NYC's Board of Elections will admit it purged more than 200,000 voters from city rolls

and that's why she cheated because the Democratic party's majority did not want Bernie to be their candidate in 2016.

you see, there is no god, karma or 'what goes around comes around'..there's only the sum total of your actions..plus, i understand Podesta makes a mean risotto.
Seems to me that there is more than a whiff of sexism and racism in your claim. Can you explain why only white men were not affected by the cheating that only you and a few nobodies who know nothing claim occurred? Are you saying that black people more easily fooled?
 
I'm looking forward to your explanation why black people only voted for Bernie at 20%, Hispanic at 30% and women at 45% while only white men voted for Bernie at 60%.

Crowd size? What's your theory about how that indicates rigged?

Don't forget both Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount.

Name recognition. 7-11 morning coffee caucus nobody knew who he was. Minority male only were asked. That was even right before the primary.

You can bet they know who he is now..
 
Last edited:
Bern didn't have much practice with minoritis in VT. if i calculated correctly, there's about 18000 blacks and latinos in the whole state per the last census. .
 
Bern didn't have much practice with minoritis in VT. if i calculated correctly, there's about 18000 blacks and latinos in the whole state per the last census. .
True, that. Sanders has been honing the message to white people for 17 years. His message was well received by white liberals, especially white male liberals in the primary.

I guess pointing out the truth is tantamount to cheating @schuylaar

"Bernie Sanders as mayor, as a member of the House, as a member of the United States Senate, has been missing in action on issues that are important to the African Americans," said Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York. "There’s no credibility to the things that are being said at the twilight of his political career."

"It's good to have new friends, I would prefer to have a true friend," Jeffries said.

Rutherford joined Jeffries in sharply denouncing Sanders for being "missing in action" on issues that matter to black voters.

Rutherford faulted Sanders for voting in favor of a 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which has been blamed for helping to usher in an era of mass incarceration. Former president Bill Clinton, who signed the bill into law, has expressed regret for the consequences of the legislation.

Another Clinton endorser on the call, Hazel Dukes, a former president of the New York chapter of the NAACP, suggested that Sanders never had to think about issues that concern African Americans because he was an elected official in a state that is "essentially homogeneous."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...anders-on-race-issues/?utm_term=.897dbe90ee48

Since the election, I can find no evidence of Bernie trying to bring Democrats together or reaching out to the Democratic black, brown or women voters who, by not voting for him, were behind his loss in 2016. His name recognition will be better but that isn't going to equate to a victory. Raising wages for everybody doesn't change wage disparity. Nor does it mean cops are less likely to murder a kid for driving while black.
 
You were the one who talked about how big money swung the election. I just pointed out that:

Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount.
Bernie only managed to get the white male majority.

Can you refute these facts?

In light of the fact that Bernie spent the same amount as Hillary, how can you claim that big money swung the election?
Funny. When I fact checked this assertion,I found that the Sanders campaign was outspent by over 3:1 by the Clinton campaign.

http://presidential-candidates.insidegov.com/compare/35-40/Bernie-Sanders-vs-Hillary-Clinton

If you have to misrepresent the facts to make your points, maybe they aren't valid?
 
Funny. When I fact checked this assertion,I found that the Sanders campaign was outspent by over 3:1 by the Clinton campaign.

http://presidential-candidates.insidegov.com/compare/35-40/Bernie-Sanders-vs-Hillary-Clinton

If you have to misrepresent the facts to make your points, maybe they aren't valid?
Yes, Clinton spent a little more than 800 million over the entire election cycle. This is why I broke out how much she had spent through Jul 1. I posted links containing this information a few posts earlier.

Too funny that you wouldn't notice that the amount posted on that site contained spending through the General election.

The following reply contains links the data regarding spending on the primary for both candidates.

The first link is Bernie's total spending report
The second one is Clinton's spending report through July 1

yep, that big money sure did buy the black brown and women's vote. You haven't yet explained why white men aren't affected.

Something else I don't understand. Bernie and Hillary spent the same amount. Bernie spent 220 million on his campaign. As of July 1, Clinton spent the same amount. I mean, wow, Bernie spent the same amount but lost by 12% margin. He must have been an awful campaigner. That, or he wasn't very good at running his campaign.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate?id=n00000528
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...l-campaign-fundraising/july/public/index.html

They both spent $220 million.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Clinton spent a little more than 800 million over the entire election cycle. This is why I broke out how much she had spent through Jul 1. I posted links containing this information a few posts earlier.

Too funny that you wouldn't notice that the amount posted on that site contained spending through the General election.

The following reply contains links the data regarding spending on the primary for both candidates.

The first link is Bernie's total spending report
The second one is Clinton's spending report through July 1



They both spent $220 million.
Cute misrepresentation, considering that you just admitted you've compared apples to oranges.
 
Seems to me that there is more than a whiff of sexism and racism in your claim. Can you explain why only white men were not affected by the cheating that only you and a few nobodies who know nothing claim occurred? Are you saying that black people more easily fooled?

why do you always wish to make it about race and my observations nefarious?:wall:
 
Yes, Clinton spent a little more than 800 million over the entire election cycle. This is why I broke out how much she had spent through Jul 1. I posted links containing this information a few posts earlier.

Too funny that you wouldn't notice that the amount posted on that site contained spending through the General election.

The following reply contains links the data regarding spending on the primary for both candidates.

The first link is Bernie's total spending report
The second one is Clinton's spending report through July 1



They both spent $220 million.

but Sanders raised his through $27 average while Clinton, not so much..she sucked corporate cock because it's..wait for it..easier.
 
So, you think black people, Hispanics and women don't follow the news as carefully as white men do?

not at all..i caucused those at 7-11 coffee bar random sampling. everyone was black or latino and male. if i wished white, I would've gone to Starbucks. if you have a primary and there are three people in it Clinton, Sanders and stupid ass Martin O'Malley and NO ONE has ever heard or that there are two men in the race of three people..what would you say it is? they don't follow media or media has FAILED them?:idea: my point is that it's been documented that voter suppression has occurred by our beloved media in collusion with the Clinton Camp and DNC.

now stop race baiting me..you look the FOOL, it's every post.
 
Last edited:
not at all..i caucused those at 7-11 coffee bar random sampling. everyone was black or latino and male. if i wished white, I would've gone to Starbucks. if you have a primary and there are three people in it Clinton, Sanders and stupid ass Martin O'Malley and NO ONE has ever heard or that there are two men in the race of three people..what would you say it is? they don't follow media or media has FAILED them?:idea: my point is that it's been documented that voter suppression has occurred by our beloved media in collusion with the Clinton Camp and DNC.

now stop race baiting me..you look the FOOL, it's every post.
"I talked with some black people". LOL

The Top 10 Phrases Used by People Who Claim They Are Not Racist
not a racist quotes, number 9

https://www.theroot.com/notracists-be-like-the-top-10-phrases-used-by-peop-1819142064
 
I don’t see that quote anywhere in my post that you have in the quote marks, Race Baiter.
Of course you can't understand it. #not-a-racist.

"I talked to some some black men at a 7-11". All those black men were ignorant just like the entire population of black, Hispanic and women that voted for Clinton in the primary. White men are boss. #not-a-racist

Oh, and look up race baiting. You don't understand the phrase. I'm based upon your statements that you are not-a-racist. That's not race baiting.
 
Of course you can't understand it. #not-a-racist.

"I talked to some some black men at a 7-11". All those black men were ignorant just like the entire population of black, Hispanic and women that voted for Clinton in the primary. White men are boss. #not-a-racist

Oh, and look up race baiting. You don't understand the phrase. I'm based upon your statements that you are not-a-racist. That's not race baiting.

that quote above is also not what i said..but why let the facts get in the way of your rant, Triggered Race Baiter?
 
that quote above is also not what i said..but why let the facts get in the way of your rant, Triggered Race Baiter?
I just stripped away the fluff. #not-a-racist

Your thesis is that the reason black voters voted 80% for Clinton, especially in the south, is that they were fooled by Clinton's nefarious and completely imagined "rigging" and cheating in the primary. White men weren't fooled because they pay attention to the news, but black people, Hispanics and women were because they are ignorant.

I understand how putting it all so bluntly offends you because you are #not-a-racist.
 
I just stripped away the fluff. #not-a-racist

Your thesis is that the reason black voters voted 80% for Clinton, especially in the south, is that they were fooled by Clinton's nefarious and completely imagined "rigging" and cheating in the primary. White men weren't fooled because they pay attention to the news, but black people, Hispanics and women were because they are ignorant.

I understand how putting it all so bluntly offends you because you are #not-a-racist.


I'd say that most people who read her posts see that, but Schuylaar does not.

It appears to me that people who are surrounded by rednecks are unable to see the red on their own neck.


:mrgreen:
 
Back
Top