Official Novichok Dissent Thread

ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Considering how the US blew up the Twin Towers in an inside job to justify the invasion of Afghanistan and to lure Bernie Sanders into supporting US eternal war, then Democrats took over the DNC to prevent universal healthcare. All stemming from the UK's royal family murdering Lady Di in order to keep dirty Arab or is it Greek hands off what had been royal furniture. When Jack Ruby killed Oswald, the dominoes fell in line.

So it's becoming completely clear why the UK would poison about a hundred of it's own citizens including a first responder and medical staff at the hospital in order to frame Putin and prevent him from promoting peace in the world.
Click to expand...
Lol

Do you need your medication refilled or something?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Carrying russia's water right now is not a good idea after the fucking they are giving yer country, yer free to say what you will, others are free to disagree and you won't win any popularity contests. Clearly the media and others here are not buying the disinformation either, Vlad is a murdering fuck who attacked America and is robbing his country blind while leading it down the path to perdition.

Ridicule is an appropriate response to ridiculous ideas, it's hardwired into humans as protection from bullshit, and is not to be abused, though it often is.

How did the snopes search turn out?
Click to expand...
That's just it. You're falling right in line with those who say no proof is needed if 'Russia did it!!!' but that's bullshit and you're abdicating your responsibility as a citizen if you attack those who want proof, rather than demanding it yourself.

It's amazing how Americans are so willing to believe whatever shit they see on the teevee and even defend it against those who would question a very thin story line.

Critical thinking. I know it's hard, but it's good for you. Like eating your spinach.

By the way, in the 'who's fucking who?' department, let's not forget that US covert action was behind both Yeltsin's election and the anti Russian 'revolution' in Ukraine... and much, much more. Yes, Putin is a thug and I'm not disputing that. Americans are thugs too; post WWII history is littered with the evidence. We aren't any fucking better because we're Americans or that we believe in our own exceptionalism.

It's as if you're programmed to fall in line with whatever bullshit the US government feeds you, no matter how stupid, outlandish or criminal it might be.
 
Last edited:
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Shit thread posted by a classic fake conspiracy addict.

0 out of three stars

would not recommend to friends

didn't watch the video and tty's reputation for posting propaganda is well known.
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]


cliff notes version next time?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Right. Because you sure know the difference.
Click to expand...
Well, you don't. Take this fake news story you continue to spout:

"Bernie is the most popular politician."

Some polls, maybe but he's slipped totally. Biden is doing better, not that I want either to be be prez.

Where Bernie is doing so very badly is when the question is asked: "would you be likely to vote for Bernie Sanders to be president."

55% polled said no; 39% said yes

Biden, 44% no, 48% yes.

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2513

One particular lawmaker who is considered a front-runner by many liberals would not appear to have the support needed to beat Trump: Sanders. When asked whether they’d be inclined to vote for Sanders, 55 percent of those surveyed said no.

It has become a common argument on the left when lamenting Trump that had Sanders been the Democratic nominee over Hillary Clinton, he would have attracted enough support to beat Trump. The argument is that liberals who did not back Clinton would have voted for Sanders, along with some of the white working-class voters and men who ultimately chose Trump.


However, this most recent poll suggests that may not be the case today.

In other words, you Bernie Babies are delusional about "Bernie would have won" and "Bernie will win. It's just an opinion poll but it takes the wind out of that sail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/18/the-democrat-trump-should-fear-the-most-in-2020-and-its-not-oprah/?utm_term=.a6196efd94e3
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Well, you don't. Take this fake news story you continue to spout:

"Bernie is the most popular politician."

Some polls, maybe but he's slipped totally. Biden is doing better, not that I want either to be be prez.

Where Bernie is doing so very badly is when the question is asked: "would you be likely to vote for Bernie Sanders to be president."

55% polled said no; 39% said yes

Biden, 44% no, 48% yes.

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2513

One particular lawmaker who is considered a front-runner by many liberals would not appear to have the support needed to beat Trump: Sanders. When asked whether they’d be inclined to vote for Sanders, 55 percent of those surveyed said no.

It has become a common argument on the left when lamenting Trump that had Sanders been the Democratic nominee over Hillary Clinton, he would have attracted enough support to beat Trump. The argument is that liberals who did not back Clinton would have voted for Sanders, along with some of the white working-class voters and men who ultimately chose Trump.


However, this most recent poll suggests that may not be the case today.

In other words, you Bernie Babies are delusional about "Bernie would have won" and "Bernie will win. It's just an opinion poll but it takes the wind out of that sail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/01/18/the-democrat-trump-should-fear-the-most-in-2020-and-its-not-oprah/?utm_term=.a6196efd94e3
Click to expand...
I'd welcome a race between Biden and Sanders.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top