Why do some have problems with people of different color

Why do some hate based on color of skin

  • fear of the unknown

    Votes: 22 48.9%
  • Jealousy

    Votes: 7 15.6%
  • taught

    Votes: 23 51.1%
  • confusion

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • small penis

    Votes: 25 55.6%

  • Total voters
    45
No, I would say the imbecile that established a public business and then was bitter about following the rules governing such entities is the asshole.


So, you are a prohibitionist and believe that people do not or should not own themselves and have control over their own property but not the property of others?

I feel sorry for you, always trying to run others lives for them. Can you tell me where you get the right to run somebody else life from?
 
So is the pedophile that justifies their actions.


Your desperate need to talk about pedo stuff has been noted. Can you just sit there and masturbate quietly for a bit, I'll get to you right after I demolish the Prohibitionist Dagwood. Thanks for your patience.
 
So, you are a prohibitionist and believe that people do not or should not own themselves and have control over their own property but not the property of others?

I feel sorry for you, always trying to run others lives for them. Can you tell me where you get the right to run somebody else life from?


Simple, when they are pedophiles like you, we use our justice system to protect each other.
 
Simple, when they are pedophiles like you, we use our justice system to protect each other.


If you repeat something false often enough can you somehow make it true?


Would you say justice requires an adherence to live and let live principles or would you say it's more about being obedient to others ideals?
 
Or bullets, sometimes.


Your approach is interesting.

So, if you were standing in a place where the age of consent is statutorily say 17, but you could see across the imaginary border state line and you witnessed a person doing a 16 year old which was legal in that state, what would you do?
 
If you repeat something false often enough can you somehow make it true?


Would you say justice requires an adherence to live and let live principles or would you say it's more about being obedient to others ideals?


I would say, justice is you getting some help. As much as it would serve your abusive nature, I'm not going to change my view on non-intervention, chester.
 
I would say, justice is you getting some help. As much as it would serve your abusive nature, I'm not going to change my view on non-intervention, chester.


So we agree that a person or group of people who assume the consent of others who don't or can't actually consent need to cease that behavior ? That they are being dangerous?

If so, why do you continue to worship government ? As it's entire business model is based in the idea that consent of the individual isn't needed.



Cognitive dissonance much ?
 
So we agree that a person or group of people who assume the consent of others who don't or can't actually consent need to cease that behavior ? That they are being dangerous?

If so, why do you continue to worship government ? As it's entire business model is based in the idea that consent of the individual isn't needed.



Cognitive dissonance much ?

Get help, pedophile.
 
Your approach is interesting.

So, if you were standing in a place where the age of consent is statutorily say 17, but you could see across the imaginary border state line and you witnessed a person doing a 16 year old which was legal in that state, what would you do?
No. Teenage chicks are immature as fuck, as I recall. They may know what they're doing in the moment, but they really have no clue what they're doing. Not only are they manipulation-prone, they have no understanding of the implications that not only sex and a baby, but a manipulative person can have on their life and growing process. They also bitch too much and still retain that narcissism that comes with youth, making them incapable of truly loving someone.

So, summarily, fuck no. They're too immature.
 
No. Teenage chicks are immature as fuck, as I recall. They may know what they're doing in the moment, but they really have no clue what they're doing. Not only are they manipulation-prone, they have no understanding of the implications that not only sex and a baby, but a manipulative person can have on their life and growing process. They also bitch too much and still retain that narcissism that comes with youth, making them incapable of truly loving someone.

So, summarily, fuck no. They're too immature.



I was cautioning you on creating a statutory justification regarding shooting people . You gave me your opinion on banging teen agers.


Hey look....a squirrel!
 
I was cautioning you on creating a statutory justification regarding shooting people . You gave me your opinion on banging teen agers.


Hey look....a squirrel!
Statutory justification for shooting people: If you touch an underage kid, I'll put two in your chest and one in your face.

It's not about the law, it's about what's right. Don't manipulate children. It can seriously fuck with their psychology, which is reprehensible.
 
Last edited:
@Rob Roy wants to talk about consensual interaction, then he wants to advocate sex with a person unable to give consent due to lack of maturity and understanding, especially when that sexual interaction is the result of manipulation.

He likes to pick and choose what constitutes consent and when it's appropriate, apparently. Pedophile and segregationist.
 
So, you are a prohibitionist and believe that people do not or should not own themselves and have control over their own property but not the property of others?

I feel sorry for you, always trying to run others lives for them. Can you tell me where you get the right to run somebody else life from?

Public property IS NOT AN OXYMORON, you unmitigated jackass.
 
Statutory justification for shooting people: If you touch an underage kid, I'll put two in your chest and one in your face.

It's not about the law, it's about what's right. Don't manipulate children. It can seriously fuck with their psychology, which is reprehensible.


@Rob Roy wants to talk about consensual interaction, then he wants to advocate sex with a person unable to give consent due to lack of maturity and understanding, especially when that sexual interaction is the result of manipulation.

He likes to pick and choose what constitutes consent and when it's appropriate, apparently. Pedophile and segregationist.



You seem to have worked yourself into quite a frenzy. Might I suggest a cold shower and then we begin again without your conflating and baseless allegations?
 
Back
Top