Personally had 0 problem with that fights decision
First Bradley fight was a worse decision IMO, it was fitting to have him there in the booth next to the two biggest Pacquiao fanbois on the planet.
Manny didn't look active and what he was hitting Horn with didn't look to be hurting him. Horn had good movement until he was knocked down by that headbutt they called a push. Manny had one good round in that fight the 9th where he landed most his punches. The rest of the rounds were close-ish, with Horn dictating the pace and where the fight took place. He was walking Manny down all night. He wasn't as accurate, but it appeared he threw more. Compubox disagrees but I don't think it's been accurate for about 20 years.
I plan on watching that fight back as I missed the first two rounds.
Did you see the stats though? To me the stats came at no surprise but the decision didn't reflect the stats at all
Not one judge scored with numbers that reflected the stats, which in a case that the fight goes the distance, should be the determining factor in deciding the winner. Some of those scores were ridiculous 117-111!?
The fight was fun to watch with lots of excitement. I'll watch the rematch and cannot wait for Horn to fight someone his own age in his own class, Crawford? (He'll get tore up imo)
I gave the first and last round to the Aussie and he won some in the middle but no way he deserved that decision.