This was day 40.
View attachment 3980745
It is too hard to do anything in the tent, I will be pulling them out of the tent, like they are in the picture and working on them on Friday. I did do some pruning at day 40 and then did some relocating and redistribution of buds.
I know I have to do a lot more on Friday.
So, when do you harvest? And at how many days will they be when you harvest.
GR
Sorry, did not answer your questions, had to distract! Harvest will be somewhere in a week. Drying will be fast, very hot for me, bad, I know!))) It is necessary to treat for 2 months in the refrigerator, so that the cones get strength, otherwise they are not so saturated and smoke badly. I'll show when I cut the bushes, cut off the leaves and dry .. all ahead !! Thank you, Вro, for participation!This was day 40.
View attachment 3980745
So, when do you harvest? And at how many days will they be when you harvest.
GR
Nothing wrong with his light or spectrum.1. The spectrum of light is wrong, not power, but the spectrum!
2. You gave a lot of vegs, Tops down slightly lower, if the branch breaks, nothing terrible.
3. At the stage of vega, the plants need to be pressed down with powerful and spectrally correct illumination, then they will be squat and dense.
4. Look where the gaps, there are branches to direct, if they break, do not be scared!
5. The main thing
Buy lamps are normal, next time you will grow the Chernobyl catastrophe, I guarantee you, even without changing anything anymore, I will show how. Bro, believe me!
I would gladly accept your version, if you did not ask me why so dense the flowers grow in my garden. I look at your photos and your colleagues, I see the same picture, and I see another output))) Bro, why not try to change the light, and in a few months will return to our conversation.)) It's as simple as buying Those lamps that I spoke. Colleague, I say this not with empty words, every day I communicate with gardeners, every day I am asked certain questions, I help people, but this I have not seen, Bro, never to more than 1000 watts, and plants .. I do not believe in this!. Or a strong leakage of light .. the other I do not see (bad genetics I ruled out a priori) ..Nothing wrong with his light or spectrum.
My plants got better when I switched to the light he's using. When you try it, you'll see it too.I would gladly accept your version, if you did not ask me why so dense the flowers grow in my garden. I look at your photos and your colleagues, I see the same picture, and I see another output))) Bro, why not try to change the light, and in a few months will return to our conversation.)) It's as simple as buying Those lamps that I spoke. Colleague, I say this not with empty words, every day I communicate with gardeners, every day I am asked certain questions, I help people, but this I have not seen, Bro, never to more than 1000 watts, and plants .. I do not believe in this!. Or a strong leakage of light .. the other I do not see (bad genetics I ruled out a priori) ..
Plants are absolutely healthy !!
Here, look, it's 1000 watts with a normal spectrum:
View attachment 3980999
..
I do not know, Bro, what light our colleague uses (It is still difficult for me to understand not the European brands and the English language, sorry!), but I see that the plants develop very poorly. If there was a problem in the diet, the leaves would be the color of the rainbow)), but in him, I repeat, the plants are in good flowering flowery and lush (but in low light it should be, just the flowers at the end are not dense, like fluff). And most importantly, the branches stretch for some reason more up, I have no such..... 1000+ !! I do not want to and I'm not going to argue with Bros, just explain the reason to me please ?.My plants got better when I switched to the light he's using. When you try it, you'll see it too.
I think you have a difference in technique.I do not know, Bro, what light our colleague uses (It is still difficult for me to understand not the European brands and the English language, sorry!), but I see that the plants develop very poorly. If there was a problem in the diet, the leaves would be the color of the rainbow)), but in him, I repeat, the plants are in good flowering flowery and lush (but in low light it should be, just the flowers at the end are not dense, like fluff). And most importantly, the branches stretch for some reason more up, I have no such..... 1000+ !! I do not want to and I'm not going to argue with Bros, just explain the reason to me please ?.
I do not know for sure about the light as this is the first run like this for me. I do know I ran a 400 W vert and it sucked. This light is so much brighter but sorry don't know the spectrum.I do not know, Bro, what light our colleague uses (It is still difficult for me to understand not the European brands and the English language, sorry!), but I see that the plants develop very poorly. If there was a problem in the diet, the leaves would be the color of the rainbow)), but in him, I repeat, the plants are in good flowering flowery and lush (but in low light it should be, just the flowers at the end are not dense, like fluff). And most importantly, the branches stretch for some reason more up, I have no such..... 1000+ !! I do not want to and I'm not going to argue with Bros, just explain the reason to me please ?.
That's not understand, and everything, Bros))). If I did not tell you, tie up the branches and trim the leaves is solely my wife. I just make sure that the plant was healthy and properly fed and properly illuminated. I did not even tell her technique, I just said the basic concept, like you-she does everything herself-it's not at all difficult.I think you have a difference in technique.
I think we have a language barrier.
.
Welcome, Bro! But at the expense of light or not light, we will understand, do not worry!I do not know for sure about the light as this is the first run like this for me. I do know I ran a 400 W vert and it sucked. This light is so much brighter but sorry don't know the spectrum.
Let's see how it goes! I ain't getting my britches in a bind over it, too damn old for that. It, I know for sure will be my best yield yet.
My plants are at 40 days in that photo, so let's see what the other 30 plus days hold in store.
TTystikk knows his lights, he help me make the swap. I do know that I do not have the space for a 1000W do to heat problems, so far no problems here.
Sedan, thanks dude for your info, you are a big help and inspiration. I will continue to try and fill the spaces.
Peace,
GR
Look up 315W CMH. The 3100K is best for flowering.That's not understand, and everything, Bros))). If I did not tell you, tie up the branches and trim the leaves is solely my wife. I just make sure that the plant was healthy and properly fed and properly illuminated. I did not even tell her technique, I just said the basic concept, like you-she does everything herself-it's not at all difficult.
Once again:
this is the work of my student and girlfriend (as a friend, not a girl !!), she lives in Surgut.
June 6, summer .. not Australia))
From her to me, as well as from me to America.
Her topic is called "Carousels from Sedan")))).
View attachment 3981203
Box: Width 70 cm, depth 40 cm, height 160 cm. Light sodium 400 watts.
(She did everything herself, she is divorced)
View attachment 3981199 View attachment 3981200 View attachment 3981201 View attachment 3981202
Bro, can you link me again to give this lamp, тhat there is a spectral diagram, I will compare it with my?
I will understand. If necessary, I'll buy it.
Welcome, Bro! But at the expense of light or not light, we will understand, do not worry!
Thanks, Bro!Look up 315W CMH. The 3100K is best for flowering.
Be sure the unit you get has a low frequency square wave ballast, this is the essential component for improved efficiency.
Look up 315W CMH. The 3100K is best for flowering.
Be sure the unit you get has a low frequency square wave ballast, this is the essential component for improved efficiency.