More Guns = More Safer

[PCXV]

It just further reaffirms a vast majority of those who oppose guns know nothing about them than what the teletube tells them.

I'm willing to bet 95% of them have never even seen a .223/5.56 round. I think they assume everything just shoots a .50 cal bullet.

No, that's just the narrative the teletube sells you. They get you to focus on nitpicking pointless details and irrelavant inaccuracies so that you dismiss or forget about the legitimate arguments. But at least you know better that more guns = more safer.

 

[Cold$moke]

You can buy fully auto and cans in my state with the proper police approval

I care not for full auto as ammo is expensive enough

But i do hope to get some cans in the future

 

[PCXV]

Fully agreed

This is what happens when you didnt go to boyscouts as a child lol
Or hunted or went target shooting

I did all those things, still shoot. Don't see the need for an AR15, but I have friends and family that own them. Keep nit picking and dismissing based on irrelevant terminology though.

 

[LEDandCoffee]

No, that's just the narrative the teletube sells you. They get you to focus on nitpicking pointless details and irrelavant inaccuracies so that you dismiss or forget about the legitimate arguments. But at least you know better that more guns = more safer.

I don't watch TV. So, the teletube doesn't sell me shit.

 

[PCXV]

Can't say I was a boyscout, but I took gun safety at the age of 10 or 11, as I think everyone should.

The problem with guns is a lack of education. Both with some people whom own them, and those who oppose them.

I'd be fine with requiring some sort of class and/or test similar to a drivers license to attain guns legally.

Hell, I live in one of the only states that actually requires you to shoot a gun to get a permit to carry. A lot of states just changed it so you basically take a couple hour class and there you go. No proof of even being able to properly handle a firearm required. That's pretty silly.

Do you think every person in the US really needs to know or wants to know how to kill with a gun? You think that is desirable and will have better results? Do you even consider the unintended consequences or understand why some people are against killing no matter what the situation?

 

[LEDandCoffee]

Do you think every person in the US really needs to know or wants to know how to kill with a gun? You think that is desirable and will have better results? Do you even consider the unintended consequences or understand why some people are against killing no matter what the situation?

The point of gun education isn't to teach you how to kill someone with a gun. It's the complete opposite.

You've made it clear you've had no educational courses on guns with two comments. Good job.

If someone has a gun pointed to you and/or a loved one are you still "against killing no matter what the situation?". To each their own.

 

[PCXV]

Wow sounds like you've never got to enjoy shooting

Sorry?


If little Danny's parent do their part then nope.

If not they are probably peices of shit who deserve it .

End of story for me

Love guns but not a nut case.
I appreciate guns for the GREAT skill they reuire to master just like any skills they must be learned properly or youll develop shitty skills


Basically what you describe are punks who buy guns but never train or learn to use it properly

Every single bad thing you mentioned can be prevented by teaching kids respect and the rules of gun saftey ....
This goes for good kids not pos

And if the 4 rules (the only ones that really matter ) are followed, none of those things will happen.
FACT

If they do they are not accidents but negligence

Peace

Exactly, that's why we should consider restricting guns from people that haven't proven they are up to the privelege. Shit maybe I would fail based on my use of "high powered" lol.

 

[Cold$moke]

I did all those things, still shoot. Don't see the need for an AR15, but I have friends and family that own them. Keep nit picking and dismissing based on irrelevant terminology though.

Nothing wrong with an ar 15
As its the people running them that make the decisions

 

[PCXV]

The point of gun education isn't to teach you how to kill someone with a gun. It's the complete opposite.

You've made it clear you've had no educational courses on guns with two comments. Good job.

Then what is the point of shooting a gun in self defense then? I'm pretty sure you are trying to hurt/kill whoever you are defending yourself from.

Edit: saw your late edit. I would shoot someone trying to kill me but some view killing as the worse thing a person could do and might not.

 

[Cold$moke]

Guns don't kill people behind them do

I carry for a ton of reasons least of which is a want to cause harm.

But the sword that takes life,is also the sword that saves it.

 

[Cold$moke]

Then what is the point of shooting a gun in self defense then? I'm pretty sure you are trying to hurt/kill whoever you are defending yourself from.

After its deemed necessary

And if it is deemed necessary the person your shooting at is generally better off dead

 

[LEDandCoffee]

Then what is the point of shooting a gun in self defense then? I'm pretty sure you are trying to hurt/kill whoever you are defending yourself from.

I'm speaking about a gun safety course. You're talking about... well I don't even know. A high-stress combat situation or something.

One would typically say the point of shooting a gun in self defense is to... defend yourself.

 

[Cold$moke]

Answer this


Whats the difference between a kid that shoots a school and a good productive child?

Whats the difference between a good productive adult and a murderer?

Whats yhe difference between a good productive person and one that commits suicide?

 

[Cold$moke]

I'm speaking about a gun safety course. You're talking about... well I don't even know. A high-stress combat situation or something.

One would typically say the point of shooting a gun in self defense is to... defend yourself.

Ha ha oh god is it that simple?

 

[NrthrnMichigan]

Ignorance and guns = Deadly

 

[PCXV]

After its deemed necessary

And if it is deemed necessary the person your shooting at is generally better off dead

OK so you are being trained to kill when necessary (nit picking?) But it also possible to use those learned skills to go on the offensive.

 

[LEDandCoffee]

OK so you are being trained to kill when necessary (nit picking?) But who is to many won't use those learned skills to go on the offensive?

You don't learn offensive skills in gun safety or permit to carry classes. This is what you're not gathering. They're not military boot camps.

You're told your rights & laws locally, and how to defend yourself properly. As well as how to properly handle a firearm without hurting yourself or another.

 

[PCXV]

I'm speaking about a gun safety course. You're talking about... well I don't even know. A high-stress combat situation or something.

One would typically say the point of shooting a gun in self defense is to... defend yourself.

The skills it takes to defend yourself are tranferrable to offense and in both cases the main purpose is to hurt/kill with a gun.

I thought we were talking about more extensive gun training. The hunter safety course I took didn't teach us too much about shooting.

 

[LEDandCoffee]

The skills it takes to defend yourself are tranferrable to offense and in both cases the main purpose is to hurt/kill with a gun.

I thought we were talking about more extensive gun training. The hunter safety course I took didn't teach us too much about shooting.

I can tell.. you're clearly not too educated on the subject.

 

[Cold$moke]

OK so you are being trained to kill when necessary (nit picking?) But it also possible to use those learned skills to go on the offensive.

Not likely cause when you are trained you generally have a better understanding of the consequences.

I would only shoot if t heee was life in danger as the legal headache would be a pain