ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
This bitch promised him everything and he didn't give a fuck because it was all bullshit. So he left her.
Trump's gonna smash the golden calf
- Thread starter ArcticGranite
- Start date
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Remember when? What are you Chris Farley? I'll go with it.
Remember when two time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's administration took steps to repeal Obama's Clean Power Plan?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/10/09/climate/clean-power-plan.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
failed?
she got more votes both times.
people wanted hillary far more than trump. he cheated his way in and is not a legitimate president.
also, you are literally nazi cancer, your wife left you and your dick doesn't work.
now go pick up your disability check, bitch.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Saw this where I was picking up my disability check, umm, I mean working today. Thought of you
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Thank you for sharing your fantasy.Saw this where I was picking up my disability check, umm, I mean working today. Thought of you
View attachment 4024254
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
Somehow I knew you worked under a bridgeSaw this where I was picking up my disability check, umm, I mean working today. Thought of you
View attachment 4024254
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
A troll bridge no less!
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Today a large group of some sixty-five top scientists sent a letter to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt demanding that he initiate a process to reconsider the so-called Endangerment Findingof 2009.
Regular readers of this blog will recognize the EF as one of the most egregious and preposterous bureaucratic power grabs of all time. By the EF, EPA purported to "determine" that carbon dioxide -- a colorless, odorless gas that has no known adverse health effects at any concentration you will ever experience and that is the basis for all life on earth -- is a "danger" to human health and welfare. The so-called science underlying the EF is and always was a joke. See, for example my post "The 'Science' Underlying Climate Alarmism Turns Up Missing" from September 2016 (and multiple similar posts). Nevertheless, the EF was used by the Obama administration as the basis for, among other things, its Clean Power Plan, seeking to force the closure of all coal-fired power plants (and ultimately the closure of all power plants involving any fossil fuel). Just today, a group of about seventeen "blue" states and their environmentalist co-parties filed a brief in the D.C. Circuit (behind pay wall) seeking to compel the Trump administration to reinstate the CPP or something like it, on the grounds that the EF requires the government to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide.
http://manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2017/10/17/sixty-scientists-demand-reconsideration-of-epas-endangerment-finding
Regular readers of this blog will recognize the EF as one of the most egregious and preposterous bureaucratic power grabs of all time. By the EF, EPA purported to "determine" that carbon dioxide -- a colorless, odorless gas that has no known adverse health effects at any concentration you will ever experience and that is the basis for all life on earth -- is a "danger" to human health and welfare. The so-called science underlying the EF is and always was a joke. See, for example my post "The 'Science' Underlying Climate Alarmism Turns Up Missing" from September 2016 (and multiple similar posts). Nevertheless, the EF was used by the Obama administration as the basis for, among other things, its Clean Power Plan, seeking to force the closure of all coal-fired power plants (and ultimately the closure of all power plants involving any fossil fuel). Just today, a group of about seventeen "blue" states and their environmentalist co-parties filed a brief in the D.C. Circuit (behind pay wall) seeking to compel the Trump administration to reinstate the CPP or something like it, on the grounds that the EF requires the government to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide.
http://manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2017/10/17/sixty-scientists-demand-reconsideration-of-epas-endangerment-finding
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you just gave me depression. the thought of people regularly reading a blog so shitty is way too depressing to take.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Imagine how depressed the scientists are! The three lines of evidence in the EF have been conclusively proven invalid.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
according to a blog. congrats you fucking nazi idiot.
now talk about how you want to ban certain religions from holding public office like hitler did.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Being an idiot is your first and natural default!
ORAL ARGUMENTS JUNE 2, 2016
No. 15-1363 (Lead) and Consolidated Cases (Complex)
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, ET AL.,
Petitioners,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND REGINA A. MCCARTHY ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Respondents.
"The Endangerment Finding in turn lays out each of the scientific bases upon which EPA relied in reaching its conclusions. At 74 Fed. Reg. 66518:3, EPA states that “attribution of observed climate change to anthropogenic activities is based on multiple lines of evidence.” EPA then describes the three (and only three) lines of evidence supporting its conclusion that the evidence is “compelling that elevated concentrations of heat-trapping greenhouses gases are the root cause of recently observed climate change.” 74 Fed.Reg. at 66518:1. Adopting for these purposes EPA’s “lines of evidence” terminology, each of the three has been definitively invalidated by real world empirical temperature data."
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yep, there are only three lines of evidence that to support manmade global warming.
now let's talk some more about how you share the exact same belief as KKK grand wizard david duke and call it a hoax.
maybe that will be easier than talking about how you want to ban a religion from holding public office, same as hitler.
wierd how you have these exact same beliefs as such horrible people, eh?
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Do you even know what supports the EF and how it got knocked apart?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no one cares about your pathetic blog, nazi boi.
what we all wanna know is if you coped KKK grand wizard david duke's conspiracy theory or if you just arrived at the same conspiracy as him on your own.
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
Anyway, it's getting knocked apart faster than a house of cards. Which it is.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
then it should be easy for you to show us a whole bunch of peer reviewed studies proving manmade global warming is false.
also, why do you have the same conspiracy theory as KKK grand wizard david duke?
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
In our very recent past, before CO2 was an issue, temperatures swung wildly and oceans rose hundreds of feet. It was natural. It's not surprising to me that the EF's becoming undone.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
those changes happened over thousands of years, idiot. we just undid 5,000+ years of cooling in less than 100.
you're a fucking idiot.
why do you have the same conspiracy theory as KKK grand wizard david duke?
ArcticGranite
Well-Known Member
That uniformitarian dogma is dying as mounting new evidence piles up. A 10C rise in decades and MWP 1 and 2 are being shown to be very rapid events.