Guns in school

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
View attachment 4104538

Liar^^

Some thoughts on this. I was twittering and seen his post on it today saying he's seeing how the state's handle it on their own.

I feel like it's a much bigger (should be federal) than a state issue.

Is there a safe way to have guns in school? I don't think so. I've had some teachers in high school that probably would of shot me given the chance. Also I'm sure they won't get proper instruction on handling a firearm.

If I had kids I'd home school them... only a matter of time until a teacher snaps and starts shooting kids...

Sorry about the rambling thread. Any opinions or ideas?
(Other then stricter background/mental checks) that one makes too much sense so it'll never happen with a government owned by the nra

If you removed guns from the government school equation, how would you fund government schools ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i think your taxes fund schools. and roads. and bridges. and ambulances. and police. and fire.

thanks for paying your taxes like a real 'Murican.

Yet, all of those things could still exist if they weren't funded using guns to fund them.

Why do you like to use guns to fund things is the question you are avoiding.

Thanks for being against using guns in offensive ways at least SOME of the time. Best wishes to cure your habit of using them to get the things you like.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
I agree with you, and I'd add adult molesters shouldn't have guns either.

So, do you think guns shouldn't be used to fund government schools or is that kind of molestation one you support?
The first part actually made me lol

I don't think school teachers should have guns. Maybe an armed security guard or even a cop or vet. If teachers were the kind of people ready to engage in a shoot out, I don't think they would of chose teaching as a career
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Yet, all of those things could still exist if they weren't funded using guns to fund them.

Why do you like to use guns to fund things is the question you are avoiding.

Thanks for being against using guns in offensive ways at least SOME of the time. Best wishes to cure your habit of using them to get the things you like.
We have people like yourself who used the system by sending 3 of their children and self, to get an education at public schooling, but yet complain when they have to pay up for said education. So in a since and to make you understand guns can be used to stop theft. Without guns people like yourself would just keep stealing from the rest of us. When will you be filing your taxes
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
We have people like yourself who used the system by sending 3 of their children and self, to get an education at public schooling, but yet complain when they have to pay up for said education. So in a since and to make you understand guns can be used to stop theft. Without guns people like yourself would just keep stealing from the rest of us. When will you be filing your taxes

About how many years and how much money do you think I paid into the childrens indoctrination programs and what would the cost of educating kids be if there were real competition allowed are the questions you will likely ignore if you stick with this conversation, you know after I begin to expose your duplicity and fallacious arguments, right before you run away or start talking about your lost and found dryer panty collection.

So, should people be forced to pay for things they don't use ? Is that your argument ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
The first part actually made me lol

I don't think school teachers should have guns. Maybe an armed security guard or even a cop or vet. If teachers were the kind of people ready to engage in a shoot out, I don't think they would of chose teaching as a career
That's a good point, most teachers wouldn't use a gun to rob you for their pay, they're happy to let the system do it for them, so they don't have to wrestle with their conscience and they can continue to believe they are delivering a valid service, even though nobody really believes robbing people is valid.
 

Ripped Farmer

Well-Known Member
View attachment 4104538

Liar^^

Some thoughts on this. I was twittering and seen his post on it today saying he's seeing how the state's handle it on their own.

I feel like it's a much bigger (should be federal) than a state issue.

Is there a safe way to have guns in school? I don't think so. I've had some teachers in high school that probably would of shot me given the chance. Also I'm sure they won't get proper instruction on handling a firearm.

If I had kids I'd home school them... only a matter of time until a teacher snaps and starts shooting kids...

Sorry about the rambling thread. Any opinions or ideas?
(Other then stricter background/mental checks) that one makes too much sense so it'll never happen with a government owned by the nra
Until schools were gun free zones we had guns in school. They were visible in vehicles in parking lots, and most those rigs were always left unlocked. We would even bring them INSIDE during hunting season as the shop teacher was big into bird hunting so we'd lay em all out on the tables and lie about how good of a shot we all were.

No one died.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Was a 5 star thread then Roberta showed up
Still haven't figured out a way to enforce your gun confiscation laws without using guns to confiscate them yet have you?

You should sit down, before you fall down from all that spinning around your circular arguments get you into.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i prefer funding things with primers. without primers, ammo doesn't fire and renders guns worthless.

i drove on I-25 yesterday which your taxes helped fund. thanks!

there is a decent size pothole around mile marker 141 that you should repair though.
You are insinuating that without confiscatory taxes, roads would not exist. That's false. That's like saying if government collectives produced food, like they did rather inefficiently in Communist countries, without Communism, everybody would starve.

Logic and possibility of better ways are not your strong suits I see. Try harder to formulate a defendable argument please, I'm getting bored with all the low hanging fruit.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
About how many years and how much money do you think I paid into the childrens indoctrination programs and what would the cost of educating kids be if there were real competition allowed are the questions you will likely ignore if you stick with this conversation, you know after I begin to expose your duplicity and fallacious arguments, right before you run away or start talking about your lost and found dryer panty collection.

So, should people be forced to pay for things they don't use ? Is that your argument ?
you have three kids, who all went to public schooling. You yourself have used public schooling. What you and your children learned will last and help for a life time. SO NO you have not paid up yet. Hell I'm thinking you have not even made a dent
When will you file this year ?
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Until schools were gun free zones we had guns in school. They were visible in vehicles in parking lots, and most those rigs were always left unlocked. We would even bring them INSIDE during hunting season as the shop teacher was big into bird hunting so we'd lay em all out on the tables and lie about how good of a shot we all were.

No one died.
Nice story. Your childhood was truly representative of all the schools in this country :roll:. How large would you say your school was?

If more guns means fewer gun homicides or mass shootings, isn't 360,000,000 guns in the US enough to disprove this theory?

Households are less safe when they own a gun than those who don't. Not by a lot but a little less safe.



Your ability with numbers and statistics is laughable. I'm guessing you went to school when accidental gun deaths were high. You'd need about 800,000 attending your school to be likely to have 1-2 deaths from a gun. You should educate yourself some (even a little would be nice), you might not get laughed at so much. I mean, yeah, nobody died, dummy.

3.6 million teachers in the US. If 20% carry a gun, that makes 820,000 teachers with a gun. On top of the deaths in mass shootings that are completely unlikely to be stopped by a teacher with a hand gun, at least 2-4 kids will die from an accidental gun death each year. I'm not even including kids deliberately shot by a nervous or homicidal teacher.

You gun nuts keep demanding we do things that make no sense and hypothetical when gun control laws are proven to work.
 
Last edited:
Top