Climate change, models were wrong

[ArcticGranite]

Models don't match observations. They are too "hot". None are accurate.

A recent study published in Nature Geoscience.

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo3031.html?foxtrotcallback=true

Links to pertinent articles.

http://mailchi.mp/thegwpf.org/we-were-wrong-climate-scientists-concede-170317?e=f4e33fdd1e

 

[SneekyNinja]

Models don't match observations. They are too "hot". None are accurate.

A recent study published in Nature Geoscience.

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo3031.html?foxtrotcallback=true

Links to pertinent articles.

http://mailchi.mp/thegwpf.org/we-were-wrong-climate-scientists-concede-170317?e=f4e33fdd1e

Are you honestly retarded?

The first link concludes that limiting the temperature rise to 1.5°C probably isn't possible and it'll run ahead of that.

And the second link you couldn't pay me to click.

 

[ArcticGranite]

You likely haven't ponied up $175 to have full access to the report. You've simply read the preview. Conclusions aren't made from it.

 

[SneekyNinja]

You likely haven't ponied up $175 to have full access to the report. You've simply read the preview. Conclusions aren't made from it.

It's called the abstract, Jesus man, learn to "science".

The abstract is essentially the Tl;Dr version.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Darwin's theory of evolution has been proven wrong, therefore the earth is only 4000 years old and man was created as we are now.

Right?

 

[ArcticGranite]

Michael Grubb, professor of international energy and climate change at University College London and one of the study’s authors, admitted that his previous prediction had been wrong.

He stated during the climate summit in Paris in December 2015: “All the evidence from the past 15 years leads me to conclude that actually delivering 1.5C is simply incompatible with democracy.”

Speaking to The Times, he said: “When the facts change, I change my mind, as Keynes said.

Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at the University of Oxford and another author of the paper, said: “We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models. We haven’t seen that in the observations.”

 

[Bugeye]

Models don't match observations. They are too "hot". None are accurate.

A recent study published in Nature Geoscience.

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo3031.html?foxtrotcallback=true

Links to pertinent articles.

http://mailchi.mp/thegwpf.org/we-were-wrong-climate-scientists-concede-170317?e=f4e33fdd1e

I am SHOCKED! Perhaps recent temps just haven't been adjusted upward enough? Or maybe older temps have not been adjusted downward enough?

 

[SneekyNinja]

Michael Grubb, professor of international energy and climate change at University College London and one of the study’s authors, admitted that his previous prediction had been wrong.

He stated during the climate summit in Paris in December 2015: “All the evidence from the past 15 years leads me to conclude that actually delivering 1.5C is simply incompatible with democracy.”

Speaking to The Times, he said: “When the facts change, I change my mind, as Keynes said.

Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at the University of Oxford and another author of the paper, said: “We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models. We haven’t seen that in the observations.”

You're still not seeing it... you're so painfully dumb.

This is why there's virtually no science supporting the shit the right wing says because you're even trying to misrepresent a scientific paper.

6 of the last 7 years have set records, nah, no warming at all... *sigh*

 

[ArcticGranite]

You're still not seeing it... you're so painfully dumb.

This is why there's virtually no science supporting the shit the right wing says because you're even trying to misrepresent a scientific paper.

6 of the last 7 years have set records, nah, no warming at all... *sigh*

You are reluctant to accept the models were wrong and the scientists concede that.

 

[SneekyNinja]

You are reluctant to accept the models were wrong and the scientists concede that.

You're reluctant to accept that when models don't match quantative data they are modified to account for the new variable.

Climate science isn't an exact science (but is based on "hard" science) and unexpected variables are to be expected.

What can be conclusively determined is that there is a warming trend that overall matches the models... expecting predictions for exact temperature increases on exact years and then claiming its all wrong when it's not pin point accurate is absurd.

 

[UncleBuck]

nazi OP is right, the models were wrong.

climate change turned out to be much worse than predicted.

or maybe he is talkng about his fellow climate change denying retard buddies.

in any case, nazi OP should stick to doing what he does best: posting ultra-racialized depictions of jews wearing the hitler star of david then feigning outrage when he is called a nazi.

also, nazi OP's dick does not work, at all.

here is to hoping for recurrence of the cancer which made his dick not work in the first place.

 

[SneekyNinja]

nazi OP is right, the models were wrong.

climate change turned out to be much worse than predicted.

or maybe he is talkng about his fellow climate change denying retard buddies.

in any case, nazi OP should stick to doing what he does best: posting ultra-racialized depictions of jews wearing the hitler star of david then feigning outrage when he is called a nazi.

also, nazi OP's dick does not work, at all.

here is to hoping for recurrence of the cancer which made his dick not work in the first place.

With no working dick, what's the point in continuing...?

 

[PCXV]

Dumbass tries to pretend Democrat KKK members in 1924 were far-left, ultra liberal SJWs. I doubt he understands basic science.

 

[ArcticGranite]

 

[Abiqua]

Darwin's theory of evolution has been proven wrong, therefore the earth is only 4000 years old and man was created as we are now.

Right?

Interesting the way you phrase that. Darwin certainly wasnt the 1st to promote the Theory of Evolution, just his version of it, observed in Galapagos rightly so, but I wonder if the time period of his observatons were of consequence with the birds and the beaks........I could point out a few things, but I will let the links do it...in short we still don't know, but it fascinates us......nor does it disprove evolution, by the contrary it strengthens it and makes Darwin out for what he probably was......


Do these fossil footprints challenge established theories of human evolution?
Fri, Sep 01, 2017
http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/fall-2017/article/do-these-fossil-footprints-challenge-established-theories-of-human-evolution

Scientists find 7.2-million-year-old pre-human remains in the Balkans
May 22, 2017
https://phys.org/news/2017-05-scientists-million-year-old-pre-human-balkans.html

 

[PCXV]

View attachment 4016032

Only convincing to know-nothing idiots like yourself.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Interesting the way you phrase that. Darwin certainly wasnt the 1st to promote the Theory of Evolution, just his version of it, observed in Galapagos rightly so, but I wonder if the time period of his observatons were of consequence with the birds and the beaks........I could point out a few things, but I will let the links do it...in short we still don't know, but it fascinates us......nor does it disprove evolution, by the contrary it strengthens it and makes Darwin out for what he probably was......


Do these fossil footprints challenge established theories of human evolution?
Fri, Sep 01, 2017
http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/fall-2017/article/do-these-fossil-footprints-challenge-established-theories-of-human-evolution

Scientists find 7.2-million-year-old pre-human remains in the Balkans
May 22, 2017
https://phys.org/news/2017-05-scientists-million-year-old-pre-human-balkans.html

Yeah, I know. Even though his actual theory is incorrect, no reasonable person denies evolution.

 

[UncleBuck]

View attachment 4016032

cool meme.

but you're still a nazi, and a conspiracy theorist retard.

and your dick doesn't work.

 

[Abiqua]

Darwin's theory of evolution has been proven wrong, therefore the earth is only 4000 years old and man was created as we are now.

Right?

Yeah, I know. Even though his actual theory is incorrect, no reasonable person denies evolution.

Huh?

But why, why is it incorrect? and have you read about either fossil? Both older than the Tanzania species and now add it to the Georgian fossils, found outside Africa, pre 1.8 million......no reasonable person denies it, correct, however, people are notoriously and stupidly wrong for all the right reasons........

 

[Abiqua]

cool meme.

but you're still a nazi, and a conspiracy theorist retard.

and your dick doesn't work.

and Santa Claus won't visit either.........fucking racist reindeer slave driver