dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Sure, comrade.
This Is Far Worse Than Anyone Could've Ever Imagined..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Aren't you the one who wouldn't hire people based on their name?
(Not that in your telesales job you'd ever get to hire anyone anyway, but whatever)
Are you referring to the HBO documentary on the negative effects of tribalism which I tried to have have a rational discussion with the 'if you post it, you support it members?'
Then yes, that would be me.
Last edited:
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
No I'm referring to you telling people like londonfog that they shouldn't name their "brats" with names you've determined to be "too black" if they want to get a job.
You also said you personally wouldn't hire them.
Yo, @londonfog can you post the quote again please?
Citation for your quotes.
You get one response a day and I gave you two.
Now now toddle along, will you?
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Why can't you just admit you said it and apologise for being a racist idiot?
That would at least mean you've seen tje error of your ways and you're now "cured".
Denial of it and then questioning someone else's views about exclusionary practices is just ridiculous.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So, what you're saying is people don't have a right to control their own bodies and their property ?
A black person must accept a KKK bigot coming into his place of business and should be forced to serve him? What are you, a racist?
No. Your doors should be open to all. It is up to the recipient to choose if he enters.
Who force? What force?
Something a good sales person knows..Whatever Is Necessary = WIN. You don't win if you don't get him. Everyone's money is the same color and spends the same
Class dismissed!
Last edited:
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Reporting posts and having them deleted?'Cured' of my affliction? Are you sure you're not Republican?
Sad sad woman.
No. Your doors should be open to all. It is up to the recipient to choose if he enters.
Who force? What force?
Something a good sales person knows..Whatever Is Necessary = WIN. You don't win if you don't get him. Everyone's money is the same color and spends the same
Class dismissed!
So you have no problem convincing someone to buy something they don't need simply so you can collect the money?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
nope. no one is born wearing a klan robe. the black owner has every right to deny service.
you seriously don't get it and will never stop spamming us with your neo-nazi propaganda. sad.
just die already you miserable dumb racist.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No. Your doors should be open to all. It is up to the recipient to choose if he enters.
Who force? What force?
Something a good sales person knows..Whatever Is Necessary = WIN. You don't win if you don't get him. Everyone's money is the same color and spends the same
Class dismissed!
But if the black guy was smart he'd take his money then wipe his ass with it..perspective my friend.
He who laughs last laughs best
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So, in some cases you believe a person has a right to exercise control over their own property, but in others you don't?
In some cases you believe it is okay for one party to force the interaction against the wishes of the other party?
Could you define the characteristics of the relationship between a given piece of property and the owner and how that relationship differentiates between an owner and a non owner? (I bet you can't)
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
That's correct, because I'm not. I think the problem you might be having, is you and your kind seem to default to the idea that my observations of another persons behavior are also my endorsements of a given other persons behavior.
I'll bet you never admit to being obtuse.
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Hey now, it's all about basic human FREEDOMS -- if a person (not me, because I'm totally not a nationalist racist throwback that lives in a trailer in the woods) CHOOSES not to serve a 'certain person' at a diner or doesn't want to be around 'certain people', isn't that their RIGHT?
While on the subject, why CAN'T a 12-year-old consent to sex? Can you answer that? I bet you can't.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
It almost sounds like you are focusing on maligning me, rather than rebutting or addressing the things that I say. That's known as a distraction and is sometimes employed by a person who has the weaker argument.
If you were confident in your flawed arguments, you'd present them, and then I would flay them by pointing out the inconsistencies and false dichotomies etc.
