Anti government in the politics section

TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I say you should paint your mailbox any color you like, because it's yours.
Click to expand...
You can. That's entirely up to you. There are only two laws governing how you MUST use your mailbox:
  1. The flag for notification of outgoing mail MUST be red.
  2. Nobody is allowed to put ANYTHING into the mailbox unless it has postage on it.
That's it.

Once again you complain about something there is no reason to complain about. Why do you think there's a multi-billion dollar custom mailbox industry?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
You can. That's entirely up to you. There are only two laws governing how you MUST use your mailbox:
  1. The flag for notification of outgoing mail MUST be red.
  2. Nobody is allowed to put ANYTHING into the mailbox unless it has postage on it.
That's it.

Once again you complain about something there is no reason to complain about. Why do you think there's a multi-billion dollar custom mailbox industry?
Click to expand...

upload_2017-3-14_18-57-28.png
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
As far as private property, you're perfectly welcome to do exactly that.

As far as public property, you are not.

That has been answered about 8 times already and you constantly ignore it. And no, your business is NOT private property. It's public property. It becomes public property subject to public law the instant you apply for a business license and are granted that license.

If you want to be the racist, redneck idiot you are, then stay in your house with the wheels on it and don't venture into public.

If you venture into the public domain, you'll have to deal with everybody regardless of your racism.

It's that simple.
Click to expand...

Can a person delegate a right they do not possess?
 
thenotsoesoteric

thenotsoesoteric

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
false.

also, this

how the south voted:

1880: democrats
1884: democrats
1888: democrats
1892: democrats
1896: democrats
1900: democrats
1904: democrats
1908: democrats
1912: democrats
1916: democrats
1920: democrats
1924: democrats
1928: democrats
1932: democrats
1936: democrats
1940: democrats
1944: democrats
1948: democrats
1952: democrats
1956: democrats
1960: democrats
1964: republican
1968: racial segregation
1972: republican
1976: republican
1980: republican
1984: republican
1988: republican
1992: republican
1996: republican
2000: republican
2004: republican
2008: republican
2012: republican
2016: republican

no switch though.

LULZ
Click to expand...
I've seen a lot of Trump supporters popping off at the mouth about how Democrats were the political party of the slave holding South. Then I would wipe their little bit of smug arrogance by informing them that yes it was the Democratic Party but the parties flip flopped around the civil rights era. Education is the key.
 
thenotsoesoteric

thenotsoesoteric

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
No, the person INSISTING that a human relationship take place over the objections of a neutral party is the one that is wrong. It is true regardless of the skin color of the participants.

Your policy, forcing another person to associate with you, or to serve you when they prefer not to attempts to use a means, offensive force, to create a positive circumstance. That is impossible though, since the circumstance arose not from consent, instead it arose from the use of offensive force.

What you are really saying is when you like the outcome, you're okay with the use of offensive force. Can you deny that in any coherent way? No, you can't.
Click to expand...
Damn bro, you need to work on your logic and reasoning skills and stop reading libertarian propaganda.

And why would someone waste their time to respond to your question about denial. This topic has already been hashed out like 50 years ago bro. BUt if you like the 50's era so much you should check out Cuba or build your ass a time machine because things WILL NEVER GO BACK TO WHAT THEY ONCE WERE. Lol :dunce:
 
thenotsoesoteric

thenotsoesoteric

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That's true. But when their own opinions contradict one another, like yours have in our recent exchange, that's a clue that one of their opinions is inaccurate.

It seems you not only don't want to agree with me, you don't consistently agree with yourself. You claim to be an advocate for peace, but then you rationalize why it's okay for one person to force another neutral person to associate with them. That's an example of your holding two opposing opinions at once.


I don't think a person can delegate a right they don't have. In that regard I've aligned my opinion with a fact. If you think a person CAN delegate a right they don't have, please offer an example of how that can be done.
Click to expand...
*But when their own opinions contradict one another, like yours have in our recent exchange, that's a clue that one of their opinions is inaccurate.*

Or they're both fucking wrong, especially if you're trying to imply you're the correct one.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Please explain how offensive force and defensive force are different and what makes them different.
Click to expand...
kicking black customers out of your store because they are black is offensive force. you call it the exact opposite, because you are a neo-nazi white supremacist in love with racial segregation.
 
thenotsoesoteric

thenotsoesoteric

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
You say the white southern racist turned Republican after civil rights...with no evidence...but the black vote went dem in the 30s.
Click to expand...
Look up share cropping in the South around those times and you'll learn why so many blacks in the south voted for democrats. I'll give you a hint, it has to do with coercion and breaking white farmers with smaller farms. Imagine that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top