and pleaded for and was granted asylum (Where he remained to this day.)

Those are NOT the actions of an innocent man. Those are the actions of a criminal that knows full well he's in a world of shit.

After that, the United States wanted to question him as well about classified documents that wound up on his site WikiLeaks. Assange refused to be interviewed by the United States authorities because (he stated at the time) he was afraid that it was a ploy for them to arrest him and extradite him to Sweden to answer the rape charges.

So, in order to appease Assange and help the United States, Sweden agreed to drop the charges so that Assange would have no reason to believe that the U.S. was acting on their behalf.

Assange then refused to be questioned by U.S. authorities because he was afraid they would arrest him for espionage charges.

Again, these are NOT the actions of an innocent man. These are the actions of a full blown criminal on multiple fronts.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Let's review:

The Swedish authorities wanted to question Assange about allegations of rape. Rather than simply go to Sweden and be interviewed by the authorities and clear it all up, Assange stayed in England and fought it.

Once England agreed to extradite Assange to Sweden, he fled to the Ecuadorian embassy and pleaded for and was granted asylum (Where he remained to this day.)

Those are NOT the actions of an innocent man. Those are the actions of a criminal that knows full well he's in a world of shit.

After that, the United States wanted to question him as well about classified documents that wound up on his site WikiLeaks. Assange refused to be interviewed by the United States authorities because (he stated at the time) he was afraid that it was a ploy for them to arrest him and extradite him to Sweden to answer the rape charges.

So, in order to appease Assange and help the United States, Sweden agreed to drop the charges so that Assange would have no reason to believe that the U.S. was acting on their behalf.

Assange then refused to be questioned by U.S. authorities because he was afraid they would arrest him for espionage charges.

Again, these are NOT the actions of an innocent man. These are the actions of a full blown criminal on multiple fronts.
Click to expand...
Can't Trump pardon him for his Swedish rapes?
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I noticed when none of you have a reply to the question or subject being raised, you simply shitpost to distract. Was that the main tactic discussed behind the scenes in the group message?
Click to expand...
Sorry, I don't take you seriously. You are a sad, intolerant person with a sense of moral superiority only matched by Tty. I will savage your posts as I see fit. You will declare victory regardless because the only thing that matters to you is validating your own bloated ego.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top