dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
What are you on about now?now you're getting somewhere. we're you forced to conduct Buisness all year with paper currency or to file a tax return?
you are admitting that contracts bind us to these things.
What are you on about now?now you're getting somewhere. we're you forced to conduct Buisness all year with paper currency or to file a tax return?
you are admitting that contracts bind us to these things.
on about a 2g og moonrock.What are you on about now?
you would have followed the law, don't lie homey.LOL! Dolt.
I certainly hope I would have helped the slave escape, Jan. I would have done so knowing full well what the ramifications could be legally. Good gawd -- can you really think in such black & white terms? I know it's simpler that way, but you miss a whole fucking lot, you simple-minded shithead.
are you that stupid and ignorant not to understand the the parties have switched platforms. If I asked what years did this happened you would probably not have an answer due to stupidity. Another lie you have told is about MLK being a Republican....he was notyou would have followed the law, don't lie homey.
fun fact: in the year before the civil war not one single Republican owned a slave.
slave.
I don't recall ever saying king was a Republican. he was a socialist or communist.are you that stupid and ignorant not to understand the the parties have switched platforms. If I asked what years did this happened you would probably not have an answer due to stupidity. Another lie you have told is about MLK being a Republican....he was not
Martin Luther King Jr. was not a Republican. Or a Democrat.
King was not a partisan and never endorsed any political candidate. In a 1958 interview, King said “I don’t think the Republican party is a party full of the almighty God nor is the Democratic party. They both have weaknesses … And I’m not inextricably bound to either party.”
King did, however, weigh in on the Republican party during his lifetime. In Chapter 23 of his autobiography, King writes this about the 1964 Republican National Convention:
The Republican Party geared its appeal and program to racism, reaction, and extremism. All people of goodwill viewed with alarm and concern the frenzied wedding at the Cow Palace of the KKK with the radical right. The “best man” at this ceremony was a senator whose voting record, philosophy, and program were anathema to all the hard-won achievements of the past decade.
Senator Goldwater had neither the concern nor the comprehension necessary to grapple with this problem of poverty in the fashion that the historical moment dictated. On the urgent issue of civil rights, Senator Goldwater represented a philosophy that was morally indefensible and socially suicidal. While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. His candidacy and philosophy would serve as an umbrella under which extremists of all stripes would stand. In the light of these facts and because of my love for America, I had no alternative but to urge every Negro and white person of goodwill to vote against Mr. Goldwater and to withdraw support from any Republican candidate that did not publicly disassociate himself from Senator Goldwater and his philosophy.
https://thinkprogress.org/no-martin-luther-king-jr-was-not-a-republican-but-heres-what-he-had-to-say-about-them-9c29475ef37/
Neither you nor I can say for sure, cupcake.you would have followed the law, don't lie homey.
Can't expound on your own point, then? Got it. Let me know when the moldy weed is no longer impairing your reasoning ability (or whatever the fuck is going on with you) and we'll pick it back up then, k?on about a 2g og moonrock.
Yes. He really is.are you that stupid and ignorant not to understand the the parties have switched platforms.
you ignored a point then asked for expansion. you can pick it up a couple of posts ago with the contract I mentioned when you correctly pointed out that opening a Buisness to the public is voluntary.Can't expound on your own point, then? Got it. Let me know when the moldy weed is no longer impairing your reasoning ability (or whatever the fuck is going on with you) and we'll pick it back up then, k?
My lord you are stupid.I don't recall ever saying king was a Republican. he was a socialist or communist.
I have addressed your parties switched sides myth many times......of the Democratic legislation that switched sides you can't even come up with two names so it's just a stupid position to hold.
especially given the fact the black vote switched to Democrat in the 1930s with fdr...3 decades before civil rights.....and the white vote in the south went Republican in the 80s.....2 decades after.
your theory is hinged on legislators switching sides to which you can name none......and the popular vote switching 5 decades apart......yet civil rights is the common denominator supposedly.
doesn't add up unless you count your feels duder.
Surrender noted and accepted. You're dismissed, dumdum.you ignored a point then asked for expansion. you can pick it up a couple of posts ago with the contract I mentioned when you correctly pointed out that opening a Buisness to the public is voluntary.
can you identify the contract or even swallow your arrogance enough to admit that a contract must exist to bind one to statutes?
I suspect not, sugarplumb.
it's nice to see you in here supporting your pedo friend rob who also hates civil rights.sure, that's why he's bunk. I would add this is quite older than the orange ones presidency, can you concede that at least?
it's not like bunk just started this last year...and it's older than his marriage as well.
rob roy opposes simple civil rights but wants us to think that he would be opposed to black slavery.LOL! Dolt.
I certainly hope I would have helped the slave escape, Jan. I would have done so knowing full well what the ramifications could be legally. Good gawd -- can you really think in such black & white terms? I know it's simpler that way, but you miss a whole fucking lot, you simple-minded shithead.
and to your lie about MLK. You did say he was a Republican you lying POS.I don't recall ever saying king was a Republican. he was a socialist or communist.
I have addressed your parties switched sides myth many times......of the Democratic legislation that switched sides you can't even come up with two names so it's just a stupid position to hold.
especially given the fact the black vote switched to Democrat in the 1930s with fdr...3 decades before civil rights.....and the white vote in the south went Republican in the 80s.....2 decades after.
your theory is hinged on legislators switching sides to which you can name none......and the popular vote switching 5 decades apart......yet civil rights is the common denominator supposedly.
doesn't add up unless you count your feels duder.
now STFU. He was not a Repuke you lying shitSeriously, where do you learn this racist shit like "white knighting" if not from your own admission of surrounding yourself with racial rhetoric. So Rob Roy is white and that is a fact? I would think the internet would be a great place for the great Republican MLK to see content of character judged as you can't really see what color everyone is.......obviously you see a lot of color still. Keep that shit in the Democratic party though please.
the state you come from was 50% slaves.you would have followed the law, don't lie homey.
fun fact: in the year before the civil war not one single Republican owned a slave.
slave.
you've denied it, but that's only because you are a history reviser like so many other hate-filled scumbags with racist agendas.I have addressed your parties switched sides myth many times......
what a long list! blitch left office before 64 and archer started office after 64 as a dem.My lord you are stupid.
I tell you what Google "mass exodus of Dixiecrat from the Democratic party".
I guess you don't know about Strom Thurmond, Albert Watson, Marshall Parker. William Reynolds Archer Jr , Iris Blitch, just to name a few, have switch parties during this time period. You said name two. I can give you even more than I have already named. Are you really this ignorant about history ? I pray your child is not as stupid as her father.
'.
so it was about civil rights and you post a map of just before........and 5 decades after.you've denied it, but that's only because you are a history reviser like so many other hate-filled scumbags with racist agendas.
senate composition in 1960:
entirely democratic south.
senate composition now:
entirely republican south.
you are a fucking idiot nazi if i've ever seen one.
i've heard stories of things lost in those ball pits..yuck!I see you avoided explaining why you would force a black person to serve a white person, even if the black person preferred to be left alone. Are you saying that could never happen under "civil rights" ?
Bag of shit!!??
OMG you cannot be this stupid. The list is longer you only asked for two.what a long list! blitch left office before 64 and archer started office after 64 as a dem.