I guess I hit a little close to home then, since if it didn't why would you feel the need to reply?
Why don't you cite your "scientific research" and educate me, or do you think just because it dribbled from your maw it needs no supporting evidence?
My observation only relied on history and I'll put the record of that up against any claim of scientific
theory that shows no basis in fact (due to the claimant's inability to cite the source of that "science") since those that are either ignorant or unable to grasp the importance of history are doomed to make those same historical mistakes while claiming they are doing the exact opposite.