Your yield on a HLG550?

kdt15

Active Member
Wondering if anyone could share some stats on their yields for an HLG550. I believe most people use one in 4x4.
 

skoomd

Well-Known Member
I don't know yet, but if it was 550 grams you'd be murdering it i think. And if the 600 did 600 grams fucking hand jobs would be in order to everyone. I mean thats just me though. Your thoughts?
Some dude here just pulled 1.9 grams per watt his second ever grow under samsung strips, so those numbers are easily possible if the setup is dialed in and the right strains are grown
 
Last edited:

kdt15

Active Member
Some dude here just pulled 1.9 grams per watt his second ever grow under samsung strips, so those numbers are definitely possible if the setup is dialed in and the right strains are grown
awesome! do you have a link or name i can look up?
 

kdt15

Active Member
I don't know yet, but if it was 550 grams you'd be murdering it i think. And if the 600 did 600 grams fucking hand jobs would be in order to everyone. I mean thats just me though. Your thoughts?
no results yet but ive always thought 1 was a standard, just didnt know what the upper limits were. was hoping 1.5 was somewhat doable, and 2 if really perfected!
 

CobKits

Well-Known Member
theres a lot of factors, strain, space you have to grow in, growers skill, etc etc

in general (real round numbers)
SE HPS: 0.6-1.2
DE HPS: 0.8-1.5
CMH: 1-1.6
LEDS: 0.5-2.0 (huge range because LEDs cover so many different designs, there is no "standard"

a typical phosphor white of good system efficiency (1.6-2.2 umol/J) should be able to do 1.2-2.0
 

kdt15

Active Member
theres a lot of factors, strain, space you have to grow in, growers skill, etc etc

in general (real round numbers)
SE HPS: 0.6-1.2
DE HPS: 0.8-1.5
CMH: 1-1.6
LEDS: 0.5-2.0 (huge range because LEDs cover so many different designs, there is no "standard"

a typical phosphor white of good system efficiency (1.6-2.2 umol/J) should be able to do 1.2-2.0
awesome, thanks for the info. i guess my 1g/w was more of an HPS figure rather than LED.

how can an LED design (using same, good lights) end up with vastly different yields, I mean a watt is a watt regardless of design right? unless the range is due to nutes and poor growing method/conditions?
 

skoomd

Well-Known Member
Because LEDs have a wide array of different spectrums and more importantly, efficiencies. The more efficient a light is (either measured by lumens/watt or umol/joule) the more it can yield per watt.
 
Last edited:

CobKits

Well-Known Member
how can an LED design (using same, good lights) end up with vastly different yields,
not all of them are good lights

I mean a watt is a watt regardless of design right?
no! or there would be no incentive to use one type of light over another. CFLs to the best LEDs span a huge range of photosynthetic efficiency, like 0.7-2.2 umol/J

the following is worth a read despite the fact that the LEDs in that study were from 2013-2014 and most are sub-HPS in efficiency:

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099010

once you get a handle of umol/J then you can make sense when an LED vendor quotes a umol/J or PPF (NOT PPFD!) number

umol/J = (PPF)/(input wattage)

PPFD = spot measurement which by itself is useless (slightly more useful as a PAR map at a distance but still doesnt tell you overall efficiency)
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
I don't know yet, but if it was 550 grams you'd be murdering it i think. And if the 600 did 600 grams fucking hand jobs would be in order to everyone. I mean thats just me though. Your thoughts?
My first 600w HID grow I yielded a GPW of dry flower. (scrog). I should of yielded more as I didn't fill the net so 1.5 GPW from a single 600HID is achievable.
You would think the same W in LED should easily give you 1.5 GPW

Its all about filling the canopy.
 
Last edited:

kdt15

Active Member
not all of them are good lights



no! or there would be no incentive to use one type of light over another. CFLs to the best LEDs span a huge range of photosynthetic efficiency, like 0.7-2.2 umol/J

the following is worth a read despite the fact that the LEDs in that study were from 2013-2014 and most are sub-HPS in efficiency:

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099010

once you get a handle of umol/J then you can make sense when an LED vendor quotes a umol/J or PPF (NOT PPFD!) number

umol/J = (PPF)/(input wattage)

PPFD = spot measurement which by itself is useless (slightly more useful as a PAR map at a distance but still doesnt tell you overall efficiency)
watched the video, thanks. going to go thru that journal post over time since its quite dense!

so the key is to get the best umol/J for LED's when determining quality? I'm hoping the high end (1.9, 2) of that 0.5-2.0g/w for led is the samsung diodes?
 
Top