Mark Blyth, the economist who's making sense

Status
Not open for further replies.

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I agree that Padashystikk aren't overtly racist and don't fit the definition of racism in that they don't seem to believe in the superiority of white people over black or brown people. Supporting the status quo of systemic racism by telling people to stop talking about it, I find to crosses the line. Supporting the concept of "kicking social justice warriors to the curb", I find crosses the line. Repeatedly posting deliberately racist and bigoted remarks I find crosses the line. They aren't overtly racist but they lean towards racism in important areas. That's just me, though. I agree that they aren't overt racists and as with Sanders, I can find areas where we have common ground and can agree with them. I can support Sanders although I see areas where he supports the racist status quo in this country.

We have a white supremacist president and growing white supremacist fascist paramilitary that are clearly and overtly racist. I believe Padashystikk also oppose them, they just have strange ideas about how to do so.
Now that you mention it, there was a very blatant racist who posted in the subforum recently with an offensive racial remark and I responded to him with a simple fuck you. Shytstikk seemed to think that my comment was equal to his in merit and offensiveness.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
i swear i have heard this euphemism before, but where?

Nice attempt at a smear, but more news outlets are better for Democracy, as proven throughout history.

But you don't really care about democracy; you only care that your establishment shills win. If you're fighting against the truth you're on the wrong team, Buck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top