Ralph Nader interviewed by Chris Hedges

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
Why bother telling black people to fuck off when you can do it more subtly and anonymously in the name of the "free market"?
Click to expand...
That is an emotion laden comment without any substance. It illustrates your inability to engage or rebut my point. Strawman Potato. Fail.

 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I see what you are saying, but the free market does not and should not work that way. You should not be allowed to discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin
Click to expand...

If a person should not be "allowed" the ability to chose their own human interactions (on their own property no less) on a basis they chose, would it be safe to say that you believe it is okay to force a neutral person, into a human relationship using a gun to ensure the interaction takes place?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
And that's why we mercilessly rebut @Rob Roy's drivel every time we see it.

It's wrong, even if the Supreme Court thinks it's okay for bakeries in Colorado to do it.
Click to expand...

It's wrong to force an unwilling person to interact with you, if they are willing to leave you alone isn't it? If you disagree, how can you say that you believe every person is equal, if your wishes supersede another neutral parties wishes ?

You don't really keep people locked in your basement do you?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
If a person should not be "allowed" the ability to chose their own human interactions (on their own property no less) on a basis they chose, would it be safe to say that you believe it is okay to force a neutral person, into a human relationship using a gun to ensure the interaction takes place?
Click to expand...
Learn the difference between a private property/business, and a property/business open to the public. Until then we really are just going in circles with your ignorance.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Learn the difference between a private property/business, and a property/business open to the public. Until then we really are just going in circles with your ignorance.
Click to expand...
So, what you're saying is people that are "government" can make nonsensical distinctions about other peoples property that people who aren't government cannot make. That people who are government are "more equal" than other non government people and that when they use threats of force against a neutral persons property they are exempt from any rules about using initiatory force.

In other words, you don't really believe in equality, since you fawningly drop to your knees and gobble the idea in order to "create equality", inequality of choice, featuring government people as superior within a hierarchy magically empowered with the right to forcibly make others choices for them about their bodies and property, is the way to do it.

After you've read the foregoing a few times (you'll stumble on the first reading) you will be bewildered and feel a cognitive dissonant sensation, then you will talk about my mother and wearing dresses, being hopelessly lost to form any kind of coherent response.

Yes...ahem...going in circles.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
So, what you're saying is people that are "government" can make nonsensical distinctions about other peoples property that people who aren't government cannot make. That people who are government are "more equal" than other non government people and that when they use threats of force against a neutral persons property they are exempt from any rules about using initiatory force.

In other words, you don't really believe in equality, since you fawningly drop to your knees and gobble the idea in order to "create equality", inequality of choice, featuring government people as superior within a hierarchy magically empowered with the right to forcibly make others choices for them about their bodies and property, is the way to do it.

After you've read the foregoing a few times (you'll stumble on the first reading) you will be bewildered and feel a cognitive dissonant sensation, then you will talk about my mother and wearing dresses, being hopelessly lost to form any kind of coherent response.

Yes...ahem...going in circles.
Click to expand...
The government are the people and you really should know this. Now do all the people VOTE for the best person to represent them in their government. Hell no. You yourself do not vote and allow OTHER people to select the PEOPLE who makes up your government that consist of people. I myself vote and would like the best people to be elected in government. No government will lead directly to anarchy and a lawless nation. Where as you nor your wife would be safe nor your property. Do you really think that If we do away with government the world would magically be better ? Not in this day and age and I think you are a fool to believe such.
If I asked who do you vote for on a local level you would tell me what ? If I asked have you ever attempted to run for a local office yourself, you would tell me what ? You hate property tax but what have you done by self to make any changes to your millage rate where you live ? I mean run for Commissioner and see what change you can bring about, instead of sitting on your arse and wishing for anarchy to make a change. That change would not be a pleasing. IMHO

Now after I have made my response we can now talk about your beautiful mother and the dresses you like to wear of hers. I pray that you are able to comprehend my retort and not hopelessly lost to form any kind of coherent response or repeat the same bullshit about a utopia that does not exist in actuality .
 
Last edited:
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
So, what you're saying is people that are "government" can make nonsensical distinctions about other peoples property that people who aren't government cannot make. That people who are government are "more equal" than other non government people and that when they use threats of force against a neutral persons property they are exempt from any rules about using initiatory force.

In other words, you don't really believe in equality, since you fawningly drop to your knees and gobble the idea in order to "create equality", inequality of choice, featuring government people as superior within a hierarchy magically empowered with the right to forcibly make others choices for them about their bodies and property, is the way to do it.

After you've read the foregoing a few times (you'll stumble on the first reading) you will be bewildered and feel a cognitive dissonant sensation, then you will talk about my mother and wearing dresses, being hopelessly lost to form any kind of coherent response.

Yes...ahem...going in circles.
Click to expand...
Can you do me a favor and start your own thread? None of what you've been arguing about this whole thread has one single solitary thing to do with the thread topic, which is Chris Hedges' interview of Ralph Nader.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Learn the difference between a private property/business, and a property/business open to the public. Until then we really are just going in circles with your ignorance.
Click to expand...
I'd love to see his reaction to the reception he'd get to a sign in the window of his business 'politely' asking gays, blacks, Jews and apostates to shop elsewhere!
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Can you do me a favor and start your own thread? None of what you've been arguing about this whole thread has one single solitary thing to do with the thread topic, which is Chris Hedges' interview of Ralph Nader.
Click to expand...
Will do. Thanks for asking nicely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top