Why is this place to noxious?

[choomer]

I'm actually interested, is this a correct account of your previous statements? I'm not interested in shitposting, I'd rather have political discussion.

Unfortunately that will be difficult here as there is a dedicated sect (with moderator support) whose sole aim seems to be anything but posting rational thought.

Sorry.

 

[Shua1991]

you act like that's a bad idea or something

Its an awful idea, especially when it's sanctioned by angovernment, if it's private citizens doing the killing, then that makes them murderers. People who commit murder do not belong in society, and should be separated and exiled or imprisoned. I'm not someone who believes Nazis deserve any more rights than you

 

[UncleBuck]

Its an awful idea, especially when it's sanctioned by angovernment, if it's private citizens doing the killing, then that makes them murderers. People who commit murder do not belong in society, and should be separated and exiled or imprisoned. I'm not someone who believes Nazis deserve any more rights than you

we shot nazis between the eyes for years on end and it led to the greatest celebration in human history

 

[choomer]

https://www.rollitup.org/t/all-the-news-that-isnt.927698/page-9
start here
choomer never dares to say one bad word about a website that discusses "the jewish problem" and encourages literal nazis to intimidate jewish families

Why skip ahead to page 9 if it (being my thread that has probably been altered if history remains constant) "unmasks" me so?

One site in a list of over 100 and that is the one you seem to have the most interest in.
Makes you wonder why.

 

[UncleBuck]

Why skip ahead to page 9 if it (being my thread that has probably been altered if history remains constant) "unmasks" me so?

One site in a list of over 100 and that is the one you seem to have the most interest in.
Makes you wonder why.

and still you dare not utter one bad word against andrew anglin (who is 5'1'') or the neo-nazi daily stormer website

 

[choomer]

and still you dare not utter one bad word against andrew anglin (who is 5'1'') or the neo-nazi daily stormer website

I don't care to lend credence to your conspiracy theories except to troll you into doing it more.
It's worked so far, why change now?

 

[Shua1991]

Unfortunately that will be difficult here as there is a dedicated sect (with moderator support) whose sole aim seems to be anything but posting rational thought.

Sorry.

Do you find the literature and 'journalism' on stormfront or other white-nationalist websites/forums to be informative, or honest in their depictions of world events? Have you noticed the conspiritorial perspective of these sites? To me the outlook these sites provide almost seems like they need a Boogeyman, and it just so happens they know who it is. I don't want to assume you actually believe what they espouse, but if you do, id want to know why. Just so you know I'm not actually looking to waste your time, I'll tell you that I'm not someone who is supportive of any race/ethnicity based political movement, I am interested in how said people rationalize their worldview.

 

[abandonconflict]

It seems as if there isn't any persuit to having actual policy discussion, debate, or citing sources to support the arguments prrsented here. Seems like this sub has taken a deep dive since 2014. I haven't been on this site for years till recently, what happened? Is this shitposting about politics?

So you started a thread to talk about shitposting...

Please stop being non-smart.

 

[choomer]

Do you find the literature and 'journalism' on stormfront or other white-nationalist websites/forums to be informative, or honest in their depictions of world events? Have you noticed the conspiritorial perspective of these sites? To me the outlook these sites provide almost seems like they need a Boogeyman, and it just so happens they know who it is.

I've never been there so I don't know.
I have to rely on Buckold's wealth of knowledge about it.

 

[Shua1991]

I've never been there so I don't know.
I have to rely on Buckold's wealth of knowledge about it.

Where do you get your news of current events, and can you honestly describe your political beliefs. For example, I would likely be considered 'social democrat' or left-libertarian on most political compass tests. So a bit further left than what many would find 'center left'. I'm not interested in character assassination, just curious.

 

[Shua1991]

So you started a thread to talk about shitposting...

Please stop being non-smart.

Thanks, I appreciate your input. Feel free to contribute.

 

[Grandpapy]

adjective: noxious
harmful, poisonous, or very unpleasant.
"they were overcome by the noxious fumes"
synonyms: poisonous, toxic, deadly, harmful, dangerous, pernicious, damaging, destructive;More
unpleasant, nasty, disgusting, awful, dreadful, horrible, terrible;
vile, revolting, foul, nauseating, appalling, offensive;
malodorous, fetid, putrid;
informalghastly, horrid;
literarynoisome
"noxious fumes"
antonyms: innocuous

It's only a problem when the heat generated melts Snowflakes.

 

[choomer]

Where do you get your news of current events, and can you honestly describe your political beliefs. For example, I would likely be considered 'social democrat' or left-libertarian on most political compass tests. So a bit further left than what many would find 'center left'. I'm not interested in character assassination, just curious.

I try not to box myself in to others descriptions of policy.

Think of it this way:
A party is great fun when you're "in the moment", but the morning after you can't remember most of what you did, regret what you do remember, and wonder which of those people you told everyone you love so much last night defecated in your mouth while you were sleeping.

I vote for people, not parties.

 

[Shua1991]

adjective: noxious
harmful, poisonous, or very unpleasant.
"they were overcome by the noxious fumes"
synonyms: poisonous, toxic, deadly, harmful, dangerous, pernicious, damaging, destructive;More
unpleasant, nasty, disgusting, awful, dreadful, horrible, terrible;
vile, revolting, foul, nauseating, appalling, offensive;
malodorous, fetid, putrid;
informalghastly, horrid;
literarynoisome
"noxious fumes"
antonyms: innocuous

It's only a problem when the heat generated melts Snowflakes.

Im fine with

I try not to box myself in to others descriptions of policy.

Think of it this way:
A party is great fun when you're "in the moment", but the morning after you can't remember most of what you did, regret what you do remember, and wonder which of those people you told everyone you love so much last night defecated in your mouth while you were sleeping.

I vote for people, not parties.

Sure that's nice and all, but what would you say consider to be your ideal living environment, how would you see government(if any in your opinion) be structured, would it be egalitarian, or segregated? How do you choose who you vote for, are there any principles that need to be adhered prior to placing your vote? That's what I'm interested in knowing. All humans have biases, I'm curious about yours.

 

[UncleBuck]

I don't care to lend credence to your conspiracy theories except to troll you into doing it more.
It's worked so far, why change now?

it's not a conspiracy theory, it's a fact

you will never say one bad word about neo-nazis. ever

 

[UncleBuck]

I've never been there so I don't know..

 

[Shua1991]

As an aside, I've spent about two years listening and posting to some 'Anti-fa' (Antifascist) forums and blogs, as well as reading up on white nationalism, and the recent new face of segregationist politics 'ethno-nationalist/identitarian/Alt-Right' online gathering spaces. I actually want to know what they believe, only then can I form a rational argument that can hope to change their radical views or rebut the opinions/logical fallacies in their arguments. There's plenty in common with modern Antifascist rhetoric and what I've read on white-nationalist forums; moreso to do with similar psychology, tribalism and their views toward in-group and out-group.

 

[UncleBuck]

I try not to box myself in to others descriptions of policy.

translation: to embarrassed to own up to his nazi ideation

 

[UncleBuck]

I actually want to know what they believe, only then can I form a rational argument that can hope to change their radical views

we all already know what they believe and there is no way to change their minds about it. besides, of course, a bullet through the eyeballs

 

[Shua1991]

we all already know what they believe and there is no way to change their minds about it. besides, of course, a bullet through the eyeballs

I have an idea as to what they believe, but I grew up in a religious setting(cultish if you ask me) and I know people can be reasoned out of certain beliefs if given certain evidence, arguements and stimulus. I'm not interested in tribal dissociation.

 

[UncleBuck]

people can be reasoned out of certain beliefs if given certain evidence, arguements and stimulus.

go watch documentaries on the einsatzgruppen. decades later and they still believe they were doing the right thing by rounding up and massacring the jews.

the best way to alter a nazi's mind is with a bullet