Why do Republicans hate Iran but love Saudi Arabia?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Actually Russia saved Europe's ass. The rest of the shit you listed was just US imperialism.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
No cold war?! Da fuk?
The Korean conflict still hasn't been settled, dumb shit!
WTF were we doing in Vietnam, if not empire building?
Cuban missile crisis was provoked by American nuclear missiles placed in Turkey. They're still there.
And yes, LET'S GO ON; Iraq, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Israel, Pakistan, the list goes on and on and on...
World leading military power, sure. We did NOT create peace. We did NOT hold the bad people accountable. Indeed, we've recently let the NSA off the chain so they can spy on Americans (Echelon) and allowed the CIA to run psyops against Americans (paid Jeff Bezos $600 million to buy the Washington Post, to run propaganda campaigns on Americans).
Shall I continue, you dumb ignorant fucking defender of those who would misinform and enslave you?
Jesusfuck, you can't even keep your own screen name honest here, you do not need to try and sound intelligent about world affairs while spreading vicious lies!
If you must suck right wing cock, at least do it in private. No one needs to hear about it.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
I listed a few details above so people with an open mind can actually hear the truth.
ZaraBeth420
Well-Known Member
Name-calling is so liberalish. Sexual insults scream of someone who must artificially bolster the emotional impact of their post. But at least you provided some supporting data.
But mostly, your post was highly emotional and vitriolic.
Like I've said in earlier posts, liberals can't simply disagree - they must do so with vitriol.
My post was factually correct. The world had better be glad that we have been in the lead. We haven't been perfect; no world leader ever could be. But we have prevented WW3 many times over.
ZaraBeth420
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry, I don't get it. I'm just so high...
goldberg71b
Well-Known Member
WOW! Dem Lawmaker Walks Out of Town Hall Event After Crowd Starts Chanting “We Love Trump!” (VIDEO)
Jim Hoft Jun 6th, 2017 10:30 am 1367 Comments
Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-CA) held a raucous town hall event last week at Stephen M. White School in Carson, California.
The Democrat lawmaker ran from the venue after the pro-Trump crowd started chanting, “We love Trump!”
This was insane!
The pro-Trump crowd started screaming and chanting in the opening minutes of the town hall event.
That’s when Rep. Barragan cut from the event and walked out of the auditorium.
Barragan is in her first term.
It looks like it might be her last term.
Jim Hoft Jun 6th, 2017 10:30 am 1367 Comments
Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-CA) held a raucous town hall event last week at Stephen M. White School in Carson, California.
The Democrat lawmaker ran from the venue after the pro-Trump crowd started chanting, “We love Trump!”
This was insane!
The pro-Trump crowd started screaming and chanting in the opening minutes of the town hall event.
That’s when Rep. Barragan cut from the event and walked out of the auditorium.
Barragan is in her first term.
It looks like it might be her last term.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
"little marco"
"lyin' ted"
"crooked hillary"
"low energy jeb"
"droopy eyes chuck todd"
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
No, your post was wrong and radically uninformed.
You are stupid and no one should believe anything you say about world affairs.
goldberg71b
Well-Known Member
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen descendant of Pocahontas: Would be “sensitive topic” to tell Liz Warren
William A. Jacobson | 6/6/2017 - 2:30pm
The branding of Warren as the fake Indian is so complete, it comes up in unexpected places like CNN.
Elizabeth Warren has claimed at various points in her life to be Native American, most notably when she was climbing the law professor ladder. When she got tenure at Harvard Law School, she dropped the self-identification.
By all available evidence, Warren’s claims are false.
Warren never has come forward with any credible evidence, and Cherokee genealogists who have followed her family lines have proven there is no Indian ancestry (neither Cherokee nor Delaware).
Even if Warren had Native American ancestry, Warren would not meet the definition of Native American used by the EEOC and employers such as Harvard, because she has no ancestry and never had any “cultural identification” such as membership in a Native American tribe (both ancestry and cultural identification are needed).
Had Warren, when her Native American problem was discovered in 2012, simply fessed up to what she did, this probably wouldn’t be an issue anymore. Instead, Warren stood by her story, relying on convoluted (and mostly disprovable) “family lore” as a defense.
Being the “fake” Indian now is Elizabeth Warren’s brand, and nobody is branding her that way more aggressively than Donald Trump, as I wrote in late April 2017, Trump branding of Elizabeth Warren as Fake Indian continues, expecting her to run in 2020:
Trump doesn’t attack his political opponents, he brands them. The brand for Jeb was “low energy.” For Rubio, it was “little Marco.” For Cruz, it was “lyin’ Ted.” Once branded, they could not shake the image.
Just ask “Crooked Hillary.”
Which brings up Elizabeth Warren. As we posted earlier, while Warren is denying that she “is” running for president in 2020, she’s making all the normal pre-presidential run moves.
She’s raised her profile as the face of “the resistance,” a face Republicans also are jockeying to put out front.
Speaking at the NRA today, Trump warned that members should expect “Pocahontas” to run…
Trump is branding her. And being someone who was a fake Indian is her brand. She’ll never shake it.
The effectiveness of that branding was evident in a CNN interview with New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, who claims to be a direct descendant of Pocahontas and to have the family ancestry documented. Pocahontas allegedly was Shaheen’s 11th Great Grandmother.
CNN raise the Pocahontas ancestry with Shaheen, and then dropped the bomb, whether Shaheen had mentioned it to Elizabeth Warren:
Q. Have you told Elizabeth Warren?
A. Kind of a sensitive topic, so probably not.
It’s probably too late for Warren to put her Native American problem back in the bottle. But a complete and unreserved apology would be a good start.
Good luck if you're pinning your hopes on her or Hillary!
William A. Jacobson | 6/6/2017 - 2:30pm
The branding of Warren as the fake Indian is so complete, it comes up in unexpected places like CNN.
Elizabeth Warren has claimed at various points in her life to be Native American, most notably when she was climbing the law professor ladder. When she got tenure at Harvard Law School, she dropped the self-identification.
By all available evidence, Warren’s claims are false.
Warren never has come forward with any credible evidence, and Cherokee genealogists who have followed her family lines have proven there is no Indian ancestry (neither Cherokee nor Delaware).
Even if Warren had Native American ancestry, Warren would not meet the definition of Native American used by the EEOC and employers such as Harvard, because she has no ancestry and never had any “cultural identification” such as membership in a Native American tribe (both ancestry and cultural identification are needed).
Had Warren, when her Native American problem was discovered in 2012, simply fessed up to what she did, this probably wouldn’t be an issue anymore. Instead, Warren stood by her story, relying on convoluted (and mostly disprovable) “family lore” as a defense.
Being the “fake” Indian now is Elizabeth Warren’s brand, and nobody is branding her that way more aggressively than Donald Trump, as I wrote in late April 2017, Trump branding of Elizabeth Warren as Fake Indian continues, expecting her to run in 2020:
Trump doesn’t attack his political opponents, he brands them. The brand for Jeb was “low energy.” For Rubio, it was “little Marco.” For Cruz, it was “lyin’ Ted.” Once branded, they could not shake the image.
Just ask “Crooked Hillary.”
Which brings up Elizabeth Warren. As we posted earlier, while Warren is denying that she “is” running for president in 2020, she’s making all the normal pre-presidential run moves.
She’s raised her profile as the face of “the resistance,” a face Republicans also are jockeying to put out front.
Speaking at the NRA today, Trump warned that members should expect “Pocahontas” to run…
Trump is branding her. And being someone who was a fake Indian is her brand. She’ll never shake it.
The effectiveness of that branding was evident in a CNN interview with New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, who claims to be a direct descendant of Pocahontas and to have the family ancestry documented. Pocahontas allegedly was Shaheen’s 11th Great Grandmother.
CNN raise the Pocahontas ancestry with Shaheen, and then dropped the bomb, whether Shaheen had mentioned it to Elizabeth Warren:
Q. Have you told Elizabeth Warren?
A. Kind of a sensitive topic, so probably not.
It’s probably too late for Warren to put her Native American problem back in the bottle. But a complete and unreserved apology would be a good start.
Good luck if you're pinning your hopes on her or Hillary!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
congrats on the success of your racist smear!Sen. Jeanne Shaheen descendant of Pocahontas: Would be “sensitive topic” to tell Liz Warren
William A. Jacobson | 6/6/2017 - 2:30pm
The branding of Warren as the fake Indian is so complete, it comes up in unexpected places like CNN.
Elizabeth Warren has claimed at various points in her life to be Native American, most notably when she was climbing the law professor ladder. When she got tenure at Harvard Law School, she dropped the self-identification.
By all available evidence, Warren’s claims are false.
Warren never has come forward with any credible evidence, and Cherokee genealogists who have followed her family lines have proven there is no Indian ancestry (neither Cherokee nor Delaware).
Even if Warren had Native American ancestry, Warren would not meet the definition of Native American used by the EEOC and employers such as Harvard, because she has no ancestry and never had any “cultural identification” such as membership in a Native American tribe (both ancestry and cultural identification are needed).
Had Warren, when her Native American problem was discovered in 2012, simply fessed up to what she did, this probably wouldn’t be an issue anymore. Instead, Warren stood by her story, relying on convoluted (and mostly disprovable) “family lore” as a defense.
Being the “fake” Indian now is Elizabeth Warren’s brand, and nobody is branding her that way more aggressively than Donald Trump, as I wrote in late April 2017, Trump branding of Elizabeth Warren as Fake Indian continues, expecting her to run in 2020:
Trump doesn’t attack his political opponents, he brands them. The brand for Jeb was “low energy.” For Rubio, it was “little Marco.” For Cruz, it was “lyin’ Ted.” Once branded, they could not shake the image.
Just ask “Crooked Hillary.”
Which brings up Elizabeth Warren. As we posted earlier, while Warren is denying that she “is” running for president in 2020, she’s making all the normal pre-presidential run moves.
She’s raised her profile as the face of “the resistance,” a face Republicans also are jockeying to put out front.
Speaking at the NRA today, Trump warned that members should expect “Pocahontas” to run…
Trump is branding her. And being someone who was a fake Indian is her brand. She’ll never shake it.
The effectiveness of that branding was evident in a CNN interview with New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, who claims to be a direct descendant of Pocahontas and to have the family ancestry documented. Pocahontas allegedly was Shaheen’s 11th Great Grandmother.
CNN raise the Pocahontas ancestry with Shaheen, and then dropped the bomb, whether Shaheen had mentioned it to Elizabeth Warren:
Q. Have you told Elizabeth Warren?
A. Kind of a sensitive topic, so probably not.
It’s probably too late for Warren to put her Native American problem back in the bottle. But a complete and unreserved apology would be a good start.
Good luck if you're pinning your hopes on her or Hillary!
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
It's the orb.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Umm, exactly who would World War III have been with if we weren't one of the main combatants?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Astounding. Millions will be thrown off healthcare, resulting in millions of lives lost before their time and the best comeback you have is about questioning a senator's ancestry?Sen. Jeanne Shaheen descendant of Pocahontas: Would be “sensitive topic” to tell Liz Warren
William A. Jacobson | 6/6/2017 - 2:30pm
The branding of Warren as the fake Indian is so complete, it comes up in unexpected places like CNN.
Elizabeth Warren has claimed at various points in her life to be Native American, most notably when she was climbing the law professor ladder. When she got tenure at Harvard Law School, she dropped the self-identification.
By all available evidence, Warren’s claims are false.
Warren never has come forward with any credible evidence, and Cherokee genealogists who have followed her family lines have proven there is no Indian ancestry (neither Cherokee nor Delaware).
Even if Warren had Native American ancestry, Warren would not meet the definition of Native American used by the EEOC and employers such as Harvard, because she has no ancestry and never had any “cultural identification” such as membership in a Native American tribe (both ancestry and cultural identification are needed).
Had Warren, when her Native American problem was discovered in 2012, simply fessed up to what she did, this probably wouldn’t be an issue anymore. Instead, Warren stood by her story, relying on convoluted (and mostly disprovable) “family lore” as a defense.
Being the “fake” Indian now is Elizabeth Warren’s brand, and nobody is branding her that way more aggressively than Donald Trump, as I wrote in late April 2017, Trump branding of Elizabeth Warren as Fake Indian continues, expecting her to run in 2020:
Trump doesn’t attack his political opponents, he brands them. The brand for Jeb was “low energy.” For Rubio, it was “little Marco.” For Cruz, it was “lyin’ Ted.” Once branded, they could not shake the image.
Just ask “Crooked Hillary.”
Which brings up Elizabeth Warren. As we posted earlier, while Warren is denying that she “is” running for president in 2020, she’s making all the normal pre-presidential run moves.
She’s raised her profile as the face of “the resistance,” a face Republicans also are jockeying to put out front.
Speaking at the NRA today, Trump warned that members should expect “Pocahontas” to run…
Trump is branding her. And being someone who was a fake Indian is her brand. She’ll never shake it.
The effectiveness of that branding was evident in a CNN interview with New Hampshire Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, who claims to be a direct descendant of Pocahontas and to have the family ancestry documented. Pocahontas allegedly was Shaheen’s 11th Great Grandmother.
CNN raise the Pocahontas ancestry with Shaheen, and then dropped the bomb, whether Shaheen had mentioned it to Elizabeth Warren:
Q. Have you told Elizabeth Warren?
A. Kind of a sensitive topic, so probably not.
It’s probably too late for Warren to put her Native American problem back in the bottle. But a complete and unreserved apology would be a good start.
Good luck if you're pinning your hopes on her or Hillary!
Did she kill anyone? Is she driving millions into bankruptcy so the ultra wealthy can have another tax cut?
Please.
Huckster79
Well-Known Member
Oceana was always at war with eastasia together with eurasia whom she had always been allies with. Until oceana had for always been at war with eurasia with her permanent ally eastasia... and no one was even aware of what had occurred...
ZaraBeth420
Well-Known Member
Take away a liberal's ability to call names, and he (i.e. you) has no ammunition. Because you don't think - you simply react. With hate.
You liberals are SO predictable.
I'm praying for you, tty...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
remember when you almost gained acceptance as zarabeth and then i identified the exact similarities in your grow closet and outed you as tbonejack and the whole forum laughed at you for weeks (and still do laugh at you)?
ZaraBeth420
Well-Known Member
So, you're a sock, huh? You're also Pinworm, complete with his tiny little dick?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you were too much of a pussy to answer my question so i will just ask it again.
remember when you almost gained acceptance as zarabeth and then i identified the exact similarities in your grow closet and outed you as tbonejack and the whole forum laughed at you for weeks (and still do laugh at you)?
ZaraBeth420
Well-Known Member
Well,
1. I absolutely AM a pussy (with no fish smell).
2. I never want acceptance from liberals. And especially not from you. You are a disgusting lump of diseased human (and other) cells, but it's kinda fun to play with you.
Make no mistake Buck: I NEVER want acceptance from any liberal. The least of which being you.