Political memes ONLY.. To prove your political points.

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Well according to your Congress you exist as an agent of the fed:

"Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. "

What do you intend to do about that?
Like I said, I don't care what they say. I wasn't born into this world to serve any man but me, and those I decide to serve. No amount of writing will change that. The government exists to serve the People, not the other way around.

You are welcome to reliquish your autonomy and become a robot programmed by the machine all you want. I'm one of those people who aim to fix the problem, not become the problem.
 
Last edited:

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Like I said, I don't care what they say. I wasn't born into this world to serve any man but me, and those I decide to serve. No amount of writing will change that. The government exists to serve the People, not the other way around.

You are welcome to reliquish your autonomy and become a robot programmed by the machine all you want. I'm one of those people who aim to fix the problem, not become the problem.
Same old leftist crap. "I can run the printing press with moral fortitude".
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Same old leftist crap. "I can run the printing press with moral fortitude".
It isn't "leftist." It's what America was founded upon. Funny how you have nothing relevant to rebut to my response. In fact, that response was nonsensical, because we're not talking about a printing press, we're talking about a country, and these principles I am speaking of have been part of being American for as long as the United States of America has been independent.

Are you telling me you'd rather live in a corrupt, immoral country? Because then you clearly are part of the problem. You are a tyrant, and you side with the tyrants. This being the case, you are an enemy of the state, not a patriot.

By the way, you know it's scientifically and statistically proven that Conservatives have lower IQs than people of more Liberal ideology, right? You demonstrate that pretty well.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives

"Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

IMG_6128.JPG"
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
It isn't "leftist." It's what America was founded upon. Funny how you have nothing relevant to rebut to my response. In fact, that response was nonsensical, because we're not talking about a printing press, we're talking about a country, and these principles I am speaking of have been part of being American for as long as the United States of America has been independent.

Are you telling me you'd rather live in a corrupt, immoral country? Because then you clearly are part of the problem. You are a tyrant, and you side with the tyrants. This being the case, you are an enemy of the state, not a patriot.

By the way, you know it's scientifically and statistically proven that Conservatives have lower IQs than people of more Liberal ideology, right? You demonstrate that pretty well.
Its because your response is ignorant. You are under contract when you use money, so you are an agent. You can go and use some magic mushrooms and some washuska of whatever your favorite tree bark is to think you are some transient being where none of this applies to you, and you would still be wrong.

growing and smoking weed while causing no harm to others is illegal because you're under contract.
Ran a stop sign safely? Here's your ticket, because you're under contract.
Better pay your income taxes, you're under contract.

Identifying the problem is pretty crucial to fixing it. Unless of course you are happy being complacent, as you are.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Its because your response is ignorant. You are under contract when you use money, so you are an agent. You can go and use some magic mushrooms and some washuska of whatever your favorite tree bark is to think you are some transient being where none of this applies to you, and you would still be wrong.

growing and smoking weed while causing no harm to others is illegal because you're under contract.
Ran a stop sign safely? Here's your ticket, because you're under contract.
Better pay your income taxes, you're under contract.

Identifying the problem is pretty crucial to fixing it. Unless of course you are happy being complacent, as you are.
Oh, I'm the ignorant one? You mean because I care about other people, and because whether or not morality dictates the law? Nice job making yourself look even dumber.

And, no. Growing and smoking weed is illegal due to an unconstitutional level of government inference. What we need to do is fix the establishment or eliminate it, because they are taking liberties that aren't theirs. Our rights aren't theirs to take, and there are consequences for seizing freedoms that aren't yours. England and France learned that lesson back in the late 1700s.

Don't worry: When all peaceful means are exhausted, I know who my enemies are. You're among them.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Oh, I'm the ignorant one? You mean because I care about other people, and because whether or not morality dictates the law? Nice job making yourself look even dumber.

And, no. Growing and smoking weed is illegal due to an unconstitutional level of government inference. What we need to do is fix the establishment or eliminate it, because they are taking liberties that aren't theirs. Our rights aren't theirs to take, and there are consequences for seizing freedoms that aren't yours. England and France learned that lesson back in the late 1700s.
You have the right to grow weed. You have contracted it away into a legal system because you are ignorant.

Since you brought up the Constitution, where is that amendment on weed? I see one for alcohol, but no weed. Hmmmmm
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
You have the right to grow weed. You have contracted it away into a legal system because you are ignorant.

Since you brought up the Constitution, where is that amendment on weed? I see one for alcohol, but no weed. Hmmmmm
The First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Seventh Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment, and the Preamble.

Especially the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th Amendments and the Preamble.
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
By the way, nice to know you stalk me. Wanna suck my dick?
Its because your response is ignorant. You are under contract when you use money, so you are an agent. You can go and use some magic mushrooms and some washuska of whatever your favorite tree bark is to think you are some transient being where none of this applies to you, and you would still be wrong.

growing and smoking weed while causing no harm to others is illegal because you're under contract.
Ran a stop sign safely? Here's your ticket, because you're under contract.
Better pay your income taxes, you're under contract.

Identifying the problem is pretty crucial to fixing it. Unless of course you are happy being complacent, as you are.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
The First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Seventh Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment, and the Preamble.

Especially the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th Amendments and the Preamble.
No mention of marijuana. Although I like where you're going with this. Alcohol was never mentioned either, until it was prohibited. Since weed isn't specifically mentioned, it must be lawful then.

Why do you suppose we voluntarily traded this simplicity for the Code of Federal Regulations? Nothing to do with Money amirite?
 

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
No mention of marijuana. Although I like where you're going with this. Alcohol was never mentioned either, until it was prohibited. Since weed isn't specifically mentioned, it must be lawful then.

Why do you suppose we voluntarily traded this simplicity for the Code of Federal Regulations? Nothing to do with Money amirite?
It doesn't have to mention marijuana directly. It mentions the freedom behind it. I pity you for being a slave. I hope your dumb ass finds freedom soon.

"We" didn't trade shit. The Government became corrupt, and the Constitution and Bill of Rights still stands. It's still relevant enough to apply to court cases today. Otherwise, Lee Boyd Malvo would still be serving a life term.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
It doesn't have to mention marijuana directly. It mentions the freedom behind it. I pity you for being a slave. I hope your dumb ass finds freedom soon.
Then why did it have to mention alcohol directly? Why does it mention the press specifically?

Can't address that so lets throw some shit huh. Sad.

What would you know about fighting? You never leave the trailer park. Meanwhile, you're talking to someone who earned his pension fighting.
I know you're not faster than my microtech scarab.




But thanks for your service.
 
Last edited:

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Then why did it have to mention alcohol directly? Why does it mention the press specifically?

Can't address that so lets throw some shit huh. Sad.



I know you're faster than my microtech scarab.




But thanks for your service.
Why do you think they removed the mention and restriction of Alcohol? Those two amendments were repealed, because they were unconstitutional and conflicted not only with the will of the people, but the peace and civility of everyday life.

They didn't create an amendment specifically prohibiting weed, either, did they? No, they did not.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Why do you think they removed the mention and restriction of Alcohol? Those two amendments were repealed, because they were unconstitutional and conflicted not only with the will of the people, but the peace and civility of everyday life.

They didn't create an amendment specifically prohibiting weed, either, did they? No, they did not.

Try and pay attention.

The first time alcohol was specifically mentioned was to prohibit it.

Then it was repealed and left to the states.

Which means before it was mentioned it was perfectly lawful, and reserved for the states.

Precedence for substances.

muh supremecy clause
 
Top