hybridway2
Amare Shill
I think the shape of their hood has allot to do w/ it & may just change the readings you're comparing using a different horizontal fixture. But to get the same from a 630 DE as the vert 315 is kind've crazy. Just a center reading right?My vertical 315s with a philips 3100k bulb measures higher par readings than my horizontally positioned 630w true double ended 3000k cmh from growers choice @ equal distances. The 315 covers 3x3
So double the wattage use yet lower par readings than the vertcal 315s.. In all honesty, no bias, the only conclusion I can draw there is the significant difference in vert vs horiz.
I said the same thing. FuzzyLogic. Reading up on other low freq sq wave ballasts, they a seam to do the same. soft start, compensated power for bulb, ect....Lol, fuzzy logic, aptly named "feature"........tell us what your sensing through a lamp cord again? Cmh arc degrades per fire , like all hid bulbs. Idk how your doubling lumen maintenance, I smell something...
I'm not getting into reflector design, but cycloptics tech vert one tested highest of all (Utah state)? . Remember still over half the bulb is getting losses with hort positioning, plus 3< output loss and spec shift vers vert==Elite agro run optimally in vertical positioning, ask Phillips., Ask nate at growers house which 315 w ballast/ bulb combo tests highest again and again.
Run it vert bare bulb if you're an efficiency whore & deal with the pita room setup; )
Idk. Maybe there's more to it I'm not getting.
Been so focused on led for so long I'm out of the loop.